IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

The emerging accountability regimes for the Sustainable Development Goals and policy integration: Friend or foe?


  • Sylvia Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen
  • Arthur L Dahl
  • Ã…sa Persson


The 17 Sustainable Development Goals and the full Agenda 2030 in which they are embedded are aspirational and intended to be both transformational and integrative in a number of ways. The need for integration across policy domains is stressed throughout the agenda. The Sustainable Development Goals are also accompanied by an emerging system for follow-up and review centered on a long list of indicators that are intended to enable countries to be accountable towards their citizens. There is, however, in the accountability literature indication that some accountability mechanisms can be counterproductive for integrative policies. This paper is centered around the question whether an accountability regime, and if so how, is compatible with a high degree of policy integration both conceptually and in the context of the Sustainable Development Goals. We approach this question through looking both at the literature on integrative governance and some of the central concepts it covers such as (environmental) policy integration and mainstreaming, and the accountability literature. This enables us to provide an analytical framework for evaluating the potential of the emerging accountability regimes for the Sustainable Development Goals to enhance more integrated policy making and action. We conclude that there are little or no strong hierarchical elements of accountability relationships at the global level which can be good news for more integrative policies – but only if there is a strong sense of shared responsibility among actors at all levels, available information on the types of behavioural efforts that support integration, and accountholders that take an active interest in integration. At the national level, there may be hierarchical accountability mechanisms with sanction possibilities that may discourage integration. Here, those who hold actors to account can counteract this if they have deeper understanding of the underlying interlinkages among the goals and targets, and based on this, engage in accountability mechanisms.

Suggested Citation

  • Sylvia Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen & Arthur L Dahl & Ã…sa Persson, 2018. "The emerging accountability regimes for the Sustainable Development Goals and policy integration: Friend or foe?," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 36(8), pages 1371-1390, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:36:y:2018:i:8:p:1371-1390
    DOI: 10.1177/2399654418779995

