IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v10y2020i4p2158244020963590.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dependency as Status: Older Adults’ Presentations of Self as Recipients of Care

Author

Listed:
  • Virpi Timonen
  • Luciana Lolich

Abstract

We draw on Bourdieu’s and Goffman’s theories to elaborate the novel idea of dependency as status in old age, a concept that emerged from our Grounded Theory study conducted with 46 older adults (26 women and 20 men) living in and around Dublin, Ireland. The research participants’ portrayals of (in)dependence and assistance reflected their access to and use of social and symbolic (age) capital. Older adults derived social capital from supportive family relations or trusting relationships with formal care providers, and deployed such capital to signal their status as “cared for†individuals. Age capital—constructions of deservingness drawing on advanced age, age-related disabilities, and lifelong contributions—was used by older adults to frame and justify acceptance of help. We argue that where older adults are able to draw on age capital or social capital, they can signal their position as “cared for†individuals who display and acknowledge their dependency, and transform it into a marker of status. Conversely, some participants were keen to present themselves as independent. These participants made downward comparisons with others whom they saw as “worse off†or, in their view, as insufficiently responsible for their own health and well-being. In the contemporary Western frame, dependency is to be avoided at all costs, but we argue that some older people are able to embrace dependency in a way that reflects and demonstrates their status and agency. Care professionals and members of informal networks can make a significant difference to older persons’ acceptance of help, care, and support by offering services in a manner that affirms the care recipients’ worth and agency.

Suggested Citation

  • Virpi Timonen & Luciana Lolich, 2020. "Dependency as Status: Older Adults’ Presentations of Self as Recipients of Care," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(4), pages 21582440209, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:10:y:2020:i:4:p:2158244020963590
    DOI: 10.1177/2158244020963590
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244020963590
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2158244020963590?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christine André & Christoph Hermann, 2009. "Privatisation and Marketisation of Health Care Systems in Europe," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Marica Frangakis & Christoph Hermann & Jörg Huffschmid & Károly Lóránt (ed.), Privatisation against the European Social Model, chapter 9, pages 129-144, Palgrave Macmillan.
    2. Monique A. M. Gignac & Cheryl Cott & Elizabeth M. Badley, 2000. "Adaptation to Chronic Illness and Disability and Its Relationship to Perceptions of Independence and Dependence," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 55(6), pages 362-372.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Clemens Tesch-Römer & Hans-Werner Wahl, 2017. "Toward a More Comprehensive Concept of Successful Aging: Disability and Care Needs," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 72(2), pages 310-318.
    2. Sabina Stan & Roland Erne, 2021. "Time for a paradigm change? Incorporating transnational processes into the analysis of the emerging European health-care system," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 27(3), pages 289-302, August.
    3. Richard Bůžek & Christoph Scheuplein, 2022. "The Global Wealth Chains of Private‐Equity‐Run Physician Practices," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 113(4), pages 331-347, September.
    4. Cyril Benoît, 2023. "The regulatory path to healthcare systems’ financialization," Post-Print hal-04220439, HAL.
    5. Kathy L. Rush & Wilda E. Watts & Janice Stanbury, 2011. "Mobility Adaptations of Older Adults: A Secondary Analysis," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 20(1), pages 81-100, February.
    6. Baffoe-Bonnie, Marilyn S., 2022. "Lived experience with sickle cell disease: Predictors of altruistic participation in clinical research," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 313(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:10:y:2020:i:4:p:2158244020963590. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.