IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v12y2022i2p21582440221097892.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Classification of Urban Spaces: An Attempt to Classify Al-Baha City Urban Spaces Using Carmona’s Classification

Author

Listed:
  • Abdulaziz Alzahrani

Abstract

Due to an increasingly complex mixture of different types of public spaces and their functions in cities, the role of public spaces can be enhanced to serve users under certain circumstances. This paper examines Carmona’s classification of urban spaces in Al-Baha, Saudi Arabia. Carmona introduces a classification that uses aspects of function, perception, and ownership to distinguish between space types. Twenty urban space types are recognized in four groups, representing a variety from clearly public to private space. The classifications of public spaces will be discussed to arrive at classifications for public spaces based on how public spaces are managed. The article builds an understanding of how such classifications relate to how real public spaces are provided today. In this case study, a Geographic Information System (GIS) map is created for Al-Baha Central District and includes the resulting classifications. From the 119 urban spaces selected to represent this study equally distributed across the study area, there are 12 types that public spaces match Carmona’s classification. The classification of urban spaces for this case study revealed the complexity of public spaces’ nature and the difficulty of distinguishing what is public. Public spaces tend to change and develop over time through other uses and activities. However, the classification of public spaces is a valuable tool that policymakers and planners can use to set comprehensive development plan programs and plan open space strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdulaziz Alzahrani, 2022. "Classification of Urban Spaces: An Attempt to Classify Al-Baha City Urban Spaces Using Carmona’s Classification," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:12:y:2022:i:2:p:21582440221097892
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440221097892
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440221097892
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440221097892?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vikas Mehta, 2014. "Evaluating Public Space," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(1), pages 53-88, January.
    2. Matthew Carmona, 2015. "Re-theorising contemporary public space: a new narrative and a new normative," Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(4), pages 373-405, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Isabelle Soares & Gerd Weitkamp & Claudia Yamu, 2020. "Public Spaces as Knowledgescapes: Understanding the Relationship between the Built Environment and Creative Encounters at Dutch University Campuses and Science Parks," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-30, October.
    2. Sofia Morgado, 2023. "Living on the Edge—Mismatches and Expectations in a Changing Landscape," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-24, January.
    3. Reza Askarizad & Jinliao He, 2022. "Perception of Spatial Legibility and Its Association with Human Mobility Patterns: An Empirical Assessment of the Historical Districts in Rasht, Iran," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-17, November.
    4. Mark Del Aguila & Ensiyeh Ghavampour & Brenda Vale, 2019. "Theory of Place in Public Space," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(2), pages 249-259.
    5. Isabelle Soares & Claudia Yamu & Gerd Weitkamp, 2020. "The Relationship between the Spatial Configuration and the Fourth Sustainable Dimension Creativity in University Campuses: The Case Study of Zernike Campus, Groningen, The Netherlands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-21, November.
    6. Morikawa, So & Aoyama, Miwa & Kato, Hironori, 2023. "Development of railway station plazas: Impact on land prices of surrounding areas," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 1-14.
    7. Boeing, Geoff, 2017. "Methods and Measures for Analyzing Complex Street Networks and Urban Form," SocArXiv 93h82, Center for Open Science.
    8. I-Ting Chuang & Qingqing Chen & Ate Poorthuis, 2023. "Categorizing urban space based on visitor density and diversity: A view through social media data," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 50(6), pages 1471-1485, July.
    9. Kędra, Arleta & Maleszyk, Piotr & Visvizi, Anna, 2023. "Engaging citizens in land use policy in the smart city context," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    10. Tauri Tuvikene & Wladimir Sgibnev & Wojciech Kȩbłowski & Jason Finch, 2023. "Public transport as public space: Introduction," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(15), pages 2963-2978, November.
    11. Alessio Russo & Giuseppe T. Cirella, 2018. "Modern Compact Cities: How Much Greenery Do We Need?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-15, October.
    12. Beata Fabisiak & Anna Jankowska & Robert Kłos, 2020. "Attitudes of Polish Seniors toward the Use of Public Space during the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-17, November.
    13. Pritam Ahirrao & Smita Khan, 2022. "Evaluating public open spaces through the lively planning integrative perspective: a developing country context," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 5225-5257, April.
    14. Loboda Lichtenbaum, Shira & Rosen, Gillad, 2018. "Municipal management of residential collectively owned open space: Exploring the case of Israel," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 762-771.
    15. Sarah Williams & Chaewon Ahn & Hayrettin Gunc & Ege Ozgirin & Michael Pearce & Zhekun Xiong, 2019. "Evaluating sensors for the measurement of public life: A future in image processing," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 46(8), pages 1534-1548, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:12:y:2022:i:2:p:21582440221097892. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.