IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v53y2026i1p163-179.html

Detecting cross-boundary regional collaboration in China by network community scanning with human mobility data

Author

Listed:
  • Lingbo Liu
  • Fahui Wang

Abstract

Accurately identifying and analyzing cross-boundary regional cooperation remains challenging due to administrative constraints and data limitations. This study utilizes high-resolution human mobility data, network community scanning (NCS), and association rule mining to examine trans-provincial cooperation across 369 Chinese cities, leveraging Location-Based Services (LBS) data from 1.3 billion users. The findings indicate that border-adjacent cooperation dominates trans-provincial interactions in China, while non-adjacent cooperation is embedded within broader cooperative networks formed through adjacent ties reinforcing the interwoven nature of cross-administrative collaborations. Additionally, emerging cooperative clusters extend beyond officially designated urban agglomerations, revealing unrecognized regional synergies not yet captured in planning frameworks. These results highlight discrepancies between actual collaboration linkages and government-defined regional plans, underscoring the need for adaptive, data-driven policymaking and offering practical insights for regional planning and governance.

Suggested Citation

  • Lingbo Liu & Fahui Wang, 2026. "Detecting cross-boundary regional collaboration in China by network community scanning with human mobility data," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 53(1), pages 163-179, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:53:y:2026:i:1:p:163-179
    DOI: 10.1177/23998083251339482
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23998083251339482
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23998083251339482?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Johannes Glückler, 2007. "Economic geography and the evolution of networks," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 7(5), pages 619-634, September.
    2. Andres Gomez-Lievano & Oscar Patterson-Lomba & Ricardo Hausmann, 2017. "Explaining the prevalence, scaling and variance of urban phenomena," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 1(1), pages 1-6, January.
    3. Johannes Gluckler, 2007. "Economic Geography and the Evolution of Networks," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 0704, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Apr 2007.
    4. John Harrison & Daniel Galland & Mark Tewdwr-Jones, 2021. "Whither regional planning?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(1), pages 1-5, January.
    5. Cheng, Lu & Mi, Zhifu & Sudmant, Andrew & Coffman, D'Maris, 2022. "Bigger cities better climate? Results from an analysis of urban areas in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    6. Michael Batty, 2017. "Urban studies: Diverse cities, successful cities," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 1(1), pages 1-2, January.
    7. Tabuchi, Takatoshi, 1998. "Urban Agglomeration and Dispersion: A Synthesis of Alonso and Krugman," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 333-351, November.
    8. Stephen Graham & Simon Marvin, 2022. "Splintering Urbanism at 20 and the “Infrastructural Turn”," Journal of Urban Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(1), pages 169-175, January.
    9. Eva Purkarthofer & Alois Humer & Raine Mäntysalo, 2021. "Regional planning: an arena of interests, institutions and relations," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(5), pages 773-777, May.
    10. Jean-Paul D. Addie & Michael R. Glass & Jen Nelles, 2020. "Regionalizing the infrastructure turn: a research agenda," Regional Studies, Regional Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 10-26, January.
    11. Michael Neuman & Angela Hull, 2009. "The Futures of the City Region," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(6), pages 777-787.
    12. Stephanie Wakefield, 2022. "Critical urban theory in the Anthropocene," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(5), pages 917-936, April.
    13. John Harrison & Hao Gu, 2021. "Planning megaregional futures: spatial imaginaries and megaregion formation in China," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(1), pages 77-89, January.
    14. Li, Lei & Ma, Shaojun & Zheng, Yilin & Xiao, Xinyue, 2022. "Integrated regional development: Comparison of urban agglomeration policies in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    15. Eva Purkarthofer & Franziska Sielker & Dominic Stead, 2022. "Soft planning in macro-regions and megaregions: creating toothless spatial imaginaries or new forces for change?," International Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(2), pages 120-138, April.
