IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v45y2025i4p426-436.html

The Effect of a Surgeon Communication Strategy on Treatment Preference for Thyroid Cancer: A Randomized Trial

Author

Listed:
  • Catherine B. Jensen

    (University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI, USA
    University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
    National Clinician Scholars Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA)

  • Brandy Sinco

    (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA)

  • Megan C. Saucke

    (University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI, USA)

  • Kyle J. Bushaw

    (University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI, USA)

  • Alexis G. Antunez

    (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
    Brigham & Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA)

  • Corrine I. Voils

    (University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI, USA
    William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Madison, WI, USA)

  • Susan C. Pitt

    (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA)

Abstract

Background Cancer diagnosis causes emotional distress, which can influence patients’ treatment choice. This study aimed to investigate the effect of increased emotionally supportive surgeon communication in a virtual setting on treatment preference for thyroid cancer. Design This randomized trial (NCT05132478), conducted from November 2021 to February 2023, enrolled adults with ≤4-cm thyroid nodules not requiring surgery. Participants were randomized 1:1 to watch a virtual clinic visit depicting a patient–surgeon treatment discussion for low-risk thyroid cancer. Control and intervention videos were identical except for added emotionally supportive communication in the intervention. The primary outcome was treatment preference for total thyroidectomy or lobectomy. Secondary outcomes were perceived physician empathy, physician trust, decisional confidence, and disease-specific knowledge. An intention-to-treat analysis was performed using conditional regression to account for stratification by sex. Qualitative content analysis evaluated participants’ open-ended responses about treatment choice and surgeon communication. Results Of 208 eligible patients, 118 (56.7%) participated. Participants were 85.6% female and 88.1% White. Overall, 89.0% ( n  = 105) of participants preferred lobectomy, which was similar between the intervention and control groups (90.0% v. 87.9%, respectively, P  = 0.72). Compared with control, participants who viewed the consultation with enhanced communication perceived higher levels of physician empathy (34.5 ± 5.8 v. 25.9 ± 9.1, P  

Suggested Citation

  • Catherine B. Jensen & Brandy Sinco & Megan C. Saucke & Kyle J. Bushaw & Alexis G. Antunez & Corrine I. Voils & Susan C. Pitt, 2025. "The Effect of a Surgeon Communication Strategy on Treatment Preference for Thyroid Cancer: A Randomized Trial," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 45(4), pages 426-436, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:45:y:2025:i:4:p:426-436
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X251325837
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X251325837
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X251325837?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael C. Silverstein & Clara N. Lee & Laura D. Scherer & Crystal Phommasathit & Andrea L. Merrill & Ellen Peters, 2023. "Operating on Anxiety: Negative Affect toward Breast Cancer and Choosing Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 43(2), pages 152-163, February.
    2. Barry, Christine A. & Stevenson, Fiona A. & Britten, Nicky & Barber, Nick & Bradley, Colin P., 2001. "Giving voice to the lifeworld. More humane, more effective medical care? A qualitative study of doctor-patient communication in general practice," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 53(4), pages 487-505, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. May, Carl & Rapley, Tim & Moreira, Tiago & Finch, Tracy & Heaven, Ben, 2006. "Technogovernance: Evidence, subjectivity, and the clinical encounter in primary care medicine," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(4), pages 1022-1030, February.
    2. Weiste, Elina & Peräkylä, Anssi & Valkeapää, Taina & Savander, Enikö & Hintikka, Jukka, 2018. "Institutionalised otherness: Patients references to psychiatric diagnostic categories," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 71-79.
    3. Sarah Jane Brubaker, 2024. "Toward a Critical Sociology of Campus Sexual Assault: Victim Advocacy as the Lifeworld Resisting the System," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-16, February.
    4. Leanza, Yvan & Boivin, Isabelle & Rosenberg, Ellen, 2010. "Interruptions and resistance: A comparison of medical consultations with family and trained interpreters," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 70(12), pages 1888-1895, June.
    5. Glauzy, Antoine & Montlahuc-Vannod, Aude, 2025. "The voice of sacrifice: The silence of healthcare professionals in the service of productivity. The case of a French hospital," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 377(C).
    6. Doblytė, Sigita, 2022. "The vicious cycle of distrust: Access, quality, and efficiency within a post-communist mental health system," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    7. Murdoch, Jamie & Salter, Charlotte & Ford, John & Lenaghan, Elizabeth & Shiner, Alice & Steel, Nicholas, 2020. "The “unknown territory” of goal-setting: Negotiating a novel interactional activity within primary care doctor-patient consultations for patients with multiple chronic conditions," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    8. Daker-White, Gavin & Rogers, Anne & Kennedy, Anne & Blakeman, Thomas & Blickem, Christian & Chew-Graham, Carolyn, 2015. "Non-disclosure of chronic kidney disease in primary care and the limits of instrumental rationality in chronic illness self-management," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 31-39.
    9. Glauzy, Antoine, 2025. "Silence as a manner within the doctor's epistemic posture during the diagnostic process: A case study in a French hospital," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 378(C).
    10. Fudge, Nina & Swinglehurst, Deborah, 2022. "Keeping in balance on the multimorbidity tightrope: A narrative analysis of older patients’ experiences of living with and managing multimorbidity," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    11. Hardman, Doug & Geraghty, Adam W.A. & Lown, Mark & Bishop, Felicity L., 2020. "Subjunctive medicine: Enacting efficacy in general practice," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    12. Gately, Claire & Rogers, Anne & Sanders, Caroline, 2007. "Re-thinking the relationship between long-term condition self-management education and the utilisation of health services," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(5), pages 934-945, September.
    13. Lo, Ming-Cheng Miriam & Bahar, Roxana, 2013. "Resisting the colonization of the lifeworld? Immigrant patients' experiences with co-ethnic healthcare workers," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 68-76.
    14. Jennifer Watermeyer & Victoria Hume & Tshegofatso Seabi & Bruno Pauly, 2020. "“It’s got its own life, and you can’t contain it”: A qualitative study of patient and health professional experiences of diabetes care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(1-2), pages 240-250, January.
    15. Ariss, Steven M., 2009. "Asymmetrical knowledge claims in general practice consultations with frequently attending patients: Limitations and opportunities for patient participation," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 69(6), pages 908-919, September.
    16. Martin, Graham P. & Chew, Sarah & Dixon-Woods, Mary, 2021. "Why do systems for responding to concerns and complaints so often fail patients, families and healthcare staff? A qualitative study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 287(C).
    17. Lynch, Johanna M. & Askew, Deborah A. & Mitchell, Geoffrey K. & Hegarty, Kelsey L., 2012. "Beyond symptoms: Defining primary care mental health clinical assessment priorities, content and process," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(2), pages 143-149.
    18. Waring, Justin & Latif, Asam & Boyd, Matthew & Barber, Nick & Elliott, Rachel, 2016. "Pastoral power in the community pharmacy: A Foucauldian analysis of services to promote patient adherence to new medicine use," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 123-130.
    19. Williams, Kevin Frank, 2007. "Re-examining 'professionalism' in pharmacy: A South African perspective," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 64(6), pages 1285-1296, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:45:y:2025:i:4:p:426-436. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.