IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/clnure/v35y2026i1p6-13.html

Evaluating Treatment Burden in Patients with Complex Needs Receiving a Transition of Care Intervention: A Rapid Qualitative Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Elizabeth Bowen
  • Nina Ali
  • Amanda J. Anderson
  • Allana Krolikowski
  • Sharon Hewner

Abstract

Many patients, especially those with long-term conditions, face significant challenges in managing their health. Burden of treatment is the effort required for self-managing health. This burden is often intensified by social determinants of health, such as limited access to care and financial instability. Burden of treatment is understudied in socially and medically complex patients, particularly in the critical period of transitioning home after hospital discharge. To address this gap, this study analyzed data from telephone interviews with urban primary care patients who had been recently hospitalized and were identified by an algorithm as having complex medical and social needs, and received a nurse-led outreach call intervention to examine the following areas: (a) how patients with complex health and social needs experience burden of treatment following hospitalization; (b) the individual, interpersonal, and healthcare system factors that patients perceive as impacting burden of treatment; and (c) the impact of an outreach phone call on burden of treatment. The study team completed telephone interviews with 22 patients who received the outreach call intervention, using a semi-structured interview guide based on established treatment burden measurement tools. Interview data were analyzed using rapid qualitative data analysis techniques to identify key themes to answer the research questions. Findings indicated that most participants reported minimal treatment burden across key domains, such as understanding diagnoses, scheduling appointments, managing medications, and engaging in self-care. A minority experienced substantial difficulties, such as frustration with appointment scheduling and challenges with activities of daily living due to their conditions. Several factors were identified as influencing treatment burden, including health condition complexity, family support, and provider communication. Patients generally responded positively to the outreach calls, finding them reassuring and informative. Treatment burden is variable among medically and socially complex patients following hospitalization and is shaped by a number of individual, interpersonal, and healthcare system factors. Further research is needed to develop and evaluate interventions to build healthcare system capacity to serve this population, to minimize treatment burden.

Suggested Citation

  • Elizabeth Bowen & Nina Ali & Amanda J. Anderson & Allana Krolikowski & Sharon Hewner, 2026. "Evaluating Treatment Burden in Patients with Complex Needs Receiving a Transition of Care Intervention: A Rapid Qualitative Analysis," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 35(1), pages 6-13, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:35:y:2026:i:1:p:6-13
    DOI: 10.1177/10547738251378678
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10547738251378678
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/10547738251378678?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sangduan Ginggeaw & Raeann LeBlanc & Joohyun Chung, 2025. "Social Determinants of Quality of Life in the Last Year of Life Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults with Multimorbidity," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 34(2), pages 107-119, February.
    2. Benissa E. Salem & Helena Almeida & Sarah Akure Wall & Kartik Yadav & Alicia H. Chang & Lillian Gelberg & Adeline Nyamathi, 2024. "Exploring the Perspectives of Unhoused Adults and Providers Across the HCV Care Continuum," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 33(7), pages 519-529, September.
    3. Michael Rosbach & John Sahl Andersen, 2017. "Patient-experienced burden of treatment in patients with multimorbidity – A systematic review of qualitative data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(6), pages 1-18, June.
    4. Rosalind Adam & Revathi Nair & Lisa F Duncan & Esyn Yeoh & Joanne Chan & Vaselisa Vilenskaya & Katie I Gallacher, 2023. "Treatment burden in individuals living with and beyond cancer: A systematic review of qualitative literature," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(5), pages 1-20, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cheng Cheng & Jie Bai & Cong‐Yan Yang & Ming Li & Kerry Inder & Sally Wai‐Chi Chan, 2019. "Patients' experiences of coping with multiple chronic conditions: A qualitative descriptive study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(23-24), pages 4400-4411, December.
    2. Lawless, Michael T. & Tieu, Matthew & Feo, Rebecca & Kitson, Alison L., 2021. "Theories of self-care and self-management of long-term conditions by community-dwelling older adults: A systematic review and meta-ethnography," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 287(C).
    3. Shikha Gupta & Mary Ann McColl & Sara J.T. Guilcher & Karen Smith, 2019. "Managing Medication Cost Burden: A Qualitative Study Exploring Experiences of People with Disabilities in Canada," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-17, August.
    4. Farah Tahsin & Carolyn Steele Gray & Jay Shaw & Aviv Shachak, 2024. "Exploring the relationship between telehealth utilization and treatment burden among patients with chronic conditions: A cross-sectional study in Ontario, Canada," PLOS Digital Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(10), pages 1-18, October.
    5. repec:bjf:journl:v:10:y:2025:i:10:p:2656-2668 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Samuel X. Stevens & Ella El-Katateny & Isaac Yeboah Addo & Deborah Street & Christopher Booth & Joanne Shaw & Janette L. Vardy & Richard De Abreu Lourenco, 2026. "How Important is Healthcare-Contact Time to Systemic Treatment Decision-Making in Advanced Gastrointestinal Cancers: Developing Attributes to Include in a Discrete Choice Experiment," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 19(2), pages 269-284, March.
    7. Léontine Goldzahl & Jonathan Stokes & Matt Sutton, 2022. "The effects of multi‐disciplinary integrated care on healthcare utilization: Evidence from a natural experiment in the UK," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(10), pages 2142-2169, October.
    8. repec:plo:pone00:0245112 is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:35:y:2026:i:1:p:6-13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.