IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ecoind/v12y1991i2p173-186.html

Democracy as 'Organizational Divorce' and How the Postmodern Democracy is Stifled by Unity and Majority

Author

Listed:
  • Ann Westenholz

    (Copenhagen Business School)

Abstract

Workplace democracy is brought up for discussion by the modern project and the postmodern condition. The modern project is represented by three fictitious eye-witnesses, who all seem to have succumbed to a modern repressive tolerance. Only one 'postmodern eye-witness' protests against the description of the democratic condition and challenges the three modernists by emphasizing the necessity of paradoxes and ruptures to acquire liberty. One facet of the liberating dialogue suggested by the postmodernist is to deconstruct the social system through divorce.

Suggested Citation

  • Ann Westenholz, 1991. "Democracy as 'Organizational Divorce' and How the Postmodern Democracy is Stifled by Unity and Majority," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 12(2), pages 173-186, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:ecoind:v:12:y:1991:i:2:p:173-186
    DOI: 10.1177/0143831X91122003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0143831X91122003
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0143831X91122003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Edward S. Greenberg, 1983. "Context and Cooperation: Systematic Variation in the Political Effects of Workplace Democracy," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 4(2), pages 191-223, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ann Westenholz, 1999. "From a Logic Perspective to a Paradox Perspective in the Analysis of an EmployeeOwned Company," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 20(4), pages 503-534, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Johannes Kiess & Andre Schmidt, 2025. "The political spillover of workplace democratization: How democratic efficacy at the workplace contributes to countering right-wing extremist attitudes in Germany," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 46(2), pages 469-495, May.
    2. Anthony Jensen, 2011. "Saving companies worth saving: Spain pioneers a sustainable model of democratic corporate governance," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 32(4), pages 697-720, November.
    3. Steven A. Peterson, 1992. "Workplace Politicization and its Political Spillovers: A Research Note," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 13(4), pages 511-524, November.
    4. Roger Spear, 1989. "Reviews," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 10(4), pages 564-567, November.
    5. Godfrey Baldacchino, 1990. "A War of Position: Ideas on a Strategy for Worker Cooperative Development," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 11(4), pages 463-482, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ecoind:v:12:y:1991:i:2:p:173-186. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ekhist.uu.se/english.htm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.