IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v32y2012i1pe20-e24.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Health Technology Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Paul Glasziou

Abstract

A challenge of health technology assessment is integrating the information from different disciplines. This talk focuses on the evidence-based medicine perspective and challenges 3 assumptions of health technology assessment: assumptions about effectiveness, assumptions about coverage by health technology assessment, and assumptions about costs being immutable. Challenging these assumptions has several implications. First is the need for better evidence on effects: both low-volume, high-cost technologies and low-cost, high-volume technologies that are ineffective drains on health care systems’ resources. Second, cheap but effective technologies should be better promoted, as they can displace high-cost technologies. Finally, for effective but expensive technologies, we should work to lower the price and/or costs.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul Glasziou, 2012. "Health Technology Assessment," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 32(1), pages 20-24, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:32:y:2012:i:1:p:e20-e24
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X11424925
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X11424925
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X11424925?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yong Kim, Jim & Shakow, Aaron & Mate, Kedar & Vanderwarker, Chris & Gupta, Rajesh & Farmer, Paul, 2005. "Limited good and limited vision: multidrug-resistant tuberculosis and global health policy," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 61(4), pages 847-859, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. M. Beaulieu & P. Lehoux, 2019. "The emergence of health technology organizations among institutional healthcare and economic actors," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 1115-1151, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Engel, Nora, 2009. "Innovation Dynamics in Tuberculosis Control in India: The Shift to New Partnerships," MERIT Working Papers 2009-040, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    2. Austin, Kelly F. & DeScisciolo, Cristina & Samuelsen, Lene, 2016. "The Failures of Privatization: A Comparative Investigation of Tuberculosis Rates and the Structure of Healthcare in Less-Developed Nations, 1995–2010," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 450-460.
    3. McLaren, Z. & Burger, R., 2016. "A New Econometric Method for Estimating Disease Prevalence: An Application to Multi-Drug Resistant Tuberculosis," Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) Working Papers 16/26, HEDG, c/o Department of Economics, University of York.
    4. Amitabh Chandra & Anupam B. Jena & Jonathan S. Skinner, 2011. "The Pragmatist's Guide to Comparative Effectiveness Research," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 25(2), pages 27-46, Spring.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:32:y:2012:i:1:p:e20-e24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.