IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/intstu/v48y2011i3-4p317-324.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is Unipolarity Peaceful?

Author

Listed:
  • Maximilian Terhalle

Abstract

Unipolarity is more peaceful than what theorists predict. In causal terms, its dynamics might be less unidirectional than what is often assumed. First, contrary to Monteiro’s assumption, the character of today’s aggregation mechanisms is not adversarial. This is because the nature of polarity has changed over time. Second, in contrast to domestic alliance aspects, Monteiro’s structural inclinations lead him to overlook the importance of domestic politics when analyzing the targets of the unipole’s ‘temptation to re-engineer the system’. Third, since Monteiro believes that wars against smaller states are very likely, he seems to assume a deterministic stance, thereby leaving no room for US diplomacy to reject such determinism at opportune moments. Finally, neglecting economic aspects, Monteiro does not recognize the socio-political effects of the security-economics nexus on smaller states.

Suggested Citation

  • Maximilian Terhalle, 2011. "Is Unipolarity Peaceful?," International Studies, , vol. 48(3-4), pages 317-324, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:intstu:v:48:y:2011:i:3-4:p:317-324
    DOI: 10.1177/0020881713485025
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020881713485025
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0020881713485025?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gilpin, Robert G., 1984. "The richness of the tradition of political realism," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 38(02), pages 287-304, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marieke Kleiboer, 1996. "Understanding Success and Failure of International Mediation," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 40(2), pages 360-389, June.
    2. Abb, Pascal, 2013. "What Drives Interstate Balancing? Estimations of Domestic and Systemic Factors," GIGA Working Papers 238, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
    3. Alden, Christopher & le Pere, Garth, 2023. "Southern multilateralism from IBSA to NDB: synergies, continuities, and regional options," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 119700, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Zeev Maoz, 1995. "National Preferences, International Structures and Balance-of-Power Politics," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 7(3), pages 369-394, July.
    5. Sergio Mariotti, 2022. "A warning from the Russian–Ukrainian war: avoiding a future that rhymes with the past," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 49(4), pages 761-782, December.
    6. Kratochvíl, Petr & Tichý, Lukáš, 2013. "EU and Russian discourse on energy relations," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 391-406.
    7. Kaminski Joseph Jon, 2019. "Rethinking Realism and Constructivism Through the Lenses of Themes and Ontological Primacy," Croatian International Relations Review, Sciendo, vol. 25(85), pages 6-29, November.
    8. Ardalan, Kavous, 2017. "Driving force of globalization: A multi- paradigmatic look," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 480-492.
    9. Lukáš Tichý, 2019. "The diversification discourse of Russia and its energy relations with the EU," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 179-193, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:intstu:v:48:y:2011:i:3-4:p:317-324. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.