IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/entthe/v42y2018i2p340-345.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Commentary: Family Member Well-Being in the Kinship Enterprise: A Self-Determination Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Danielle Cooper
  • Whitney O. Peake

Abstract

Nordstrom and Jennings (2017) provide an in-depth view of the Hutterite Brethren community to theorize family business practices and their association with familial well-being. Drawing from self-determination theory, we extend their model to provide additional theoretical development regarding the role of task and enterprise practices in satisfying basic needs (autonomy, competence, and relatedness), promoting motivation, and fostering family member well-being. Although the Hutterite community’s practices likely facilitate high levels of competence and relatedness, there is potential for autonomy need deficits. As such, we address areas for future research regarding need fulfillment and well-being in family businesses.

Suggested Citation

  • Danielle Cooper & Whitney O. Peake, 2018. "Commentary: Family Member Well-Being in the Kinship Enterprise: A Self-Determination Perspective," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 42(2), pages 340-345, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:entthe:v:42:y:2018:i:2:p:340-345
    DOI: 10.1177/1042258717749238
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1042258717749238
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1042258717749238?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeffery S. McMullen & Benjamin J. Warnick, 2015. "To Nurture or Groom? The Parent–Founder Succession Dilemma," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 39(6), pages 1379-1412, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. James J. Chrisman & Jess H. Chua & Isabelle Le Breton-Miller & Danny Miller & Lloyd P. Steier, 2018. "Governance Mechanisms and Family Firms," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 42(2), pages 171-186, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zheng, Xiaojia & Zhu, Bing & Yang, Ge, 2023. "The soft landing: Does intrafamily succession matter for corporate risk-taking?," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    2. Bloemen-Bekx, Mira & Van Gils, Anita & Lambrechts, Frank & Sharma, Pramodita, 2021. "Nurturing offspring’s affective commitment through informal family governance mechanisms," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 12(2).
    3. Patrick Raymund James M. Garcia & Pramodita Sharma & Alfredo De Massis & Mike Wright & Louise Scholes, 2019. "Perceived Parental Behaviors and Next-Generation Engagement in Family Firms: A Social Cognitive Perspective," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 43(2), pages 224-243, March.
    4. Arndt Werner & Sabrina Schell & Ljuba Haunschild, 2021. "How does a succession influence investment decisions, credit financing and business performance in small and medium-sized family firms?," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 423-446, March.
    5. Schell, Sabrina & de Groote, Julia K. & Moog, Petra & Hack, Andreas, 2020. "Successor selection in family business—A signaling game," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 11(3).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    family business; professionalization;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:entthe:v:42:y:2018:i:2:p:340-345. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.