IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v29y1997i2p333-347.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Population Georeferencing in England and Wales: Basic Spatial Units Reconsidered

Author

Listed:
  • D Martin

    (Department of Geography, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, England)

  • G Higgs

    (Department of City and Regional Planning, University of Wales College of Cardiff, PO Box 906, Cardiff CF1 3YN, Wales)

Abstract

In this paper the concern is with the increasing number of methods which are available for the georeferencing of population and socioeconomic data. The majority of routine users of such data will tend to treat georeferencing of a transparent process, and will not question the impacts which georeferencing methods may have on substantive applications. In this paper four levels of geographical resolution in England and Wales are considered, between the most detailed census geography and individual property locations, and the potential for the creation of hybrid georeferences by the combination of existing data products is explored. With examples from a study area in Cardiff, South Wales, the interrelationship of the major data products is explored, with reference to basic household counts and incidence data. On the basis of these experiments, the use of hybrid georeferencing systems is reconsidered, highlighting potential applications as well as problems of data standards, confidentiality, and comparability.

Suggested Citation

  • D Martin & G Higgs, 1997. "Population Georeferencing in England and Wales: Basic Spatial Units Reconsidered," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 29(2), pages 333-347, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:29:y:1997:i:2:p:333-347
    DOI: 10.1068/a290333
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a290333
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a290333?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M F Goodchild & L Anselin & U Deichmann, 1993. "A Framework for the Areal Interpolation of Socioeconomic Data," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 25(3), pages 383-397, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Samantha Cockings & Andrew Harfoot & David Martin & Duncan Hornby, 2013. "Getting the Foundations Right: Spatial Building Blocks for Official Population Statistics," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 45(6), pages 1403-1420, June.
    2. Paul A Longley & Victor Mesev, 2000. "On the Measurement and Generalisation of Urban Form," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 32(3), pages 473-488, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Norton, Daniel & Hynes, Stephen, 2015. "Spatial issues arising from a value transfer exercise for environmental quality of marine waters," 150th Seminar, October 22-23, 2015, Edinburgh, Scotland 212663, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. Jin-Feng Wang & Robert Haining & Tie-Jun Liu & Lian-Fa Li & Cheng-Sheng Jiang, 2013. "Sandwich Estimation for Multi-Unit Reporting on a Stratified Heterogeneous Surface," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 45(10), pages 2515-2534, October.
    3. Federico Benassi & Francesca Bitonti & Angelo Mazza & Salvatore Strozza, 2023. "Sri Lankans’ residential segregation and spatial inequalities in Southern Italy: an empirical analysis using fine-scale data on regular lattice geographies," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(2), pages 1629-1648, April.
    4. Mattia Amadio & Jaroslav Mysiak & Sepehr Marzi, 2019. "Mapping Socioeconomic Exposure for Flood Risk Assessment in Italy," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(4), pages 829-845, April.
    5. Paolo Postiglione & Alfredo Cartone & Domenica Panzera, 2020. "Economic Convergence in EU NUTS 3 Regions: A Spatial Econometric Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-17, August.
    6. Nan Xu & Jiancheng Luo & Jin Zuo & Xiaodong Hu & Jing Dong & Tianjun Wu & Songliang Wu & Hao Liu, 2020. "Accurate Suitability Evaluation of Large-Scale Roof Greening Based on RS and GIS Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-23, May.
    7. Jing Yao & Alan T. Murray, 2014. "Serving regional demand in facility location," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 93(3), pages 643-662, August.
    8. Norton, Daniel & Hynes, Stephen, 2018. "Estimating the Benefits of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive in Atlantic Member States: A Spatial Value Transfer Approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 82-94.
    9. repec:iab:iabfme:200601(en is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Sébastien Breau & Dieter F. Kogler & Kenyon C. Bolton, 2014. "On the Relationship between Innovation and Wage Inequality: New Evidence from Canadian Cities," Economic Geography, Clark University, vol. 90(4), pages 351-373, October.
    11. Nigel Walford, 2013. "Development and Design of a Web-Based Interface to Address Geographical Incompatibility in Spatial Units," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 45(7), pages 1713-1733, July.
    12. Francesca Bitonti & Federico Benassi & Angelo Mazza & Salvatore Strozza, 2023. "Framing the Residential Patterns of Asian Communities in Three Italian Cities: Evidence from Milan, Rome, and Naples," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-29, August.
    13. Polash Banerjee & Mrinal K. Ghose, 2017. "A geographic information system-based socioeconomic impact assessment of the broadening of national highway in Sikkim Himalayas: a case study," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 19(6), pages 2333-2354, December.
    14. Sebastian Eichhorn, 2020. "Disaggregating Population Data and Evaluating the Accuracy of Modeled High-Resolution Population Distribution—The Case Study of Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-21, May.
    15. Alfredo Cartone & Domenica Panzera, 2021. "Deprivation at local level: Practical problems and policy implications for the province of Milan," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(1), pages 43-61, February.
    16. Connor, Dylan Shane & Berg, Aleksander K & Kemeny, Tom & Kedron, Peter, 2023. "Who gets left behind by left behind places?," SocArXiv nkydt, Center for Open Science.
    17. Peter Congdon, 2013. "Spatially Interpolated Disease Prevalence Estimation Using Collateral Indicators of Morbidity and Ecological Risk," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-15, October.
    18. Jeremy Forbes & Dianne Cook & Rob J Hyndman, 2019. "Spatial modelling of the two-party preferred vote in Australian federal elections: 2001-2016," Monash Econometrics and Business Statistics Working Papers 8/19, Monash University, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics.
    19. Dmowska Anna, 2019. "Dasymetric modelling of population distribution – large data approach," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 38(1), pages 15-27, March.
    20. David Martin & Chris Lloyd & Ian Shuttleworth, 2011. "Evaluation of Gridded Population Models Using 2001 Northern Ireland Census Data," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 43(8), pages 1965-1980, August.
    21. Jae Hong Kim, 2013. "Measuring the Containment and Spillover Effects of Urban Growth Boundaries: The Case of the Portland Metropolitan Area," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(4), pages 650-675, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:29:y:1997:i:2:p:333-347. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.