IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/soudev/v17y2022i1p108-133.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Sociotechnical System of Silk Weaving in Bishnupur Region in West Bengal

Author

Listed:
  • Abhradip Banerjee
  • Gopalkrishna Chakrabarti

Abstract

The article analyses the sociotechnical system of the silk weaving industry in the Bishnupur region of West Bengal through a detailed description of processes and interactions between important technical elements and the human agents within a richly structured environment of silk cloth production. It shows that the various processes of silk cloth production and marketing constitute an ensemble of economic inequalities, skill differentiation and differences in power and prestige. Different groups restructure the hierarchy by participating in the network of silk cloth production in which raw materials are converted into stable or viable products. The article thus provides an overview of how capitalist development is shaping the lives and livelihoods of silk weaving artisans in West Bengal.

Suggested Citation

  • Abhradip Banerjee & Gopalkrishna Chakrabarti, 2022. "The Sociotechnical System of Silk Weaving in Bishnupur Region in West Bengal," Journal of South Asian Development, , vol. 17(1), pages 108-133, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:soudev:v:17:y:2022:i:1:p:108-133
    DOI: 10.1177/09731741221083086
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09731741221083086
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09731741221083086?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tirthankar Roy, 2002. "Acceptance of innovations in early twentieth–century Indian weaving," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 55(3), pages 507-532, August.
    2. Annapurna Mamidipudi & Radhika Gajjala, 2008. "Juxtaposing handloom weaving and modernity: building theory through praxis," Development in Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 235-244, April.
    3. Roy,Tirthankar, 2007. "Traditional Industry in the Economy of Colonial India," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521033053.
    4. S. Mansoob Murshed, 2004. "Globalization and South Asia: A Perspective," South Asia Economic Journal, Institute of Policy Studies of Sri Lanka, vol. 5(2), pages 311-326, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tirthankar Roy, 2009. "Did globalisation aid industrial development in colonial India? A study of knowledge transfer in the iron industry," The Indian Economic & Social History Review, , vol. 46(4), pages 579-613, October.
    2. Tirthankar Roy, 2012. "Consumption Of Cotton Cloth In India, 1795–1940," Australian Economic History Review, Economic History Society of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 52(1), pages 61-84, March.
    3. Karuna Dietrich Wielenga, 2015. "The geography of weaving in early nineteenth-century south India," The Indian Economic & Social History Review, , vol. 52(2), pages 147-184, April.
    4. Roy, Tirthankar, 2021. "Useful & reliable: technological transformation in colonial India," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 113442, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Roy, Tirthankar, 2014. "Technology in Colonial India: Three Discourses," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 198, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
    6. Tirthankar Roy, 2002. "Economic History and Modern India: Redefining the Link," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 16(3), pages 109-130, Summer.
    7. Charu Gupta, 2010. "Feminine, criminal or manly?," The Indian Economic & Social History Review, , vol. 47(3), pages 309-342, July.
    8. David Clingingsmith, 2014. "Industrialization and Bilingualism in India," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 49(1), pages 73-109.
    9. Shrotryia Vijay Kumar & Singh Shashank Vikram Pratap, 2020. "A Short History of India’s Economy: Pre- and Post-Independence Period," Economic and Regional Studies / Studia Ekonomiczne i Regionalne, Sciendo, vol. 13(4), pages 388-406, December.
    10. Milan Balaban & Jan Herman & Dalibor Savic´, 2021. "The early decades of the Bata Shoe Company in India: From establishment to economic and social integration," The Indian Economic & Social History Review, , vol. 58(3), pages 297-332, July.
    11. Gadre, Animesh, 2021. "Deindustrialisation and the Drain Theory: The Contours of Economic Degradation in British India," MPRA Paper 108977, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Tyabji, Nasir, 2015. "The Politics of Industry in Nehru's India," MPRA Paper 62260, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Bishnupriya Gupta, 2019. "Falling behind and catching up: India's transition from a colonial economy," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 72(3), pages 803-827, August.
    14. Natalie Gupta, 2011. "A story of (foretold) decline:artisan labour in India," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series 15611, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    15. Orlanda Ruthven, 2018. "Getting Dividend from Demography: Skills Policy and Labour Management in Contemporary Indian Industry," Journal of South Asian Development, , vol. 13(3), pages 315-336, December.
    16. Srinivas, Smita, 2007. "Urban labour markets in the 21st century: dualism, regulation and the role(s) of the State," MPRA Paper 53099, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Gupta, Bishnupriya, 2018. "Falling Behind and Catching up: India’s Transition from a Colonial Economy," CEPR Discussion Papers 12581, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    18. Vijay K. Seth, 2014. "Debate on De-industrialization Revisited: The Process of Decline of Traditional Flexible Manufacturing," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 15(3), pages 597-610, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:soudev:v:17:y:2022:i:1:p:108-133. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.