IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v228y2014i6p590-605.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A competing risk model for dependent and imperfect condition–based preventive and corrective maintenances

Author

Listed:
  • Márcio das Chagas Moura
  • Enrique López Droguett
  • Paulo Renato Alves Firmino
  • Ricardo José Ferreira

Abstract

This article develops a model for dependent and imperfect condition–based preventive and corrective maintenance actions. The approach is based on the combination of the intensity proportional repair alert, a competing risks-based model and the generalized renewal process. Typically, intensity proportional repair alert can identify either how preventive actions may modify the distribution of the time between critical failures or how corrective events may change the frequency of preventive maintenances, but this method fails to analyze the effectiveness of the maintenance actions because they are treated as being perfect. On the other hand, generalized renewal process is able to capture the quality of maintenance, classifying it as perfect, minimal or imperfect depending on the value of a rejuvenation parameter. However, generalized renewal process cannot distinguish how different types of maintenance influence each other as intensity proportional repair alert does. Therefore, the intensity proportional repair alert–generalized renewal process hybrid approach is proposed here to fill this gap. This article also develops the maximum likelihood estimators for the proposed model as well as a Monte Carlo–based algorithm to estimate the expected number of preventive and corrective maintenances over time. The proposed model is validated through two example applications for which the intensity proportional repair alert–generalized renewal process model results show close agreement with the failure datasets.

Suggested Citation

  • Márcio das Chagas Moura & Enrique López Droguett & Paulo Renato Alves Firmino & Ricardo José Ferreira, 2014. "A competing risk model for dependent and imperfect condition–based preventive and corrective maintenances," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 228(6), pages 590-605, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:228:y:2014:i:6:p:590-605
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X14540878
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X14540878
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X14540878?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bunea, Cornel & Mazzuchi, Thomas A. & Sarkani, Shahram & Chang, Hai-Chin, 2008. "Application of modern reliability database techniques to military system data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(1), pages 14-27.
    2. Andrés Christen, J. & Ruggeri, Fabrizio & Villa, Enrique, 2011. "Utility based maintenance analysis using a Random Sign censoring model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(3), pages 425-431.
    3. Pham, Hoang & Wang, Hongzhou, 1996. "Imperfect maintenance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(3), pages 425-438, November.
    4. Jiang, R., 2010. "Discrete competing risk model with application to modeling bus-motor failure data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(9), pages 981-988.
    5. Sarhan, Ammar M. & Hamilton, David C. & Smith, B., 2010. "Statistical analysis of competing risks models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(9), pages 953-962.
    6. Moura, Márcio das Chagas & Zio, Enrico & Lins, Isis Didier & Droguett, Enrique, 2011. "Failure and reliability prediction by support vector machines regression of time series data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(11), pages 1527-1534.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. de Oliveira, Cícero Carlos Felix & Firmino, Paulo Renato Alves & Cristino, Cláudio Tadeu, 2019. "A tool for evaluating repairable systems based on Generalized Renewal Processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 281-297.
    2. Xu, Meng & Droguett, Enrique López & Lins, Isis Didier & das Chagas Moura, Márcio, 2017. "On the q-Weibull distribution for reliability applications: An adaptive hybrid artificial bee colony algorithm for parameter estimation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 93-105.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Coolen-Maturi, Tahani & Coolen, Frank P.A., 2014. "Nonparametric predictive inference for combined competing risks data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 87-97.
    2. Gao, Shuzhi & Zhang, Sixuan & Zhang, Yimin & Gao, Yue, 2020. "Operational reliability evaluation and prediction of rolling bearing based on isometric mapping and NoCuSa-LSSVM," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    3. Xiang, Yisha, 2013. "Joint optimization of X¯ control chart and preventive maintenance policies: A discrete-time Markov chain approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 229(2), pages 382-390.
    4. Zhao, Xiujie & He, Shuguang & Xie, Min, 2018. "Utilizing experimental degradation data for warranty cost optimization under imperfect repair," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 108-119.
    5. Izquierdo, J. & Márquez, A. Crespo & Uribetxebarria, J. & Erguido, A., 2020. "On the importance of assessing the operational context impact on maintenance management for life cycle cost of wind energy projects," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 1100-1110.
    6. Seyed Habib A. Rahmati & Abbas Ahmadi & Kannan Govindan, 2018. "A novel integrated condition-based maintenance and stochastic flexible job shop scheduling problem: simulation-based optimization approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 269(1), pages 583-621, October.
    7. Roy, Atin & Chakraborty, Subrata, 2022. "Reliability analysis of structures by a three-stage sequential sampling based adaptive support vector regression model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    8. Guo R. & Ascher H. & Love E., 2001. "Towards Practical and Synthetical Modelling of Repairable Systems," Stochastics and Quality Control, De Gruyter, vol. 16(1), pages 147-182, January.
    9. Kasai, Naoya & Matsuhashi, Shigemi & Sekine, Kazuyoshi, 2013. "Accident occurrence model for the risk analysis of industrialfacilities," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 71-74.
    10. Raouf, BOUCEKKINE & Blanca, MARTINEZ & Cagri, SAGLAM, 2006. "Capital Maintenance Vs Technology Adopton under Embodied Technical Progress," Discussion Papers (ECON - Département des Sciences Economiques) 2006030, Université catholique de Louvain, Département des Sciences Economiques.
    11. Dewan, Isha & Dijoux, Yann, 2015. "Modelling repairable systems with an early life under competing risks and asymmetric virtual age," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 215-224.
    12. Chen, Yiming & Liu, Yu & Jiang, Tao, 2021. "Optimal maintenance strategy for multi-state systems with single maintenance capacity and arbitrarily distributed maintenance time," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    13. Zhengxin Zhang & Xiaosheng Si & Changhua Hu & Xiangyu Kong, 2015. "Degradation modeling–based remaining useful life estimation: A review on approaches for systems with heterogeneity," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 229(4), pages 343-355, August.
    14. Ruey Yeh & Wen Chang & Hui-Chiung Lo, 2010. "Optimal threshold values of age and two-phase maintenance policy for leased equipments using age reduction method," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 181(1), pages 171-183, December.
    15. Shen, Jingyuan & Cui, Lirong & Ma, Yizhong, 2019. "Availability and optimal maintenance policy for systems degrading in dynamic environments," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(1), pages 133-143.
    16. Xiao, Lei & Zhang, Xinghui & Tang, Junxuan & Zhou, Yaqin, 2020. "Joint optimization of opportunistic maintenance and production scheduling considering batch production mode and varying operational conditions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    17. Jackson, Canek & Pascual, Rodrigo, 2008. "Optimal maintenance service contract negotiation with aging equipment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(2), pages 387-398, September.
    18. Lu, Biao & Zhou, Xiaojun, 2017. "Opportunistic preventive maintenance scheduling for serial-parallel multistage manufacturing systems with multiple streams of deterioration," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 116-127.
    19. Bebbington, Mark & Lai, Chin-Diew & Zitikis, RiÄ ardas, 2009. "Balancing burn-in and mission times in environments with catastrophic and repairable failures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(8), pages 1314-1321.
    20. Nourelfath, Mustapha & Nahas, Nabil & Ben-Daya, Mohamed, 2016. "Integrated preventive maintenance and production decisions for imperfect processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 21-31.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:228:y:2014:i:6:p:590-605. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.