IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v20y2000i3p314-322.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Representing Both First- and Second-order Uncertainties by Monte Carlo Simulation for Groups of Patients

Author

Listed:
  • Elkan F. Halpern
  • Milton C. Weinstein
  • Maria G.M. Hunink
  • G. Scott Gazelle

Abstract

Actual implementation of probabilistic sensitivity analysis may lead to misleading or improper conclusions when it is applied to groups of patients rather than individual patients. The practice of combining first- and second-order simulations when modeling the outcome for a group of more than one patient yields an erroneous marginal distribution whenever the parameter values are randomly sampled for each patient while the results are presented as simulated means for the group of patients. This practice results in underrepresenting the second-order uncertainty. It may also distort the shape (especially the symmetry or extent of the tails) in the simulated distribution. As a result, it may lead to premature or incorrect conclusions of superiority. It may also result in inappropriate estimates of the value of further research to inform parameter values. Key words: Simulation; probabilistic sensitivity analysis; Monte Carlo; confidence interval ; cost-effectiveness; implementation. (Med Decis Making 2000;20:314-322)

Suggested Citation

  • Elkan F. Halpern & Milton C. Weinstein & Maria G.M. Hunink & G. Scott Gazelle, 2000. "Representing Both First- and Second-order Uncertainties by Monte Carlo Simulation for Groups of Patients," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 20(3), pages 314-322, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:20:y:2000:i:3:p:314-322
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X0002000308
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X0002000308
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X0002000308?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Neale Cohen & Michael Minshall & Lyn Sharon-Nash & Katerina Zakrzewska & William Valentine & Andrew Palmer, 2007. "Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion versus Multiple Daily Injections of Insulin," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 25(10), pages 881-897, October.
    2. Sarazin, Gabriel & Morio, Jérôme & Lagnoux, Agnès & Balesdent, Mathieu & Brevault, Loïc, 2021. "Reliability-oriented sensitivity analysis in presence of data-driven epistemic uncertainty," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    3. Montserrat Vera-Llonch & Ellen Dukes & Javier Rejas & Oleg Sofrygin & Marko Mychaskiw & Gerry Oster, 2010. "Cost-effectiveness of pregabalin versus venlafaxine in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder: findings from a Spanish perspective," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 11(1), pages 35-44, February.
    4. Marta O. Soares & Luísa Canto e Castro, 2012. "Continuous Time Simulation and Discretized Models for Cost-Effectiveness Analysis," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 30(12), pages 1101-1117, December.
    5. Elizabeth G Bond & Lusine Abrahamyan & Mohammad K A Khan & Andrea Gershon & Murray Krahn & Ping Li & Rajibul Mian & Nicholas Mitsakakis & Mohsen Sadatsafavi & Teresa To & Petros Pechlivanoglou & for t, 2020. "Understanding resource utilization and mortality in COPD to support policy making: A microsimulation study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-16, August.
    6. Mehdi Najafzadeh & Carlo Marra & Eleni Galanis & David Patrick, 2009. "Cost Effectiveness of Herpes Zoster Vaccine in Canada," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 27(12), pages 991-1004, December.
    7. Sankararaman, Shankar & Mahadevan, Sankaran, 2011. "Likelihood-based representation of epistemic uncertainty due to sparse point data and/or interval data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(7), pages 814-824.
    8. Sandra Tunis & Luc Sauriol & Michael Minshall, 2010. "Cost effectiveness of insulin glargine plus oral antidiabetes drugs compared with premixed insulin alone in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Canada," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 8(4), pages 267-280, July.
    9. Vinaytosh Mishra & Mohita G. Sharma, 2020. "Understanding Humanitarian Supply Chain Through Causal Modelling," South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases, , vol. 9(3), pages 317-329, December.
    10. Niklas Zethraeus & Magnus Johannesson & Bengt Jönsson & Mickael Löthgren & Magnus Tambour, 2003. "Advantages of Using the Net-Benefit Approach for Analysing Uncertainty in Economic Evaluation Studies," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 39-48, January.
    11. Marta Soares & Luísa Canto e Castro, 2012. "Continuous Time Simulation and Discretized Models for Cost-Effectiveness Analysis," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 30(12), pages 1101-1117, December.
    12. Sun-Young Kim & Sue Goldie, 2008. "Cost-Effectiveness Analyses of Vaccination Programmes," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 191-215, March.
    13. Marta O Soares & L Canto e Castro, 2010. "Simulation or cohort models? Continuous time simulation and discretized Markov models to estimate cost-effectiveness," Working Papers 056cherp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
    14. Luyi Li & Zhenzhou Lu, 2016. "A new algorithm for importance analysis of the inputs with distribution parameter uncertainty," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(13), pages 3065-3077, October.
    15. Cannon, Jeffrey W. & Mueller, Ute A. & Hornbuckle, Janet & Larson, Ann & Simmer, Karen & Newnham, John P. & Doherty, Dorota A., 2013. "Economic implications of poor access to antenatal care in rural and remote Western Australian Aboriginal communities: An individual sampling model of pregnancy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 226(2), pages 313-324.
    16. Sankararaman, S. & Mahadevan, S., 2013. "Separating the contributions of variability and parameter uncertainty in probability distributions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 187-199.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:20:y:2000:i:3:p:314-322. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.