IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v11y1974i3p277-288.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Evaluation of Benefits from Recreational Projects

Author

Listed:
  • R.W. Vickerman

    (Economics, University of Hull)

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • R.W. Vickerman, 1974. "The Evaluation of Benefits from Recreational Projects," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 11(3), pages 277-288, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:11:y:1974:i:3:p:277-288
    DOI: 10.1080/00420987420080541
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/00420987420080541
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00420987420080541?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R W Vickerman, 1974. "A Demand Model for Leisure Travel," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 6(1), pages 65-77, February.
    2. Robert J. Smith, 1971. "The Evaluation of Recreation Benefits: the Clawson Method in Practice," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 8(2), pages 89-102, June.
    3. Vickerman, Roger, 1972. "An analysis of demand for shopping and leisure travel," Economics PhD Theses 0172, Department of Economics, University of Sussex Business School.
    4. Lewis, R. C. & Whitby, M. C., 1972. "Recreation Benefits From A Reservoir," Department of Agricultural Economics Archive 272892, University of Newcastle upon Tyne.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. R.W. Vickerman, 1979. "The Evaluation of Urban Change: Equilibrium and Adaptive Approaches," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 16(1), pages 81-93, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Centre for Agricultural Strategy, 1976. "Land for agriculture," Centre for Agricultural Strategy - Papers and Reports 337516, University of Reading.
    2. Armbrecht, John, 2014. "Use value of cultural experiences: A comparison of contingent valuation and travel cost," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 141-148.
    3. C Price, 1980. "Resolution and Resolvability in Resource Use Conflicts: The National Park Example," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 12(11), pages 1221-1233, November.
    4. Schmid, A. Allan, 2004. "Economic Analysis And Efficiency In Public Expenditure," Staff Paper Series 11776, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    5. H.B. Rodgers, 1972. "Problems and Progress in Recreation Research: a Review of Some Recent Work," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 9(2), pages 223-228, June.
    6. Sławomir Goliszek, 2021. "GIS tools and programming languages for creating models of public and private transport potential accessibility in Szczecin, Poland," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 115-137, January.
    7. Stępniak, Marcin & Pritchard, John P. & Geurs, Karst T. & Goliszek, Sławomir, 2019. "The impact of temporal resolution on public transport accessibility measurement: Review and case study in Poland," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 8-24.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:11:y:1974:i:3:p:277-288. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.