IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/enejou/v46y2025i6p43-89.html

Does Rural Household Electrification Improve Education in the Global South? Evidence from a Robust Bayesian Meta-Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Davidmac O. Ekeocha
  • Supriya Garikipati

Abstract

Lack of access to modern electrification limits educational progress, highlighting the critical role of energy interventions in advancing educational outcomes, particularly in developing countries. Despite increasing interest in this topic, the causal effects of energy interventions on educational outcomes in developing countries remain largely inconclusive. This paper consolidates existing evidence by conducting a meta-analysis of 33 studies using robust Bayesian model averaging methods, synthesizing 301 effect sizes. We evaluate the impact of modern energy interventions—including rural household electrification (RHE) and solar electrification—on nine distinct educational outcomes. Our findings indicate that these interventions substantially improve educational outcomes, particularly for children, with an average increase of 15.4 percentage points in key metrics such as educational attainment, school enrolment, and daily study hours. Specifically, RHE increases children’s daily study hours by 55 minutes and enhances lifetime earnings potential through additional schooling years, while solar electrification yields a 42-minute increase in study hours. However, effects on adult literacy and learning outcomes are weaker, suggesting that energy access must be complemented by targeted educational interventions. Heterogeneity in effect sizes underscores the importance of contextual factors, such as geography and demographics. Importantly, we detect no significant publication bias, and Hamiltonian Markov Chain meta-regressions reveal that household-level experimental designs yield more reliable estimates. These results highlight the transformative role of modern energy infrastructure in bridging educational gaps and fostering sustainable development. Policymakers are encouraged to prioritize investments in rural electrification and integrate energy access with broader educational and economic strategies, such as pairing electrification with enrolment and adult literacy programs to maximize impact. JEL Classification : P18, Q40, Q41, Q42, Q48, I00, I24

Suggested Citation

  • Davidmac O. Ekeocha & Supriya Garikipati, 2025. "Does Rural Household Electrification Improve Education in the Global South? Evidence from a Robust Bayesian Meta-Analysis," The Energy Journal, , vol. 46(6), pages 43-89, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:enejou:v:46:y:2025:i:6:p:43-89
    DOI: 10.1177/01956574251340007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/01956574251340007
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/01956574251340007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • P18 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Capitalist Economies - - - Energy; Environment
    • Q40 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - General
    • Q41 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Demand and Supply; Prices
    • Q42 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Alternative Energy Sources
    • Q48 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Government Policy
    • I00 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - General - - - General
    • I24 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Education and Inequality

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:enejou:v:46:y:2025:i:6:p:43-89. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.