IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/clnure/v26y2017i4p399-418.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Success Stories: Overcoming Barriers to Research in Southern and Eastern African Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Carolyn Sun
  • Priscilla S. Dlamini
  • Margaret C. Maimbolwa
  • Cynthia Changala Lukwesa Mukonka
  • Rudo Nyamakura
  • Grace Omoni
  • Naomi Seboni
  • Elaine Larson

Abstract

There is an ever-growing need for clinically focused, culturally relevant research on which nurses can base their practice. However, there may not be a concurrent rise in efforts to strengthen infrastructure needed to promote research in developing and low-income countries. In such cases, nurse researchers must find innovative ways to address and overcome barriers to research. This article presents five exemplars of nurses conducting high-quality nursing research in resource-poor settings in southern and eastern Africa. Furthermore, it suggests strategies to address these barriers, such as piggybacking on larger studies, interdisciplinary collaboration, and partnership with influential stakeholders. These tactics may be used to increase research productivity elsewhere.

Suggested Citation

  • Carolyn Sun & Priscilla S. Dlamini & Margaret C. Maimbolwa & Cynthia Changala Lukwesa Mukonka & Rudo Nyamakura & Grace Omoni & Naomi Seboni & Elaine Larson, 2017. "Success Stories: Overcoming Barriers to Research in Southern and Eastern African Countries," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 26(4), pages 399-418, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:26:y:2017:i:4:p:399-418
    DOI: 10.1177/1054773817718935
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1054773817718935
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1054773817718935?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rick Rylance, 2015. "Grant giving: Global funders to focus on interdisciplinarity," Nature, Nature, vol. 525(7569), pages 313-315, September.
    2. Lindell Bromham & Russell Dinnage & Xia Hua, 2016. "Interdisciplinary research has consistently lower funding success," Nature, Nature, vol. 534(7609), pages 684-687, June.
    3. Kathryn M Chu & Sudha Jayaraman & Patrick Kyamanywa & Georges Ntakiyiruta, 2014. "Building Research Capacity in Africa: Equity and Global Health Collaborations," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-4, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fontana, Magda & Iori, Martina & Leone Sciabolazza, Valerio & Souza, Daniel, 2022. "The interdisciplinarity dilemma: Public versus private interests," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(7).
    2. Bing Li & Shiji Chen & Vincent Larivière, 2023. "Interdisciplinarity affects the technological impact of scientific research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(12), pages 6527-6559, December.
    3. Max Oke Kluger & Gerhard Bartzke, 2020. "A practical guideline how to tackle interdisciplinarity—A synthesis from a post-graduate group project," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-11, December.
    4. Du, Anbang & Head, Michael & Brede, Markus, 2025. "Integration vs segregation: Network analysis of interdisciplinarity in funded and unfunded research on infectious diseases," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 19(1).
    5. Jane Freedman & Tamaryn L. Crankshaw & Yasmin Rajah & Victoria Marcia Mutambara, 2024. "“But We Just Need Money”: (Im)Possibilities of Co‐Producing Knowledge With Those in Vulnerable Situations," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 12.
    6. Jürgen Janger & Nicole Schmidt-Padickakudy & Anna Strauss-Kollin, 2019. "International Differences in Basic Research Grant Funding. A Systematic Comparison," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 61664, June.
    7. Fabio Silva & Fiona Coward & Kimberley Davies & Sarah Elliott & Emma Jenkins & Adrian C. Newton & Philip Riris & Marc Vander Linden & Jennifer Bates & Elena Cantarello & Daniel A. Contreras & Stefani , 2022. "Developing Transdisciplinary Approaches to Sustainability Challenges: The Need to Model Socio-Environmental Systems in the Longue Durée," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-20, August.
    8. Lina Xu & Steven Dellaportas & Zhiqiang Yang & Jin Wang, 2023. "More on the relationship between interdisciplinary accounting research and citation impact," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(4), pages 4779-4803, December.
    9. Li, Heyang & Wu, Meijun & Wang, Yougui & Zeng, An, 2022. "Bibliographic coupling networks reveal the advantage of diversification in scientific projects," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(3).
    10. Yu, Xiaoyao & Szymanski, Boleslaw K. & Jia, Tao, 2021. "Become a better you: Correlation between the change of research direction and the change of scientific performance," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 15(3).
    11. Lawson, Cornelia & Salter, Ammon, 2023. "Exploring the effect of overlapping institutional applications on panel decision-making," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(9).
    12. Xin Liu & Yi Bu & Ming Li & Jiang Li, 2024. "Monodisciplinary collaboration disrupts science more than multidisciplinary collaboration," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 75(1), pages 59-78, January.
    13. Xiaolan Wu & Chengzhi Zhang, 2019. "Finding high-impact interdisciplinary users based on friend discipline distribution in academic social networking sites," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 119(2), pages 1017-1035, May.
    14. Laurens K. Hessels & Stefan P.L. De Jong & Stijn Brouwer, 2018. "Collaboration between Heterogeneous Practitioners in Sustainability Research: A Comparative Analysis of Three Transdisciplinary Programmes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-16, December.
    15. Kateryna Wowk & Larry McKinney & Frank Muller-Karger & Russell Moll & Susan Avery & Elva Escobar-Briones & David Yoskowitz & Richard McLaughlin, 2017. "Evolving academic culture to meet societal needs," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 3(1), pages 1-7, December.
    16. Shuwen Wang & Minglu Li & Jianping Li & Dengsheng Wu, 2025. "Do researchers from prestigious universities deserve advantages in research funding? Evidence from the National Natural Science Foundation of China," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(3), pages 1587-1615, March.
    17. Feng Shi & James Evans, 2023. "Surprising combinations of research contents and contexts are related to impact and emerge with scientific outsiders from distant disciplines," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
    18. Paulina Phoobane & Muthoni Masinde & Tafadzwanashe Mabhaudhi, 2022. "Predicting Infectious Diseases: A Bibliometric Review on Africa," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-20, February.
    19. Fei Shu & Jesse David Dinneen & Shiji Chen, 2022. "Measuring the disparity among scientific disciplines using Library of Congress Subject Headings," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(6), pages 3613-3628, June.
    20. Xiaojing Cai & Xiaozan Lyu & Ping Zhou, 2023. "The relationship between interdisciplinarity and citation impact—a novel perspective on citation accumulation," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-12, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:26:y:2017:i:4:p:399-418. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.