IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/fortra/v48y2013i1p143-151.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Liberalizing FDI in Retail: Implications for India’s Trade Agreements

Author

Listed:
  • Arpita Mukherjee

    (Arpita Mukherjee is a Professor, ICRIER. E-mail: arpita@icrier.res.in)

  • Tanu M. Goyal

    (Tanu M. Goyal is a Research Associate, ICRIER. E-mail: tgoyal@icrier.res.in)

Abstract

India is a proponent of liberalizing services in the WTO and in its FTAs. However, the country has not taken commitments in sectors such as retail in its trade agreements. This is because there are restrictions on FDI in this sector. India’s trading partners have been requesting for liberal commitments in the retail sector. In the year 2012, India autonomously liberalized FDI in retail, allowing 100 per cent FDI in single-brand and 51 per cent in multi-brand retail subject to certain conditions. Given this background, this paper examines the impact of autonomous liberalization on India’s commitments in trade agreements. The paper found that if India agrees to bind the autonomous regime in the trade agreements, it will increase India’s bargaining power in the WTO and FTAs. The country can trade-off commitments in retail sector for greater market access in areas of its trade interest. Binding the autonomous regime in trade agreements will speed up the negotiations process and lead to conclusion of pending agreements such as the India-EU bilateral agreement. However, there are some concerns. Since the FDI liberalization is accompanied by certain restrictions, which are only applicable to foreign service providers, India cannot undertake national treatment commitments.

Suggested Citation

  • Arpita Mukherjee & Tanu M. Goyal, 2013. "Liberalizing FDI in Retail: Implications for India’s Trade Agreements," Foreign Trade Review, , vol. 48(1), pages 143-151, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:fortra:v:48:y:2013:i:1:p:143-151
    DOI: 10.1177/001573251204800108
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/001573251204800108
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/001573251204800108?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carsten Fink & Martín Molinuevo, 2008. "East Asian Free Trade Agreements in Services: Key Architectural Elements," Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 11(2), pages 263-311, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Berisha-Krasniqi, Valdete & Bouet, Antoine & Estrades, Carmen & Laborde, David, 2011. "Trade and investment in Latin America and Asia: Lessons from the past and potential perspectives from further integration," IFPRI discussion papers 1060, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    2. Ann Capling, 2011. "A comparison of the ASEAN-Australia-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement and P4 Agreement," STUDIES IN TRADE AND INVESTMENT, in: Trade-led growth: A sound strategy for Asia, chapter 6, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP).
    3. Arpita Mukherjee & Tanu M. Goyal, 2013. "FDI in Services and India," Foreign Trade Review, , vol. 48(3), pages 413-430, August.
    4. Masahiro Kawai & Ganeshan Wignaraja, 2014. "Policy challenges posed by Asian free trade agreements: a review of the evidence," Chapters, in: Richard Baldwin & Masahiro Kawai & Ganeshan Wignaraja (ed.), A World Trade Organization for the 21st Century, chapter 8, pages 182-238, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. Henry Gao, 2011. "Trans-Pacific strategic economic partnership agreement: High standard or missed opportunity?," STUDIES IN TRADE AND INVESTMENT, in: Trade-led growth: A sound strategy for Asia, chapter 5, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP).
    6. Shepherd, Ben & Pasadilla, Gloria, 2012. "Services as a New Engine of Growth for ASEAN, the People’s Republic of China, and India," ADBI Working Papers 349, Asian Development Bank Institute.
    7. Ganeshan Wignaraja & Dorothea Ramizo & Luca Burmeister, 2012. "Asia-Latin America Free Trade Agreements : An Instrument for Inter-Regional Liberalization and Integration?," Governance Working Papers 23332, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    8. Kawai, Masahiro & Wignaraja, Ganeshan, 2014. "Trade Policy and Growth in Asia," ADBI Working Papers 495, Asian Development Bank Institute.
    9. Aaditya Mattoo & Arvind Subramanian, 2012. "China and the World Trading System," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(12), pages 1733-1771, December.
    10. Alexander Daniltsev & Olga Biryukova, 2015. "Beyond the GATS: Implicit Engines in Services RTAs," Panoeconomicus, Savez ekonomista Vojvodine, Novi Sad, Serbia, vol. 62(3), pages 321-337, June.
    11. Batshur Gootiiz & Aaditya Mattoo, 2017. "Regionalism in Services: A Study of ASEAN," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(3), pages 574-597, March.
    12. Mirajul Haq & Syed Kafait Hussain Naqvi & Muhammad Luqman, 2016. "Is the Value Addition in Services and Manufacturing Complementary? Empirical Evidence from SAARC," Lahore Journal of Economics, Department of Economics, The Lahore School of Economics, vol. 21(2), pages 31-52, July-Dec.
    13. Christopher Findlay, 2011. "Services Trade and Investment Liberalization," Chapters, in: Masahisa Fujita & Ikuo Kuroiwa & Satoru Kumagai (ed.), The Economics of East Asian Integration, chapter 8, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    14. Russel Kingshott & Piyush Sharma & Peter Hosie & Nebojsa Davcik, 2019. "Interactive impact of ethnic distance and cultural familiarity on the perceived effects of free trade agreements," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 135-160, March.
    15. Aaditya Mattoo & Arvind Subramanian, 2011. "A China Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations," Working Paper Series WP11-22, Peterson Institute for International Economics.
    16. Tanu M. Goyal, 2021. "Technology Uncertainty and Incompleteness in Trade Agreements: Reflections from the Design of India’s Bilateral Agreements Covering Services," Foreign Trade Review, , vol. 56(3), pages 322-340, August.
    17. Claes G. Alvstam & Erja Kettunen & Patrik Ström, 2017. "The service sector in the free-trade agreement between the EU and Singapore: closing the gap between policy and business realities," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 75-105, March.
    18. Masahiro Kawai & Ganeshan Wignaraja, 2014. "Evolving trade policy architecture and FTAs in Asia," Chapters, in: Masahiro Kawai & Peter J. Morgan & Pradumna B. Rana (ed.), New Global Economic Architecture, chapter 7, pages 148-171, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    19. Hold, Arno & Wunsch-Vincent, Sacha, 2011. "Towards Coherent Rules for Digital Trade: Building on Efforts in Multilateral versus Preferential Trade Negotiations," Papers 251, World Trade Institute.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:fortra:v:48:y:2013:i:1:p:143-151. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.