    16. Chen, Jian & Zhao, Di & He, Bin & Stanojevic, Savo, 2022. "How do fiscally created one-city monopolies cause intra-provincial inequality in China?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    17. John Harrison & Daniel Galland & Mark Tewdwr-Jones, 2021. "Regional planning is dead: long live planning regional futures," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(1), pages 6-18, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael R Glass & Jean-Paul D Addie, 2025. "Bridging ‘infrastructural solutions’ and ‘infrastructures as solution’: Regional promises and urban pragmatism," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 62(9), pages 1771-1792, July.
    2. Papamichail, Theodora & Perić, Ana, 2023. "Action-oriented planning methods as a tool for improving regional governance in Switzerland: Evidence from the Sisslerfeld area," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    3. Sarah Williams & Elizabeth Currid-Halkett, 2014. "Industry in Motion: Using Smart Phones to Explore the Spatial Network of the Garment Industry in New York City," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(2), pages 1-11, February.
    4. Melissa Haller & David L. Rigby, 2020. "The geographic evolution of optics technologies in the United States, 1976–2010," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 99(6), pages 1539-1559, December.
    5. Jiang He & M. Hosein Fallah, 2014. "Dynamics of Inventor Networks and the Evolution of Technology Clusters," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(6), pages 2174-2200, November.
    6. Hossam Hewidy & Susa Eräranta, 2025. "Bridging the gap: Exploring urban resilience and sustainability in Finnish regional development," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(1), pages 794-810, February.
    7. Max-Peter Menzel, 2008. "Dynamic Proximities – Changing Relations by Creating and Bridging Distances," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 0816, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Oct 2008.
    8. Moira V. Faul, 2016. "Networks and Power: Why Networks are Hierarchical Not Flat and What Can Be Done About It," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 7(2), pages 185-197, May.
    9. Lorenzo Cassi & Anne Plunket, 2015. "Research Collaboration in Co-inventor Networks: Combining Closure, Bridging and Proximities," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(6), pages 936-954, June.
    10. Tom Broekel, 2015. "The Co-evolution of Proximities - A Network Level Study," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(6), pages 921-935, June.
    11. Ilwon Seo, 2019. "Regions’ Technology Brokerage Patterns and Dynamics for Regional Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-15, May.
    12. Stefan Rehak, 2011. "Lack of knowledge networking? The role of discontinuity in the post socialist countries," ERSA conference papers ersa10p892, European Regional Science Association.
    13. Matteo Spinazzola & Veronica Scuotto & Marco Pironti & Manlio Giudice, 2025. "Connectedness of entrepreneurial ecosystems: evidence from the mobility of knowledge-intensive entrepreneurs," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 65(3), pages 1517-1534, October.
    14. Thomas Scherngell & Katharina Schwegmann & Georg Zahradnik, 2023. "The geographical dynamics of global R&D collaboration networks in robotics: Evidence from co-patenting activities across urban areas worldwide," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(4), pages 1-21, April.
    15. Lorenzo Cassi & Anne Plunket, 2010. "The determinants of co-inventor tie formation: proximity and network dynamics," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1015, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Nov 2010.
    16. Ron Boschma & Pierre-Alexandre Balland & Dieter Kogler, 2011. "A relational approach to knowledge spillovers in biotech. Network structures as drivers of inter-organizational citation patterns," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1120, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Dec 2011.
    17. Tom Broekel & Ron Boschma, 2011. "The cognitive and geographical composition of ego-networks of firms – and how they impact on their innovation performance," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1118, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Aug 2011.
    18. Ron Boschma & Koen Frenken, 2015. "Evolutionary Economic Geography," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1518, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised May 2015.
    19. Tasnuva Mahjabin & Susana Garcia & Caitlin Grady & Alfonso Mejia, 2018. "Large cities get more for less: Water footprint efficiency across the US," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-17, August.
    20. Andrew Watkins, 2010. "The Venture Capital Perspective on Collaboration with Large Corporations/MNEs in London and the South East: Pursuing Extra‐Regional Knowledge and the Shaping of Regional Venture Capital Networks?," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 27(4), pages 491-507, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:53:y:2026:i:1:p:163-179. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.