IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v13y2023i4p21582440231200935.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Deconstructing Summary Writing: Further Exploration of L2 Reading and Writing

Author

Listed:
  • Jingjing Qin
  • Timothy Groombridge

Abstract

The hybrid nature of reading-to-write tasks calls for more empirical research on understanding the relationship between L2 reading, writing, and proficiency. This study examines summaries written by 46 Emirati university students, who were asked to write a 150-word summary of an expository text on the topic of “consumerism†during class hours. The summary was assessed based on an analytic rubric. It was also assessed quantitatively in terms of the inclusion of the number of important ideas from the source text, namely, content analysis scores. In addition, the students’ language proficiency, reading proficiency, and writing proficiency had already been externally ascertained with their recent IELTS scores. Significantly positive correlations were found between summary scores and IELTS reading scores, IELTS writing scores, and IELTS proficiency scores. Only a significantly positive relationship was found between content analysis scores and IELTS reading scores, but not the IELTS writing scores and IELTS proficiency scores. This implies the importance of enhancing students’ reading, writing, and language proficiency to help them write an effective summary, and reading in itself is insufficient in the production of an effective summary.

Suggested Citation

  • Jingjing Qin & Timothy Groombridge, 2023. "Deconstructing Summary Writing: Further Exploration of L2 Reading and Writing," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:13:y:2023:i:4:p:21582440231200935
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440231200935
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440231200935
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440231200935?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yutthasak Chuenchaichon, 2022. "The Problems of Summary Writing Encountered by Thai EFL Students: A Case Study of the Fourth Year English Major Students at Naresuan University," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 15(6), pages 1-15, July.
    2. Raihana Romly & Shazwani Abd Rahman & Hawa Syamsina Md Supie & Sharifah Nadia Syed Nasharudin, 2018. "Difficulties Encountered by Low Proficiency ESL Students in Reading Online Academic Texts," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 8(2), pages 490-501, February.
    3. Aziza M. Ali & Abu Bakar Razali, 2019. "A Review of Studies on Cognitive and Metacognitive Reading Strategies in Teaching Reading Comprehension for ESL/EFL Learners," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(6), pages 1-94, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bushra Ahmed Khurram, 2023. "The Impact of Metacognitive Instruction on ESL University Level Students’ Awareness and Use of the Reading Strategies," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(2), pages 21582440231, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    L2 proficiency; L2 reading; L2 writing; reading-to-write; summary writing;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L2 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior
    • L2 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior
    • L2 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:13:y:2023:i:4:p:21582440231200935. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.