IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/padigm/v27y2023i1p27-46.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Legal Underpinnings Drive ESG Amidst Global Flux

Author

Listed:
  • Rahul Gossain

Abstract

The paper studies the complex global dynamics governing Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG), including the evolving scope and structures of ESG frameworks. The impact of the significant expansion in the scope and spread of legal underpinnings over the last decade studied along with the increase in strategic applications of ESG like risk management. There is specific focus on developments the European Union, and an assessment of the impact of the changing ESG and regulatory scenario on India. The accelerated alignment of reporting standards, post the release of Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) guidelines has been complemented by legal and regulatory progress globally. The gradual development of legal underpinnings has put ESG or business sustainability on a stronger footing, by providing binding mandates to transition towards sustainability, albeit in varying in strength and forms across jurisdictions. The paper studies the development of these legal underpinnings and analyses how it has been critical in ensuring progress on the ESG front. These were critical in ensuring progress continued despite significant headwinds emerging of the Ukraine War and COVID-19, albeit in a slower but sustained manner. This contrasted with the scenario over the last four decades wherein vested interests could easily derail progress on climate change fronts in the absence of the legal underpinnings and binding mandates. This analysis is based on study of recent sustainability mechanisms, including a study of the architecture of the Paris Agreement, the TCFD guidelines, the compliance-based European Union (EU) Sustainability Action Plan in EU, and other international regulatory developments, including India’s BRSR and the recent regulatory proposals by RBI and SEBI etc. Global financial investors’ strong push for ESG based risk-assessment and investments is analysed along with the introduction of mandated ESG compliances for businesses and trade is pushing companies and countries with older ESG standards to respond, which has important implication for India and Indian businesses.

Suggested Citation

  • Rahul Gossain, 2023. "Legal Underpinnings Drive ESG Amidst Global Flux," Paradigm, , vol. 27(1), pages 27-46, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:padigm:v:27:y:2023:i:1:p:27-46
    DOI: 10.1177/09718907231173333
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09718907231173333
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09718907231173333?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vincent G. Whitelock, 2019. "Multidimensional environmental social governance sustainability framework: Integration, using a purchasing, operations, and supply chain management context," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(5), pages 923-931, September.
    2. Gaurav Talan & Gagan Deep Sharma, 2019. "Doing Well by Doing Good: A Systematic Review and Research Agenda for Sustainable Investment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-16, January.
    3. Sakis Kotsantonis & George Serafeim, 2019. "Four Things No One Will Tell You About ESG Data," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 31(2), pages 50-58, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. José Luis Miralles-Quirós & María Mar Miralles-Quirós & José Manuel Nogueira, 2020. "Sustainable Development Goals and Investment Strategies: The Profitability of Using Five-Factor Fama-French Alphas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-16, February.
    2. Xiao-Guang Yue & Yan Han & Deimante Teresiene & Justina Merkyte & Wei Liu, 2020. "Sustainable Funds’ Performance Evaluation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-20, September.
    3. Hasmik V. Khachatryan, 2022. "Divergence of ESG Ratings: Foreign Regulatory Trends," Finansovyj žhurnal — Financial Journal, Financial Research Institute, Moscow 125375, Russia, issue 5, pages 89-104, October.
    4. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/7fsnj6af7v9ncrf76qn5p5on9e is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Michele Fioretti, 2022. "Caring or Pretending to Care? Social Impact, Firms' Objectives, and Welfare (former title: Social Responsibility and Firm's Objectives)," SciencePo Working papers hal-03393065, HAL.
    6. Jost, Sébastien & Erben, Saskia & Ottenstein, Philipp & Zülch, Henning, 2022. "Does corporate social responsibility impact mergers & acquisition premia? New international evidence," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 46(PA).
    7. Kumari Juddoo & Issam Malki & Sudha Mathew & Sheeja Sivaprasad, 2023. "An impact investment strategy," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 61(1), pages 177-211, July.
    8. Ramiz ur Rehman & Muhammad Zain ul Abidin & Rizwan Ali & Safwan Mohd Nor & Muhammad Akram Naseem & Mudassar Hasan & Muhammad Ishfaq Ahmad, 2021. "The Integration of Conventional Equity Indices with Environmental, Social, and Governance Indices: Evidence from Emerging Economies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-27, January.
    9. Divya Anantharaman & Feng Gao & Hariom Manchiraju, 2022. "Does social responsibility begin at home? The relation between firms’ pension policies and corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 76-121, March.
    10. Piera Centobelli & Roberto Cerchione & Eugenio Oropallo & Wael Hassan El‐Garaihy & Tamer Farag & Khalid Hassan Al Shehri, 2022. "Towards a sustainable development assessment framework to bridge supply chain practices and technologies," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(4), pages 647-663, August.
    11. Patrick Velte, 2022. "Does sustainable corporate governance have an impact on materiality disclosure quality in integrated reporting? International evidence," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(6), pages 1655-1670, December.
    12. Yanqi Sun, 2023. "Can the innovation in sustainability disclosures reflect organisational sustainable development? An integrated reporting perspective from China," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(3), pages 1668-1680, June.
    13. Gregory, Richard Paul, 2022. "ESG activities and firm cash flow," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    14. Billio, Monica & Costola, Michele & Hristova, Iva & Latino, Carmelo & Pelizzon, Loriana, 2022. "Sustainable finance: A journey toward ESG and climate risk," SAFE Working Paper Series 349, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE.
    15. Mansi Jain & Gagan Deep Sharma & Mrinalini Srivastava, 2019. "Can Sustainable Investment Yield Better Financial Returns: A Comparative Study of ESG Indices and MSCI Indices," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-18, February.
    16. Felipe Arias Fogliano de Souza Cunha & Erick Meira de Oliveira & Renato J. Orsato & Marcelo Cabus Klotzle & Fernando Luiz Cyrino Oliveira & Rodrigo Goyannes Gusmão Caiado, 2020. "Can sustainable investments outperform traditional benchmarks? Evidence from global stock markets," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 682-697, February.
    17. Press, Melea & Brzeszczyński, Janusz, 2022. "Do business models matter?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).
    18. Burger, Eric & Grba, Fabian & Heidorn, Thomas, 2022. "The impact of ESG ratings on implied and historical volatility," Frankfurt School - Working Paper Series 230, Frankfurt School of Finance and Management.
    19. Bogna Janik & Katarzyna Maruszewska, 2020. "Valuation of the Environmental Effects of Socially Responsible Investments in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-18, November.
    20. Ilze Zumente & Nataļja Lāce, 2021. "ESG Rating—Necessity for the Investor or the Company?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-14, August.
    21. Sharma, Gagan Deep & Tiwari, Aviral Kumar & Talan, Gaurav & Jain, Mansi, 2021. "Revisiting the sustainable versus conventional investment dilemma in COVID-19 times," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:padigm:v:27:y:2023:i:1:p:27-46. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.