IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jedbes/v51y2026i2p419-450.html

Using the Bayesian Network’s Structural Learning Algorithm to Estimate the Q-Matrix in Cognitive Diagnosis Models

Author

Listed:
  • Ling Ling Wang

    (Shenyang Normal University)

  • Tao Xin

    (Beijing Normal University)

  • Xiao Jian Sun

    (Southwest University)

Abstract

In cognitive diagnostic assessment, a Q matrix that associates each item with cognitive attributes in a test is necessary to derive the knowledge states of students. Defining the Q matrix is the most fundamental step in cognitive diagnosis. The conventional method for calibrating cognitive attributes relies mainly on the subjective judgments of experts. Herein, a method that uses a structural learning algorithm in a Bayesian network (BN) to estimate the Q matrix is proposed. Both the viability and efficacy of the suggested approach are examined by running simulations and conducting analyses on real data. The outcomes of the simulations indicate that the proposed approach mostly exceeds the performance of the available methods, and its advantages stem from not only better estimation accuracy but also its computational efficiency. The efficiency of the proposed approach is also verified via real data analysis. Compared with the stepwise method, the model data fits the estimated Q matrix via the BN method for the empirical data is more satisfactory, and the Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) is lower. Consequently, this Q-matrix estimation method based on a BN can improve accuracy and computational efficiency and promote the practice of cognitive diagnosis assessment.

