IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socres/v26y2021i1p130-146.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Students as ‘Animal Laborans’? Tracing Student Politics in a Marketised Higher Education Setting

Author

Listed:
  • Rille Raaper

Abstract

This article examines the widespread policy discourses that have constructed the notion of student as consumer in English higher education, and it questions the implications of such fabrications on students’ political engagement. In particular, it explores the extent to which students have been forced into a position of an ‘animal laboran’ whose primary function is to focus on immediate necessities in highly pressurised university environments. By drawing on Arendt, the article will first consider the shift towards representative practices in student politics, characterised by professionalisation of students’ unions. Second, the article will draw on Foucault to investigate the ways in which more personalised forms of students’ political participation related to private interest and single-issue campaigns can emerge in neoliberalised universities and society more broadly.

Suggested Citation

  • Rille Raaper, 2021. "Students as ‘Animal Laborans’? Tracing Student Politics in a Marketised Higher Education Setting," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 26(1), pages 130-146, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:26:y:2021:i:1:p:130-146
    DOI: 10.1177/1360780420952810
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1360780420952810
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1360780420952810?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yahya Madra & Fikret Adaman, 2013. "Neoliberal reason and its forms:Depoliticization through economization," Working Papers 2013/07, Bogazici University, Department of Economics.
    2. Guobin Yang, 2016. "Narrative Agency in Hashtag Activism: The Case of #BlackLivesMatter," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(4), pages 13-17.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yue Han & Theodoros Lappas & Gaurav Sabnis, 2020. "The Importance of Interactions Between Content Characteristics and Creator Characteristics for Studying Virality in Social Media," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(2), pages 576-588, June.
    2. Yunhwan Kim & Donghwi Song & Yeon Ju Lee, 2020. "#Antivaccination on Instagram: A Computational Analysis of Hashtag Activism through Photos and Public Responses," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-20, October.
    3. Stephanie L. Chan, 2021. "The Social Value of Public Information When Not Everyone is Privately Informed," Working Papers 2021-09-18, Wang Yanan Institute for Studies in Economics (WISE), Xiamen University.
    4. Bengi Akbulut & Fikret Adaman & Yahya M. Madra, 2015. "The Decimation and Displacement of Development Economics," Working Papers 2015/01, Bogazici University, Department of Economics.
    5. Elona Dhëmbo & Erka Çaro & Julia Hoxha, 2021. "“Our migrant” and “the other migrant”: migration discourse in the Albanian media, 2015–2018," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-10, December.
    6. Imatitikua D. Aiyanyo & Hamman Samuel & Heuiseok Lim, 2021. "Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Classrooms: A Case Study on Foreigners in South Korea Using Applied Machine Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-15, April.
    7. Anne Kaun & Maria Kyriakidou & Julie Uldam, 2016. "Political Agency at the Digital Crossroads?," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(4), pages 1-7.
    8. Anna Maaranen & Janne Tienari, 2020. "Social media and hyper‐masculine work cultures," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(6), pages 1127-1144, November.
    9. Wen Shi & Haohuan Fu & Peinan Wang & Changfeng Chen & Jie Xiong, 2020. "#Climatechange vs. #Globalwarming: Characterizing Two Competing Climate Discourses on Twitter with Semantic Network and Temporal Analyses," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-22, February.
    10. Iago S. Muraro & Kjerstin Thorson & Patricia T. Huddleston, 2023. "Spurring and sustaining online consumer activism: the role of cause support and brand relationship in microlevel action frames," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 30(5), pages 461-477, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:26:y:2021:i:1:p:130-146. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.