IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v32y2018i4p687-706.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Flexible men and Successful Women: The Effects of Flexible Working Hours on German Couples’ Wages

Author

Listed:
  • Laura Antonia Langner

Abstract

Work hour flexibility is believed to help couples manage career and family demands. The German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP) is unique in following both the flexible employee and their partner over time. The study utilizes this feature to investigate whether the take-up of work hour flexibility is detrimental for the flexible employee’s wage development. Men and women benefit from flexible working hours. For women, this positive wage effect occurs late, suggesting that, unlike men, they must first prove their commitment. Moreover, it tests for the first time whether flexible workers’ partners profit from the increased couple-level flexibility. The positive cross-partner effect for the inflexible partner is particularly pronounced for mothers’ wages, suggesting that men may use flexible working hours to support their wives’ careers. These measures are not necessarily used more frequently by those in need (e.g. parents or women). Instead, they seem to be accessed by those in sought-after positions.

Suggested Citation

  • Laura Antonia Langner, 2018. "Flexible men and Successful Women: The Effects of Flexible Working Hours on German Couples’ Wages," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 32(4), pages 687-706, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:32:y:2018:i:4:p:687-706
    DOI: 10.1177/0950017017708161
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0950017017708161
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0950017017708161?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Heather Boushey, 2008. "Family Friendly Policies: Helping Mothers Make Ends Meet," Review of Social Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 66(1), pages 51-70.
    2. Petersen, Trond & Penner, Andrew M & Høgsnes, Geir, 2014. "From Motherhood Penalties to Husband Premia: The New Challenge for Gender Equality and Family Policy, Lessons from Norway," Institute for Research on Labor and Employment, Working Paper Series qt2hk409sk, Institute of Industrial Relations, UC Berkeley.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. John R. Logan & Andrew Foster & Jun Ke & Fan Li, 2017. "The Uptick in Income Segregation: Real Trend or Random Sampling Variance," NBER Working Papers 23656, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Juho Härkönen & Marika Jalovaara & Eevi Lappalainen & Anneli Miettinen, 2023. "Double Disadvantage in a Nordic Welfare State: A Demographic Analysis of the Single-Parent Employment Gap in Finland, 1987–2018," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 39(1), pages 1-27, December.
    3. Tay K. McNamara & Marcie Pitt-Catsouphes & Melissa Brown & Christina Matz-Costa, 2012. "Access to and Utilization of Flexible Work Options," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(4), pages 936-965, October.
    4. repec:osf:socarx:sbyz9_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Di Nallo, Alessandro, 2024. "Women’s job market outcomes around live and non-live births," OSF Preprints 2m4xb, Center for Open Science.
    6. Astrid Kunze, 2020. "The effect of children on male earnings and inequality," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 683-710, September.
    7. Brady, David & Blome, Agnes & Kmec, Julie A., 2018. "Work-Family Reconciliation Policies and Women's and Mothers' Labor Market Outcomes in Rich Democracies," SocArXiv sbyz9, Center for Open Science.
    8. Zhang, Cheng & Jian, Yaode & Zhou, Zhongsheng & Zhou, Bo, 2024. "Can the digital economy close the gender wage gap? Evidence from China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 96(PB).
    9. Heather Boushey, 2008. "“Opting out?” The effect of children on women's employment in the United States," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(1), pages 1-36.
    10. Vadim Ustyuzhanin, 2025. "Parenthood Penalty in Russia: Evidence from Exogenous Variation in Family Size," Papers 2506.11858, arXiv.org.
    11. Mari, Gabriele & Cutuli, Giorgio, 2018. "Do parental leaves make the motherhood wage penalty worse? Assessing two decades of German reforms," SocArXiv f2nrc, Center for Open Science.
    12. Sylvia Fuller & Lynn Prince Cooke, 2018. "Workplace Variation in Fatherhood Wage Premiums: Do Formalization and Performance Pay Matter?," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 32(4), pages 768-788, August.
    13. Daniel Oesch & Oliver Lipps & Patrick McDonald, 2017. "The wage penalty for motherhood: Evidence on discrimination from panel data and a survey experiment for Switzerland," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 37(56), pages 1793-1824.
    14. Wei Huang & Yiping Wang & Hantao Wu & Yi Zhou, 2025. "The motherhood penalty and low fertility in China: a pseudo-event study," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 38(1), pages 1-29, March.
    15. repec:osf:osfxxx:2m4xb_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Wilfred Dolfsma & Deborah Figart & Robert McMaster & Martha Starr, 2012. "Promoting Research on Intersections of Economics, Ethics, and Social Values: Editorial," Review of Social Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 70(2), pages 155-163, June.
    17. Andrea Hjálmsdóttir & Valgerður S. Bjarnadóttir, 2021. "“I have turned into a foreman here at home”: Families and work–life balance in times of COVID‐19 in a gender equality paradise," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 268-283, January.
    18. Heather Boushey, 2005. "Are Women Opting Out? Debunking the Myth," CEPR Reports and Issue Briefs 2005-36, Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR).
    19. Christian Nsiah & Ron DeBeaumont & Annette Ryerson, 2013. "Motherhood and Earnings: Wage Variability by Major Occupational Category and Earnings Level," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 224-234, June.
    20. Drahomíra Zajíčková & Miroslav Zajíček, 2021. "Otcovský bonus v České republice, jeho vývoj a zdroje [Fatherhood Premium in the Czech Republic - Its Evolution and Sources]," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2021(5), pages 529-554.
    21. Wei-hsin Yu & Chi-Tsun Chiu, 2016. "Growing Pains: Changes in Psychological Well-Being in Urban China," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 129(3), pages 1349-1382, December.
    22. Drahomíra Zajíèková & Miroslav Zajíèek, 2022. "The Fatherhood Premium or the Fatherhood Penalty? It Depends on the Type of Marriage You’re in: The Case of Slovakia 2009 through 2018," Journal of Economics / Ekonomicky casopis, Institute of Economic Research, Slovak Academy of Sciences, vol. 70(7-8), pages 646-677, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:32:y:2018:i:4:p:687-706. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.