Suggested Citation

  • Ling Ling Wang & Tao Xin & Xiao Jian Sun, 2026. "Using the Bayesian Network’s Structural Learning Algorithm to Estimate the Q-Matrix in Cognitive Diagnosis Models," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 51(2), pages 419-450, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:51:y:2026:i:2:p:419-450
    DOI: 10.3102/10769986251334789
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3102/10769986251334789
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3102/10769986251334789?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michel Philipp & Carolin Strobl & Jimmy de la Torre & Achim Zeileis, 2018. "On the Estimation of Standard Errors in Cognitive Diagnosis Models," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 43(1), pages 88-115, February.
    2. Steven Andrew Culpepper, 2019. "Estimating the Cognitive Diagnosis $$\varvec{Q}$$ Q Matrix with Expert Knowledge: Application to the Fraction-Subtraction Dataset," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 84(2), pages 333-357, June.
    3. Chia-Yi Chiu & Jeffrey Douglas & Xiaodong Li, 2009. "Cluster Analysis for Cognitive Diagnosis: Theory and Applications," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 74(4), pages 633-665, December.
    4. Susan Embretson (Whitely), 1984. "A general latent trait model for response processes," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 49(2), pages 175-186, June.
    5. Gongjun Xu & Zhuoran Shang, 2018. "Identifying Latent Structures in Restricted Latent Class Models," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 113(523), pages 1284-1295, July.
    6. Jimmy de la Torre, 2011. "The Generalized DINA Model Framework," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 76(2), pages 179-199, April.
    7. Chenchen Ma & Jing Ouyang & Gongjun Xu, 2023. "Learning Latent and Hierarchical Structures in Cognitive Diagnosis Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 88(1), pages 175-207, March.
    8. Scutari, Marco, 2010. "Learning Bayesian Networks with the bnlearn R Package," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 35(i03).
    9. Yinyin Chen & Steven Culpepper & Feng Liang, 2020. "A Sparse Latent Class Model for Cognitive Diagnosis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 85(1), pages 121-153, March.
    10. Chia-Yi Chiu & Jeff Douglas, 2013. "A Nonparametric Approach to Cognitive Diagnosis by Proximity to Ideal Response Patterns," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 30(2), pages 225-250, July.
    11. Carolyn Anderson & Hsiu-Ting Yu, 2007. "Log-Multiplicative Association Models as Item Response Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 72(1), pages 5-23, March.
    12. Jimmy Torre, 2011. "Erratum to: The Generalized DINA Model Framework," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 76(3), pages 510-510, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kazuhiro Yamaguchi & Jonathan Templin, 2022. "Direct Estimation of Diagnostic Classification Model Attribute Mastery Profiles via a Collapsed Gibbs Sampling Algorithm," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 87(4), pages 1390-1421, December.
    2. James Joseph Balamuta & Steven Andrew Culpepper, 2022. "Exploratory Restricted Latent Class Models with Monotonicity Requirements under PÒLYA–GAMMA Data Augmentation," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 87(3), pages 903-945, September.
    3. Kazuhiro Yamaguchi, 2025. "Bayesian Diagnostic Classification Models for a Partially Known Q-Matrix," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 50(2), pages 331-382, April.
    4. Chenchen Ma & Jimmy Torre & Gongjun Xu, 2023. "Bridging Parametric and Nonparametric Methods in Cognitive Diagnosis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 88(1), pages 51-75, March.
    5. Motonori Oka & Kensuke Okada, 2023. "Scalable Bayesian Approach for the Dina Q-Matrix Estimation Combining Stochastic Optimization and Variational Inference," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 88(1), pages 302-331, March.
    6. Steven Andrew Culpepper, 2023. "A Note on Weaker Conditions for Identifying Restricted Latent Class Models for Binary Responses," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 88(1), pages 158-174, March.
    7. Kazuhiro Yamaguchi & Jonathan Templin, 2022. "A Gibbs Sampling Algorithm with Monotonicity Constraints for Diagnostic Classification Models," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 39(1), pages 24-54, March.
    8. Kazuhiro Yamaguchi & Kensuke Okada, 2020. "Variational Bayes Inference for the DINA Model," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 45(5), pages 569-597, October.
    9. Yuqi Gu, 2024. "Going Deep in Diagnostic Modeling: Deep Cognitive Diagnostic Models (DeepCDMs)," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 89(1), pages 118-150, March.
    10. Daoxuan Fu & Chunying Qin & Zhaosheng Luo & Yujun Li & Xiaofeng Yu & Ziyu Ye, 2025. "Using Regularized Methods to Validate Q-Matrix in Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 50(1), pages 149-179, February.
    11. Kazuhiro Yamaguchi, 2023. "Bayesian Analysis Methods for Two-Level Diagnosis Classification Models," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 48(6), pages 773-809, December.
    12. Yinghan Chen & Ying Liu & Steven Andrew Culpepper & Yuguo Chen, 2021. "Inferring the Number of Attributes for the Exploratory DINA Model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 86(1), pages 30-64, March.
    13. Seunghyun Lee & Yuqi Gu, 2024. "New Paradigm of Identifiable General-response Cognitive Diagnostic Models: Beyond Categorical Data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 89(4), pages 1304-1336, December.
    14. Chen, Yunxiao & Li, Xiaoou & Liu, Jingchen & Ying, Zhiliang, 2025. "Item response theory—a statistical framework for educational and psychological measurement," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 120810, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    15. Mengqi Lin & Gongjun Xu, 2024. "Sufficient and Necessary Conditions for the Identifiability of DINA Models with Polytomous Responses," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 89(2), pages 717-740, June.
    16. Ying Liu & Steven Andrew Culpepper, 2024. "Restricted Latent Class Models for Nominal Response Data: Identifiability and Estimation," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 89(2), pages 592-625, June.
    17. Chenchen Ma & Jing Ouyang & Gongjun Xu, 2023. "Learning Latent and Hierarchical Structures in Cognitive Diagnosis Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 88(1), pages 175-207, March.
    18. Peida Zhan & Wen-Chung Wang & Xiaomin Li, 2020. "A Partial Mastery, Higher-Order Latent Structural Model for Polytomous Attributes in Cognitive Diagnostic Assessments," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 37(2), pages 328-351, July.
    19. Kazuhiro Yamaguchi & Kensuke Okada, 2020. "Variational Bayes Inference Algorithm for the Saturated Diagnostic Classification Model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 85(4), pages 973-995, December.
    20. Chia-Yi Chiu & Yuan-Pei Chang, 2021. "Advances in CD-CAT: The General Nonparametric Item Selection Method," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 86(4), pages 1039-1057, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:51:y:2026:i:2:p:419-450. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.