IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v39y2002i13p2469-2483.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparative Analysis of the Air Quality Management Challenges and Capabilities in Urban and Rural English Local Authorities

Author

Listed:
  • C.I. Beattie

    (Air Quality Research Group, Centre for Research in Environmental Systems, Pollution and Remediation, University of the West of England, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Frenchay Campus, Bristol, BS16 IQY, UK, clare.beattie@uwe.ac.uk)

  • J.W.S. Longhurst

    (Air Quality Research Group, Centre for Research in Environmental Systems, Pollution and Remediation, University of the West of England, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Frenchay Campus, Bristol, BS16 IQY, UK, james.Longhurst@uwe.ac.uk)

  • N.K. Woodfield

    (Air Quality Research Group, Centre for Research in Environmental Systems, Pollution and Remediation, University of the West of England, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Frenchay Campus, Bristol, BS16 IQY, UK, nicky.woodfield@uwe.ac.uk)

Abstract

Local authorities in Great Britain have (in the main) completed their air quality review and assessments, the aim of the process being the identification of local hotspots where national air quality objectives are not likely to be met. Across Great Britain approximately 120 Air Quality Management Areas are in the process of being declared. Local authorities, in partnership with others, are required to write and implement an action plan outlining remedial measures to improve the air quality situation in these areas. This paper compares and contrasts the challenges facing urban and rural authorities in carrying out these responsibilities. The capabilities of urban, rural and those authorities defined as 'mixed' in implementing the review and assessment process also are discussed. The data presented indicate that, although urban authorities appear to be facing greater and more complex air quality challenges, rural areas are not without their own air quality challenges. The issues facing urban authorities are different from those facing their more rural counterparts. It is hypothesised that urban authorities have more effective frameworks in place for tackling the challenges of air quality action planning. This hypothesis is tested by questionnaire surveys and in the context of an urban and a rural case-study authority.

Suggested Citation

  • C.I. Beattie & J.W.S. Longhurst & N.K. Woodfield, 2002. "A Comparative Analysis of the Air Quality Management Challenges and Capabilities in Urban and Rural English Local Authorities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 39(13), pages 2469-2483, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:39:y:2002:i:13:p:2469-2483
    DOI: 10.1080/0042098022000027068
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/0042098022000027068
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0042098022000027068?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Jerrett & Richard T Burnett & Pavlos Kanaroglou & John Eyles & Norm Finkelstein & Chris Giovis & Jeffrey R Brook, 2001. "A GIS–Environmental Justice Analysis of Particulate Air Pollution in Hamilton, Canada," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 33(6), pages 955-973, June.
    2. Derek Elsom, 1999. "Development and Implementation of Strategic Frameworks for Air Quality Management in the UK and the European Community," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(1), pages 103-121.
    3. William P. Anderson & Pavlos S. Kanaroglou & Eric J. Miller, 1996. "Urban Form, Energy and the Environment: A Review of Issues, Evidence and Policy," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 33(1), pages 7-35, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. C. I. Beattie & J. W. S. Longhurst & N. K. Woodfield, 2000. "AIR Quality Management: Challenges and Solutions in Delivering Air Quality Action Plans," Energy & Environment, , vol. 11(6), pages 729-747, November.
    2. Marcus Adolphson, 2010. "Kernel Densities and Mixed Functionality in a Multicentred Urban Region," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 37(3), pages 550-566, June.
    3. Changchun Feng & Hao Zhang & Liang Xiao & Yongpei Guo, 2022. "Land Use Change and Its Driving Factors in the Rural–Urban Fringe of Beijing: A Production–Living–Ecological Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-18, February.
    4. Banister, David, 2011. "Cities, mobility and climate change," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(6), pages 1538-1546.
    5. Michiel Fremouw & Annamaria Bagaini & Paolo De Pascali, 2020. "Energy Potential Mapping: Open Data in Support of Urban Transition Planning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-15, March.
    6. Juliane Große & Christian Fertner & Niels Boje Groth, 2016. "Urban Structure, Energy and Planning: Findings from Three Cities in Sweden, Finland and Estonia," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 1(1), pages 24-40.
    7. Kang-Rae Ma & David Banister, 2007. "Urban Spatial Change and Excess Commuting," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 39(3), pages 630-646, March.
    8. Diana Saadi & Emanuel Tirosh & Izhak Schnell, 2021. "The Relationship between City Size and Carbon Monoxide (CO) Concentration and Their Effect on Heart Rate Variability (HRV)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-13, January.
    9. Andrea CIRILLI & Paolo VENERI, 2010. "Spatial Structure and CO2 Emissions Due to Commuting: an Analysis on Italian Urban Areas," Working Papers 353, Universita' Politecnica delle Marche (I), Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali.
    10. Cameron, I. & Lyons, T. J. & Kenworthy, J. R., 2004. "Trends in vehicle kilometres of travel in world cities, 1960-1990: underlying drivers and policy responses," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 11(3), pages 287-298, July.
    11. Davide Burgalassi & Tommaso Luzzati, 2015. "Urban spatial structure and environmental emissions: a survey of the literature and some empirical evidence for Italian NUTS-3 regions," Discussion Papers 2015/199, Dipartimento di Economia e Management (DEM), University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
    12. Duncan, Michael & Christensen, Robert K., 2013. "An analysis of park-and-ride provision at light rail stations across the US," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 148-157.
    13. Hanneke Kruize & Mariël Droomers & Irene Van Kamp & Annemarie Ruijsbroek, 2014. "What Causes Environmental Inequalities and Related Health Effects? An Analysis of Evolving Concepts," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-21, May.
    14. Lara Engelfriet & Eric Koomen, 2018. "The impact of urban form on commuting in large Chinese cities," Transportation, Springer, vol. 45(5), pages 1269-1295, September.
    15. Saeed Ghavidelfar & Asaad Y. Shamseldin & Bruce W. Melville, 2017. "Future implications of urban intensification on residential water demand," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 60(10), pages 1809-1824, October.
    16. Fertner Christian & Große Juliane, 2016. "Compact and Resource Efficient Cities? Synergies and Trade-offs in European Cities," European Spatial Research and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 23(1), pages 65-79, June.
    17. Philipp Rode & Alexandra Gomes & Muhammad Adeel & Fizzah Sajjad & Andreas Koch & Syed Monjur Murshed, 2020. "Between Abundance and Constraints: The Natural Resource Equation of Asia’s Diverging, Higher-Income City Models," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-33, October.
    18. Frans M. Dieleman & Martin Dijst & Guillaume Burghouwt, 2002. "Urban Form and Travel Behaviour: Micro-level Household Attributes and Residential Context," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 39(3), pages 507-527, March.
    19. Clune, Stephen & Morrissey, John & Moore, Trivess, 2012. "Size matters: House size and thermal efficiency as policy strategies to reduce net emissions of new developments," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 657-667.
    20. Igor Vojnovic, 2000. "Shaping Metropolitan Toronto: A Study of Linear Infrastructure Subsidies, 1954–66," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 27(2), pages 197-230, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:39:y:2002:i:13:p:2469-2483. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.