IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jedbes/v47y2022i2p167-201.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Obtaining Interpretable Parameters From Reparameterized Longitudinal Models: Transformation Matrices Between Growth Factors in Two Parameter Spaces

Author

Listed:
  • Jin Liu
  • Robert A. Perera
  • Le Kang
  • Roy T. Sabo

    (Department of Biostatistics, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA)

  • Robert M. Kirkpatrick

    (Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA)

Abstract

This study proposes transformation functions and matrices between coefficients in the original and reparameterized parameter spaces for an existing linear-linear piecewise model to derive the interpretable coefficients directly related to the underlying change pattern. Additionally, the study extends the existing model to allow individual measurement occasions and investigates predictors for individual differences in change patterns. We present the proposed methods with simulation studies and a real-world data analysis. Our simulation study demonstrates that the method can generally provide an unbiased and accurate point estimate and appropriate confidence interval coverage for each parameter. The empirical analysis shows that the model can estimate the growth factor coefficients and path coefficients directly related to the underlying developmental process, thereby providing meaningful interpretation.

Suggested Citation

  • Jin Liu & Robert A. Perera & Le Kang & Roy T. Sabo & Robert M. Kirkpatrick, 2022. "Obtaining Interpretable Parameters From Reparameterized Longitudinal Models: Transformation Matrices Between Growth Factors in Two Parameter Spaces," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 47(2), pages 167-201, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:47:y:2022:i:2:p:167-201
    DOI: 10.3102/10769986211052009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3102/10769986211052009
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3102/10769986211052009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eric F. Lock & Nidhi Kohli & Maitreyee Bose, 2018. "Detecting Multiple Random Changepoints in Bayesian Piecewise Growth Mixture Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 83(3), pages 733-750, September.
    2. Stephen Toit & Robert Cudeck, 2009. "Estimation of the Nonlinear Random Coefficient Model when Some Random Effects Are Separable," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 74(1), pages 65-82, March.
    3. Asher Tishler & Isreal Zang, 1981. "A Maximum Likelihood Method for Piecewise Regression Models with a Continuous Dependent Variable," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 30(2), pages 116-124, June.
    4. G. Muniz Terrera & A. van den Hout & F. E. Matthews, 2011. "Random change point models: investigating cognitive decline in the presence of missing data," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(4), pages 705-716, November.
    5. Chou, Chih-Ping & Yang, Dongyun & Pentz, Mary Ann & Hser, Yih-Ing, 2004. "Piecewise growth curve modeling approach for longitudinal prevention study," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 213-225, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eric F. Lock & Nidhi Kohli & Maitreyee Bose, 2018. "Detecting Multiple Random Changepoints in Bayesian Piecewise Growth Mixture Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 83(3), pages 733-750, September.
    2. Nicholas J. Rockwood, 2020. "Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Multilevel Structural Equation Models with Random Slopes for Latent Covariates," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 85(2), pages 275-300, June.
    3. Jolynn Pek & Hao Wu, 2015. "Profile Likelihood-Based Confidence Intervals and Regions for Structural Equation Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(4), pages 1123-1145, December.
    4. Ricarda Steinmayr & Patrick Paschke & Linda Wirthwein, 2022. "Elementary School Students’ Subjective Well-Being Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Longitudinal Study," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 23(6), pages 2985-3005, August.
    5. Jeffrey R. Harring, 2009. "A Nonlinear Mixed Effects Model for Latent Variables," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 34(3), pages 293-318, September.
    6. Daniel McNeish & Denis Dumas & Dario Torre & Neil Rice, 2022. "Modelling time to maximum competency in medical student progress tests," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 185(4), pages 2007-2034, October.
    7. Shelley A. Blozis, 2022. "A Latent Variable Mixed-Effects Location Scale Model with an Application to Daily Diary Data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 87(4), pages 1548-1570, December.
    8. Daniel Y. Lee & Jeffrey R. Harring, 2023. "Handling Missing Data in Growth Mixture Models," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 48(3), pages 320-348, June.
    9. Daniel McNeish & Denis Dumas, 2021. "A seasonal dynamic measurement model for summer learning loss," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 184(2), pages 616-642, April.
    10. Nicholas J. Rockwood, 2021. "Efficient Likelihood Estimation of Generalized Structural Equation Models with a Mix of Normal and Nonnormal Responses," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 86(2), pages 642-667, June.
    11. van den Hout, Ardo & Muniz-Terrera, Graciela & Matthews, Fiona E., 2013. "Change point models for cognitive tests using semi-parametric maximum likelihood," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 684-698.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:47:y:2022:i:2:p:167-201. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.