IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v53y2021i1p113-130.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social impact bonds and fast policy: Analyzing the Australian experience

Author

Listed:
  • Jacob Broom

Abstract

Social impact bonds (SIBs) are attracting an increasing amount of critical scholarly attention. As an outcomes-based mechanism for financing social services, SIBs financialize social policy through the logic of impact investing. Responding to calls for attention to the politics of SIBs’ development, and breaking with the literature’s focus on cases from the UK and USA, this article explores the emergence of SIBs in Australia. It employs the concept of “fast policy,†which theorizes why and how policies move across borders, and describes the contemporary conditions that enable them to do so. Using document analysis, the article explores the discursive devices and practices used to justify the “pulling in†of SIBs to states in Australia. It finds that key actors in the Australian social impact world justified SIBs’ adoption using their synergy with powerful, popular policy discourses and practices, rather than engaging in political debates about their desirability. The Australian experience illuminates the power of intermediaries and the investors they represent over the design and proliferation of SIBs, as well as the roles played by austerity politics, policy experimentalism, and fast policy infrastructures in producing a context in which SIBs could be made real.

Suggested Citation

  • Jacob Broom, 2021. "Social impact bonds and fast policy: Analyzing the Australian experience," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(1), pages 113-130, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:53:y:2021:i:1:p:113-130
    DOI: 10.1177/0308518X20941522
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0308518X20941522
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0308518X20941522?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jamie Peck & Nik Theodore, 2012. "Follow the Policy: A Distended Case Approach," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(1), pages 21-30, January.
    2. Cooper, Christine & Graham, Cameron & Himick, Darlene, 2016. "Social impact bonds: The securitization of the homeless," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 63-82.
    3. David Harvie & Robert Ogman, 2019. "The broken promises of the social investment market," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 51(4), pages 980-1004, June.
    4. Mildred E. Warner, 2013. "Private finance for public goods: social impact bonds," Journal of Economic Policy Reform, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 16(4), pages 303-319, December.
    5. Chris Pierson & Francis G. Castles, 2002. "Australian Antecedents of the Third Way," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 50(4), pages 683-702, September.
    6. Christian Berndt & Manuel Wirth, 2019. "Struggling for the Moral Market: Economic Knowledge, Diverse Markets, and Market Borders," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 95(3), pages 288-309, May.
    7. Paul Langley, 2020. "The folds of social finance: Making markets, remaking the social," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(1), pages 130-147, February.
    8. Mildred E. Warner, 2013. "Private finance for public goods: social impact bonds," Journal of Economic Policy Reform, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(4), pages 303-319, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kosmynin, Mikhail & Jack, Sarah L., 2022. "Alternative investing as brokering: The embedding process of a Social Impact Bond model in a local context," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 17(C).
    2. Manuel Wirth, 2021. "Mobilizing affect, shaping market subjects: Tracing the connections of neuroliberalism and social finance in youth homelessness projects," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(6), pages 1356-1372, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Manuel Wirth, 2021. "Mobilizing affect, shaping market subjects: Tracing the connections of neuroliberalism and social finance in youth homelessness projects," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(6), pages 1356-1372, September.
    2. Eleonora Broccardo & Maria Mazzuca & Maria Laura Frigotto, 2020. "Social impact bonds: The evolution of research and a review of the academic literature," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3), pages 1316-1332, May.
    3. Harvie, David & Lightfoot, Geoff & Lilley, Simon & Weir, Kenneth, 2021. "Social investment innovation and the ‘social turn’ of neoliberal finance," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    4. Rosella Carè & Stella Carè & Nathalie Lévy & Rabia Fatima, 2023. "Missing finance in social impact bond research? A bibliometric overview between past and future research," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(5), pages 2101-2120, September.
    5. David Harvie & Robert Ogman, 2019. "The broken promises of the social investment market," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 51(4), pages 980-1004, June.
    6. Rosella Carè & Riccardo De Lisa, 2019. "Social Impact Bonds for a Sustainable Welfare State: The Role of Enabling Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-23, May.
    7. Mazzuca, Maria & Panzera, Elena & Ruberto, Sabrina, 2023. "The investor's participation in social impact bonds," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 349-363.
    8. Mariano Méndez-Suárez & Abel Monfort & Fernando Gallardo, 2020. "Sustainable Banking: New Forms of Investing under the Umbrella of the 2030 Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-13, March.
    9. Alessandro Rizzello & Abdellah Kabli, 2020. "Sustainable Financial Partnerships for the SDGs: The Case of Social Impact Bonds," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-22, July.
    10. Paweł Mikołajczak, 2023. "Comparative study of social impact bonds – capital per beneficiary and scheme duration," Bank i Kredyt, Narodowy Bank Polski, vol. 54(2), pages 191-220.
    11. Mario La Torre & Annarita Trotta & Helen Chiappini & Alessandro Rizzello, 2019. "Business Models for Sustainable Finance: The Case Study of Social Impact Bonds," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-23, March.
    12. Leonardo Becchetti & Fabio Pisani & Francesco Salustri & Lorenzo Semplici, 2022. "The frontier of social impact finance in the public sector: Theory and two case studies," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 93(4), pages 887-912, December.
    13. Rosella Carè & Francesco Rania & Riccardo De Lisa, 2020. "Critical Success Factors, Motivations, and Risks in Social Impact Bonds," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-17, September.
    14. Walker, Thomas & Goubran, Sherif & Karami, Moein & Dumont-Bergeron, Adele & Schwartz, Tyler & Vico, Kalima, 2023. "Mainstreaming social impact bonds: A critical analysis," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    15. Julie RIJPENS & Marie J. BOUCHARD & Emilien GRUET & Gabriel SALATHÉ-BEAULIEU, 2020. "Social Impact Bonds: Promises versus facts. What does the recent scientific literature tell us?," CIRIEC Working Papers 2015, CIRIEC - Université de Liège.
    16. Hanna Kociemska & Boguslaw Poltorak, 2021. "The Influence of Social Impact Bonds on Public–Private Partnership Success: The Case of Higher Education," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 423-438.
    17. Elisa Baraibar-Diez & Manuel Luna & María D. Odriozola & Ignacio Llorente, 2020. "Mapping Social Impact: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-20, November.
    18. Diana Pop & Caroline Marie-Jeanne & Régis Dumoulin, 2023. "Socialium or the Financial Price of Social Responsibility [« Socialium » ou le prix financier de la responsabilité sociale]," Post-Print hal-04120305, HAL.
    19. Anna Höchstädter & Barbara Scheck, 2015. "What’s in a Name: An Analysis of Impact Investing Understandings by Academics and Practitioners," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 132(2), pages 449-475, December.
    20. Siobhan McGrath & Fabiola Mieres, 2022. "The Business of Abolition: Marketizing ‘Anti‐slavery’," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 53(1), pages 3-30, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:53:y:2021:i:1:p:113-130. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.