IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v11y2021i1p21582440211007112.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From Instructed Writing to Free-Writing: A Study of EFL Learners

Author

Listed:
  • Saleh Alharthi

Abstract

Writing is an intricate process that encompasses various factors and is a key skill for English as a Foreign Language (EFL) students. Thus, writing assignments are vital for any curriculum. One of the essential aspects of effective writing includes good grammar knowledge. Advocates of process writing argue that a free-writing journal is a practical approach to teaching EFL students writing. This study is intended to examine the impact of the free-writing journal on EFL learners. This study was conducted on 80 students from a writing course at the University. Thirty-five students were randomly selected to join the free-writing program—the experimental group—and 45 students were kept in their regular structured writing program—the control group. The experimental group selected topics of interest to them and was encouraged to write in English freely without concern for errors, whereas the control group followed a regular structured writing program where the topics were selected for them and they wrote following a clear guideline. Five major areas were investigated to evaluate students’ progress: the number of words written, spelling, capitalization, subject-verb agreement, and punctuation. The researcher conducted semi-structured interviews with 10 students of the experimental group to elicit their perception of the free-writing program. According to the analysis, students in the free-writing program acquired better grammar acquisition than the control group. The researcher also observed students’ perception of free-writing at the end of the study and found that free-writing improved their writing skills.

Suggested Citation

  • Saleh Alharthi, 2021. "From Instructed Writing to Free-Writing: A Study of EFL Learners," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440211, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:11:y:2021:i:1:p:21582440211007112
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440211007112
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440211007112
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440211007112?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fontaine, Philippe, 2014. "Free Riding," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 36(3), pages 359-376, September.
    2. Erkan Cer, 2019. "The Instruction of Writing Strategies: The Effect of the Metacognitive Strategy on the Writing Skills of Pupils in Secondary Education," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(2), pages 21582440198, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ana Margarida Veiga-Simão & Sofia Oliveira & Janete Silva-Moreira & Maria Itália Temudo, 2022. "Assessing the Efficacy and Social Validity of CriaTivo, a Curriculum-Based Intervention to Promote Self-Regulation of Writing in Portuguese Elementary Education," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(3), pages 21582440221, August.
    2. Isaac Kazungu, 2023. "Business Development Services and Participation of Rural-Based Micro Enterprises in Export Markets: Exploring the Heterogeneity of the Tanzanian Handicrafts Industry," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, November.
    3. Ai-hua Chen, 2022. "The Effects of Writing Strategy Instruction on EFL Learners’ Writing Development," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 15(3), pages 1-29, March.
    4. Romaniuc, Rustam, 2017. "Intrinsic motivation in economics: A history," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 56-64.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:11:y:2021:i:1:p:21582440211007112. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.