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL:
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. David Hulme, 2009. "The Millennium Development Goals (MDGs): A Short History of the World’s Biggest Promise," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series 10009, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    2. Åsa Persson, 2009. "Environmental policy integration and bilateral development assistance: challenges and opportunities with an evolving governance framework," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 9(4), pages 409-429, November.
    3. Ingrid J. Visseren-Hamakers & Bas Arts & Pieter Glasbergen, 2011. "Interaction Management by Partnerships: The Case of Biodiversity and Climate Change," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 11(4), pages 89-107, November.
    4. Thomas Schillemans, 2008. "Accountability in the Shadow of Hierarchy: The Horizontal Accountability of Agencies," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 175-194, June.
    5. Mark Philp, 2009. "Delimiting Democratic Accountability," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 57, pages 28-53, March.
    6. Fiona Nunan & Adrian Campbell & Emma Foster, 2012. "Environmental Mainstreaming: The Organisational Challenges Of Policy Integration," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 32(3), pages 262-277, August.
    7. Ochieng, Robert M. & Visseren-Hamakers, Ingrid J. & Nketiah, Kwabena S., 2013. "Interaction between the FLEGT-VPA and REDD+ in Ghana: Recommendations for interaction management," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 32-39.
    8. Linn Persson & Åsa Persson & Chanthy Sam, 2016. "Implementation of the Strategic Approach to International Chemicals Management in Cambodia: effects of regime design," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 1-20, February.
    9. Mark Philp, 2009. "Delimiting Democratic Accountability," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 57(1), pages 28-53, March.
    10. Jose Antonio Ocampo, 2015. "A Post-2015 Monitoring and Accountability Framework," CDP Background Papers 027, United Nations, Department of Economics and Social Affairs.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dávid-Barrett, Elizabeth & Fazekas, Mihály, 2020. "Anti-corruption in aid-funded procurement: Is corruption reduced or merely displaced?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    2. Raphael Zumofen, 2016. "Public accountability: a summary analysis [Accountability publique - Une analyse synthétique]," Post-Print hal-03623871, HAL.
    3. Nasir Iqbal & Ghulam Mustafa, 2022. "A Review of Accountability Systems: Learning from Best Practices," PIDE Knowledge Brief 2022:82, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics.
    4. Kaisa Herne & Olli Lappalainen & Maija Setälä & Juha Ylisalo, 2022. "Accountability as a Warrant for Trust: An Experiment on Sanctions and Justifications in a Trust Game," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 93(4), pages 615-648, November.
    5. Olufunso A Somorin & Ingrid J Visseren-Hamakers & Bas Arts & Anne-Marie Tiani & Denis J Sonwa, 2016. "Integration through interaction? Synergy between adaptation and mitigation (REDD+) in Cameroon," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 34(3), pages 415-432, May.
    6. Samson Tiki & Belinda Luke & Janet Mack, 2021. "Perceptions of bribery in Papua New Guinea’s public sector: Agency and structural influences," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 41(4), pages 217-227, October.
    7. Hisham Abdul Kareem Shaheen & Lama Ismail Mohammad Ahmad & Amer Saadi Kallel Shakkour & Reem Khaled Matahen & Salwa Abdul Fattah Talab Al Azzeh, 2020. "Human Resources Management Effectiveness and the Role of Quality Management: Empirical Study in Jordanian Pharmaceutical Companies," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(4), pages 44-59.
    8. Rosalyn Perkins & Mary Caroline Castaño & Condrad Montemayor, 2018. "Analysis of predictability and accountability transparency practices and FTA on trade growth in selected countries of the Asia-Pacific region: a descriptive-causal approach," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 7(1), pages 1-18, December.
    9. Nathan, Iben & Chen, Jie & Hansen, Christian Pilegaard & Xu, Bin & Li, Yan, 2018. "Facing the complexities of the global timber trade regime: How do Chinese wood enterprises respond to international legality verification requirements, and what are the implications for regime effecti," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 169-180.
    10. Tom Christensen & Per Lægreid, 2015. "Performance and Accountability—A Theoretical Discussion and an Empirical Assessment," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 207-225, June.
    11. Rohini Ruhil, 2015. "Millennium Development Goals to Sustainable Development Goals," International Studies, , vol. 52(1-4), pages 118-135, January.
    12. Rory Horner & David Hulme, 2019. "From International to Global Development: New Geographies of 21st Century Development," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 50(2), pages 347-378, March.
    13. Chris Skelcher & Jacob Torfing, 2010. "Improving democratic governance through institutional design: Civic participation and democratic ownership in Europe," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 4(1), pages 71-91, March.
    14. Pistorius, Till & Reinecke, Sabine, 2013. "The interim REDD+ Partnership: Boost for biodiversity safeguards?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 80-86.
    15. Marija Aleksovska & Thomas Schillemans & Stephan Grimmelikhuijsen, 2019. "Lessons from five decades of experimental and behavioral research on accountability: A systematic literature review," Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, Center for Experimental and Behavioral Public Administration, vol. 2(2).
    16. Anita Breuer & Julia Leininger, 2021. "Horizontal Accountability for SDG Implementation: A Comparative Cross-National Analysis of Emerging National Accountability Regimes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-23, June.
    17. Giovanni Pilato & Susannah M. Sallu & Marta Gaworek-Michalczenia, 2018. "Assessing the Integration of Climate Change and Development Strategies at Local Levels: Insights from Muheza District, Tanzania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-25, January.
    18. Tuba I. Agartan, 2021. "Politics of success stories in the path towards Universal Health Coverage: The case of Turkey," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 39(2), pages 283-302, March.
    19. MacFeely Steve, 2020. "Measuring the Sustainable Development Goal Indicators: An Unprecedented Statistical Challenge," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 36(2), pages 361-378, June.
    20. Gakou-Kakeu, Josiane & Di Gregorio, Monica & Paavola, Jouni & Sonwa, Denis Jean, 2022. "REDD+ policy implementation and institutional interplay: Evidence from three pilot projects in Cameroon," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:36:y:2018:i:8:p:1371-1390. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.