IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/soudev/v17y2022i1p108-133.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Sociotechnical System of Silk Weaving in Bishnupur Region in West Bengal

Author

Listed:
  • Abhradip Banerjee
  • Gopalkrishna Chakrabarti

Abstract

The article analyses the sociotechnical system of the silk weaving industry in the Bishnupur region of West Bengal through a detailed description of processes and interactions between important technical elements and the human agents within a richly structured environment of silk cloth production. It shows that the various processes of silk cloth production and marketing constitute an ensemble of economic inequalities, skill differentiation and differences in power and prestige. Different groups restructure the hierarchy by participating in the network of silk cloth production in which raw materials are converted into stable or viable products. The article thus provides an overview of how capitalist development is shaping the lives and livelihoods of silk weaving artisans in West Bengal.

Suggested Citation

  • Abhradip Banerjee & Gopalkrishna Chakrabarti, 2022. "The Sociotechnical System of Silk Weaving in Bishnupur Region in West Bengal," Journal of South Asian Development, , vol. 17(1), pages 108-133, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:soudev:v:17:y:2022:i:1:p:108-133
    DOI: 10.1177/09731741221083086
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09731741221083086
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09731741221083086?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tirthankar Roy, 2002. "Acceptance of innovations in early twentieth–century Indian weaving," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 55(3), pages 507-532, August.
    2. Annapurna Mamidipudi & Radhika Gajjala, 2008. "Juxtaposing handloom weaving and modernity: building theory through praxis," Development in Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 235-244, April.
    3. Roy,Tirthankar, 2007. "Traditional Industry in the Economy of Colonial India," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521033053, June.
    4. Clingingsmith, David & Williamson, Jeffrey G., 2008. "Deindustrialization in 18th and 19th century India: Mughal decline, climate shocks and British industrial ascent," Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 209-234, July.
    5. S. Mansoob Murshed, 2004. "Globalization and South Asia: A Perspective," South Asia Economic Journal, Institute of Policy Studies of Sri Lanka, vol. 5(2), pages 311-326, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tirthankar Roy, 2012. "Consumption Of Cotton Cloth In India, 1795–1940," Australian Economic History Review, Economic History Society of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 52(1), pages 61-84, March.
    2. Gadre, Animesh, 2021. "Deindustrialisation and the Drain Theory: The Contours of Economic Degradation in British India," MPRA Paper 108977, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Bishnupriya Gupta, 2019. "Falling behind and catching up: India's transition from a colonial economy," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 72(3), pages 803-827, August.
    4. Tirthankar Roy, 2009. "Did globalisation aid industrial development in colonial India? A study of knowledge transfer in the iron industry," The Indian Economic & Social History Review, , vol. 46(4), pages 579-613, October.
    5. Gupta, Bishnupriya, 2018. "Falling Behind and Catching up: India’s Transition from a Colonial Economy," CEPR Discussion Papers 12581, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    6. Rishabh Kumar, 2019. "The evolution of wealth-income ratios in India, 1860-2012," Working Papers hal-02876998, HAL.
    7. Karuna Dietrich Wielenga, 2015. "The geography of weaving in early nineteenth-century south India," The Indian Economic & Social History Review, , vol. 52(2), pages 147-184, April.
    8. Roy, Tirthankar, 2021. "Useful & reliable: technological transformation in colonial India," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 113442, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    9. Pim de Zwart & Jan Lucassen, 2020. "Poverty or prosperity in northern India? New evidence on real wages, 1590s–1870s," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 73(3), pages 644-667, August.
    10. Şevket Pamuk & Jeffrey G. Williamson, 2011. "Ottoman de-industrialization, 1800–1913: assessing the magnitude, impact, and response," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 64, pages 159-184, February.
    11. Tyabji, Nasir, 2015. "The Politics of Industry in Nehru's India," MPRA Paper 62260, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Laura Panza, 2014. "De-industrialization and re-industrialization in the Middle East: reflections on the cotton industry in Egypt and in the Izmir region," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 67(1), pages 146-169, February.
    13. repec:osf:socarx:zmfjn_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Sugandha Huria & Kriti Sharma & Neha Jain & Ashley Jose, 2022. "Digitalization and Exports: A case of Indian Manufacturing MSMEs," Working Papers 2261, Indian Institute of Foreign Trade.
    15. Sambit Bhattacharyya, 2020. "A History of Global Capitalism: Feuding Elites and Imperial Expansion," Working Paper Series 1020, Department of Economics, University of Sussex Business School.
    16. Fenske, James & Kala, Namrata & Wei, Jinlin, 2023. "Railways and cities in India," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    17. Natalie Gupta, 2011. "A story of (foretold) decline:artisan labour in India," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series 15611, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    18. Arhan Ertan & Louis Putterman & Martin Fiszbein, 2012. "Determinants and Economic Consequences of Colonization: A Global Analysis," Working Papers 2012-5, Brown University, Department of Economics.
    19. Broadberry, Stephen & Custodis, Johann & Gupta, Bishnupriya, 2015. "India and the great divergence: An Anglo-Indian comparison of GDP per capita, 1600–1871," Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 58-75.
    20. Roy, Tirthankar, 2014. "Technology in Colonial India: Three Discourses," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 198, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
    21. Orlanda Ruthven, 2018. "Getting Dividend from Demography: Skills Policy and Labour Management in Contemporary Indian Industry," Journal of South Asian Development, , vol. 13(3), pages 315-336, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:soudev:v:17:y:2022:i:1:p:108-133. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.