IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v52y2025i9p2153-2170.html

Different perspectives are indispensable for public space quality: Exploring the relationship between urban design quality and physical disorder

Author

Listed:
  • Yue Ma
  • Tangqi Tu
  • Ying Long

Abstract

Public space quality is a multidimensional concept. Urban design quality and physical disorder represent it from the perspectives of design and maintenance, respectively. However, the practical relationship between these two factors remains unclear, raising questions about the necessity of measuring multiple dimensions of public space quality simultaneously. Based on classical studies and theories, this study developed index systems for both factors. Utilizing artificial virtual auditing and deep learning models, including FCN and SegNet, the street visual quality of two Chinese cities was assessed from the perspectives of urban design and physical disorder using extensive street view images. The correlation between these two factors was explored. The results showed that the Spearman correlation coefficients for urban design quality and physical disorder were 0.308 and −0.085 in the two cities, respectively, indicating weak or unclear correlations. Additionally, the fit and explanatory power of the linear and nonlinear regression models constructed were poor, further demonstrating that it is difficult to predict and explain one variable using the other. In the robustness test, the results were further validated by including control variables related to urban vitality, cultural characteristics, and urban development, considering the impact of the distribution of the street view images, drilling down to more granular dimensions and extending the scope of the study to a wider area. The levels of design and maintenance of streets cannot be conflated or substituted, and neither can independently represent the overall space quality alone. Both are indispensable, making it crucial to separately assess and address space quality issues from different perspectives. These results broaden our understanding of high-visual-quality street space and provide references for urban planners and stakeholders in improving street space quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Yue Ma & Tangqi Tu & Ying Long, 2025. "Different perspectives are indispensable for public space quality: Exploring the relationship between urban design quality and physical disorder," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 52(9), pages 2153-2170, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:52:y:2025:i:9:p:2153-2170
    DOI: 10.1177/23998083251326772
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23998083251326772
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23998083251326772?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shima Hamidi & Somayeh Moazzeni, 2019. "Examining the Relationship between Urban Design Qualities and Walking Behavior: Empirical Evidence from Dallas, TX," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-14, May.
    2. repec:plo:pone00:0171110 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Fan Zhang & Arianna Salazar-Miranda & Fábio Duarte & Lawrence Vale & Gary Hack & Min Chen & Yu Liu & Michael Batty & Carlo Ratti, 2024. "Urban Visual Intelligence: Studying Cities with Artificial Intelligence and Street-Level Imagery," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 114(5), pages 876-897, May.
    4. Ding, Chuan & Cao, Xinyu & Liu, Chao, 2019. "How does the station-area built environment influence Metrorail ridership? Using gradient boosting decision trees to identify non-linear thresholds," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 70-78.
    5. Jingjia Chen & Long Chen & Yan Li & Wenjia Zhang & Ying Long, 2023. "Measuring Physical Disorder in Urban Street Spaces: A Large-Scale Analysis Using Street View Images and Deep Learning," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 113(2), pages 469-487, February.
    6. Enshan Hooi & Dorina Pojani, 2020. "Urban design quality and walkability: an audit of suburban high streets in an Australian city," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 155-179, January.
    7. James W. Quinn & Stephen J. Mooney & Daniel M. Sheehan & Julien O. Teitler & Kathryn M. Neckerman & Tanya K. Kaufman & Gina S. Lovasi & Michael D. M. Bader & Andrew G. Rundle, 2016. "Neighborhood physical disorder in New York City," Journal of Maps, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 53-60, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Yi & Miao, Jia, 2025. "From disorder to distress: Investigating neighborhood change and mental health with Streetview and longitudinal survey data," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 384(C).
    2. Zhehao Zhang & Thomas Fisher & Haiming Wang, 2023. "Walk Score, Environmental Quality and Walking in a Campus Setting," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-19, March.
    3. Singleton, Patrick A. & Park, Keunhyun & Lee, Doo Hong, 2021. "Varying influences of the built environment on daily and hourly pedestrian crossing volumes at signalized intersections estimated from traffic signal controller event data," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    4. Regine Gerike & Caroline Koszowski & Bettina Schröter & Ralph Buehler & Paul Schepers & Johannes Weber & Rico Wittwer & Peter Jones, 2021. "Built Environment Determinants of Pedestrian Activities and Their Consideration in Urban Street Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-21, August.
    5. Neal J. Wilson & Douglas Bowles, 2024. "A Parcel Level Housing Conditions Survey in Academic and Civil Context," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(2), pages 21582440241, June.
    6. Li, Mengya & Kwan, Mei-Po & Hu, Wenyan & Li, Rui & Wang, Jun, 2023. "Examining the effects of station-level factors on metro ridership using multiscale geographically weighted regression," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    7. Cui, Mengying & Yu, Lijie & Nie, Shaoyu & Dai, Zhe & Ge, Ying-en & Levinson, David, 2025. "How do access and spatial dependency shape metro passenger flows," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    8. Jun Cao & Tanhua Jin & Tao Shou & Long Cheng & Zhicheng Liu & Frank Witlox, 2023. "Investigating the Nonlinear Relationship Between Car Dependency and the Built Environment," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(3), pages 41-55.
    9. Xuesong Feng & Zhibin Tao & Xuejun Niu & Zejing Ruan, 2021. "Multi-Objective Land Use Allocation Optimization in View of Overlapped Influences of Rail Transit Stations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-14, November.
    10. Shao, Qifan & Zhang, Wenjia & Cao, Xinyu (Jason) & Yang, Jiawen, 2023. "Built environment interventions for emission mitigation: A machine learning analysis of travel-related CO2 in a developing city," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    11. He, Xuan & He, Sylvia Y., 2025. "How does the effect of walkability on walking behavior vary with the time of day? A study of Shenzhen, China," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    12. Sun, Shan & Guo, Liang & Yang, Shuo & Cao, Jason, 2024. "Exploring the contributions of Ebike ownership, transit access, and the built environment to car ownership in a developing city," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    13. Laviolette, Jérôme & Morency, Catherine & Waygood, E.O.D., 2022. "A kilometer or a mile? Does buffer size matter when it comes to car ownership?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    14. Mona Jabbari & Zahra Ahmadi & Rui Ramos, 2022. "Defining a Digital System for the Pedestrian Network as a Conceptual Implementation Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-11, February.
    15. Adrian Buttazzoni & Leia Minaker, 2023. "Associations between adolescent mental health and pedestrian- and transit-oriented urban design qualities: Evidence from a national-level online Canadian survey," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(10), pages 1968-1986, August.
    16. Su, Shiliang & Wang, Zhuolun & Li, Bozhao & Kang, Mengjun, 2022. "Deciphering the influence of TOD on metro ridership: An integrated approach of extended node-place model and interpretable machine learning with planning implications," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    17. Yin, Chun & Cao, Jason & Sun, Bindong & Liu, Jiahang, 2023. "Exploring built environment correlates of walking for different purposes: Evidence for substitution," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    18. Wang, Jing & Wan, Feng & Dong, Chunjiao & Yin, Chaoying & Chen, Xiaoyu, 2023. "Spatiotemporal effects of built environment factors on varying rail transit station ridership patterns," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    19. Tao, Sui & Cheng, Long & He, Sylvia & Witlox, Frank, 2023. "Examining the non-linear effects of transit accessibility on daily trip duration: A focus on the low-income population," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    20. Li, Zekun & Chen, Zhenhua, 2023. "Predicting the future development scale of high-speed rail through the urban scaling law," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:52:y:2025:i:9:p:2153-2170. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.