IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v44y2012i5p1148-1164.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Voluntary Sector Organisations Working at the Neighbourhood Level in England: Patterns by Local Area Deprivation

Author

Listed:
  • David Clifford

    (Third Sector Research Centre, Faculty of Social and Human Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, England)

Abstract

Geographical variations in voluntary sector activity are important where they lead to inequity in service provision and differences in the opportunity to participate in voluntary group activities. However, despite important theoretical work, very little work has demonstrated variation empirically, particularly variation at the local (neighbourhood) level. This paper, for the first time, examines nationally representative data to illustrate the very real geographical differences across England in the prevalence of voluntary organisations working at a neighbourhood scale. Overall, less deprived local areas have a much higher prevalence than more deprived local areas. While certain kinds of organisations are more prevalent in more deprived areas, including those working in the field of economic well-being, this reflects the presence of organisations which receive public funds. These patterns are consistent with a key element of ‘voluntary sector failure’, resource insufficiency, and the important role of government in ensuring resources are available in areas of particular need.

Suggested Citation

  • David Clifford, 2012. "Voluntary Sector Organisations Working at the Neighbourhood Level in England: Patterns by Local Area Deprivation," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(5), pages 1148-1164, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:44:y:2012:i:5:p:1148-1164
    DOI: 10.1068/a44446
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a44446
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a44446?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David North & Stephen Syrett, 2008. "Making the Links: Economic Deprivation, Neighbourhood Renewal and Scales of Governance," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(1), pages 133-148.
    2. Colin Williams, 2003. "Developing Community Involvement: Contrasting Local and Regional Participatory Cultures in Britain and their Implications for Policy," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(5), pages 531-541.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bardsley, Nicholas & Büchs, Milena & James, Patrick & Papafragkou, Anastasios & Rushby, Thomas & Saunders, Clare & Smith, Graham & Wallbridge, Rebecca & Woodman, Nicholas, 2019. "Domestic thermal upgrades, community action and energy saving: A three-year experimental study of prosperous households," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 475-485.
    2. Amanda Fitzgerald & Ruth Lupton, 2015. "The Coalition's Record on Area Regeneration and Neighbourhood Renewal: Policy, Spending and Outcomes 2010-2015," CASE - Social Policy in a Cold Climate Working Paper 19, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Uwe Neumann & Helmut Geißler & Peter Jakubowski, 2013. "Agglomeration economies in the neighbourhood? Evidence from German cities," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 28(1), pages 51-65, February.
    2. Uwe Neumann, 2015. "Ageing by feet? Regional migration, neighbourhood choice and local demographic change in German cities," ERSA conference papers ersa15p518, European Regional Science Association.
    3. John Mohan, 2012. "Geographical Foundations of the Big Society," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(5), pages 1121-1127, May.
    4. Robert Lee & Heinz Tüselmann & Dilani Jayawarna & Julia Rouse, 2011. "Investigating the Social Capital and Resource Acquisition of Entrepreneurs Residing in Deprived Areas of England," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 29(6), pages 1054-1072, December.
    5. Hazel Easthope & Wendy Stone & Lynda Cheshire, 2018. "The decline of ‘advantageous disadvantage’ in gateway suburbs in Australia: The challenge of private housing market settlement for newly arrived migrants," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(9), pages 1904-1923, July.
    6. Duncan Adam & Gaby Atfield & Anne E Green, 2017. "What works? Policies for employability in cities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(5), pages 1162-1177, April.
    7. Rhys Andrews & George A. Boyne, 2009. "Size, Structure and Administrative Overheads: An Empirical Analysis of English Local Authorities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(4), pages 739-759, April.
    8. Fangyun Xie & Guiwen Liu & Taozhi Zhuang, 2021. "A Comprehensive Review of Urban Regeneration Governance for Developing Appropriate Governance Arrangements," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-28, May.
    9. Paul Lawless & Michael Foden & Ian Wilson & Christina Beatty, 2010. "Understanding Area-based Regeneration: The New Deal for Communities Programme in England," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 47(2), pages 257-275, February.
    10. Stephen Syrett & David North, 2010. "Between Economic Competitiveness and Social Inclusion: New Labour and the Economic Revival of Deprived Neighbourhoods," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 25(5-6), pages 476-493, August.
    11. Irene Hardill, 2003. "Growing Old in England: Economic and Social Issues," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 18(4), pages 337-346, November.
    12. Frances Bowen & Aloysius Newenham-Kahindi & Irene Herremans, 2010. "When Suits Meet Roots: The Antecedents and Consequences of Community Engagement Strategy," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 95(2), pages 297-318, August.
    13. Rhys Andrews, 2007. "Civic Culture and Public Service Failure: An Empirical Exploration," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 44(4), pages 845-863, April.
    14. Liz Richardson & Kingsley Purdam & Sarah Cotterill & James Rees & Graham Squires & Rebecca Askew, 2014. "Responsible Citizens and Accountable Service Providers? Renegotiating the Contract between Citizen and State," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(7), pages 1716-1731, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:44:y:2012:i:5:p:1148-1164. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.