IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v61y2024i16p3050-3068.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What’s in a name? Place misrepresentation and neighbourhood stigma in the online rental market

Author

Listed:
  • Ariela Schachter

    (Washington University in St. Louis, USA)

  • John Kuk

    (University of Oklahoma, USA)

  • Max Besbris

    (University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA)

  • Lydia Ho

    (Washington University in St. Louis, USA)

Abstract

In this article we examine how the online rental housing market reflects the desirability of different neighbourhoods in St. Louis, MO, a metropolitan area with long-standing high levels of Black–White residential segregation. Using a large digital corpus of advertisements for rental housing, we first show that adverts in neighbourhoods with more Black residents are less likely to list a neighbourhood name than adverts for available housing units in neighbourhoods with more White residents. Advertisements for housing in neighbourhoods with more Black residents are also more likely to list a different, higher-income neighbourhood name than the one in which they are located. Next, using a survey of St. Louis residents, we find that neighbourhoods with more Black residents are perceived as less desirable by both White and Black St. Louisans. We then employ a pair of survey experiments and find that interest in renting a particular housing unit changes if the advert does not list a neighbourhood name or uses a different neighbourhood name than one commonly associated with its location. Altogether, our findings reveal that postings in online housing markets reflect and reproduce existing racial-spatial patterns and may contribute to the avoidance/stigmatisation of certain neighbourhoods.

Suggested Citation

  • Ariela Schachter & John Kuk & Max Besbris & Lydia Ho, 2024. "What’s in a name? Place misrepresentation and neighbourhood stigma in the online rental market," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(16), pages 3050-3068, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:61:y:2024:i:16:p:3050-3068
    DOI: 10.1177/00420980231198147
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00420980231198147
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00420980231198147?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:61:y:2024:i:16:p:3050-3068. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.