IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v21y1989i11p1511-1523.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Statistical Analysis of Spatial Data in the Presence of Missing Observations: A Methodological Guide and an Application to Urban Census Data

Author

Listed:
  • D A Griffith

    (Department of Geography, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244, USA)

  • R J Bennett

    (Department of Geography, London School of Economics, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE, England)

  • R P Haining

    (Department of Geography, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, England)

Abstract

In this paper a simple introduction and guide to a widely applicable method for estimating missing data in fields of enquiry such as census maps or LANDSAT images are presented. The method given is a maximum likelihood procedure. This is argued to have the particularly favourable characteristics (1) that its distribution properties are known, (2) it is applicable both to regularly and to irregularly spaced observations, (3) it can handle different spatial configurations of missing cells, (4) it makes full use of the information contained in the known spatial data (particularly its spatial autocorrelation), (5) it has no systematic tendency to error, and (6) it provides ‘probability limits’. The algorithm is presented in the form of a simple tutorial guide. An example, of median income levels in Houston, is worked through in detail for missing cells in census data. The example is characterised by a variable mean and a general variance — covariance matrix.

Suggested Citation

  • D A Griffith & R J Bennett & R P Haining, 1989. "Statistical Analysis of Spatial Data in the Presence of Missing Observations: A Methodological Guide and an Application to Urban Census Data," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 21(11), pages 1511-1523, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:21:y:1989:i:11:p:1511-1523
    DOI: 10.1068/a211511
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a211511
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a211511?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Giuseppe Arbia & Giuseppe Espa & Diego Giuliani, 2016. "Dirty spatial econometrics," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 56(1), pages 177-189, January.
    2. Morito Tsutsumi & Daisuke Murakami, 2014. "New Spatial Econometrics–Based Areal Interpolation Method," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 37(3), pages 273-297, July.
    3. Thomas Keywood & Jörg Baten, 2021. "Elite violence and elite numeracy in Europe from 500 to 1900 CE: roots of the divergence," Cliometrica, Journal of Historical Economics and Econometric History, Association Française de Cliométrie (AFC), vol. 15(2), pages 319-389, May.
    4. M F Goodchild & L Anselin & U Deichmann, 1993. "A Framework for the Areal Interpolation of Socioeconomic Data," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 25(3), pages 383-397, March.
    5. Takahisa Yokoi, 2018. "Spatial lag dependence in the presence of missing observations," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 60(1), pages 25-40, January.
    6. J. Paul Elhorst & Katarina Zigova, 2011. "Evidence of Competition in Research Activity among Economic Department using Spatial Econometric Techniques," Working Paper Series of the Department of Economics, University of Konstanz 2011-04, Department of Economics, University of Konstanz.
    7. Takafumi Kato, 2020. "Likelihood-based strategies for estimating unknown parameters and predicting missing data in the simultaneous autoregressive model," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 143-176, January.
    8. Baten, Jörg, 2019. "Elite Violence and Elite Numeracy in Europe from 500 to 1900 CE: A Co-Evolution?," CEPR Discussion Papers 14013, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:21:y:1989:i:11:p:1511-1523. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.