IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/chnrpt/v56y2020i4p484-500.html

Contest for Dominance: US–China Rivalry in Asia

Author

Listed:
  • Mintu Barua

    (Centre for Research in Indo-Bangladesh Relations, Kolkata, India.)

Abstract

There is an ongoing debate whether China is a satisfied power or a dissatisfied revisionist power. On the basis of the concept of regime insecurity and power transition theory, this article argues that the resolution of this debate mainly depends on some essentially interrelated complex factors—China’s assertive behaviour, China’s core interests, China’s internal security, and China’s involvement in territorial disputes. Moreover, this article examines the validity of the usual claim of power transition theory that the dominant power is always satisfied with the status quo, and contrary to this idea of power transition theory, this article suggests that the dominant power can be dissatisfied and revisionist too if its hegemony is under threat.

Suggested Citation

  • Mintu Barua, 2020. "Contest for Dominance: US–China Rivalry in Asia," China Report, , vol. 56(4), pages 484-500, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:chnrpt:v:56:y:2020:i:4:p:484-500
    DOI: 10.1177/0009445520963415
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0009445520963415
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0009445520963415?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lant Pritchett & Lawrence H. Summers, 2014. "Asiaphoria Meets Regression to the Mean," NBER Working Papers 20573, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Patel, Dev & Sandefur, Justin & Subramanian, Arvind, 2021. "The new era of unconditional convergence," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    2. J. Daniel Aromí, 2018. "GDP growth forecasts and information flows: Is there evidence of overreactions?," International Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(2), pages 122-139, June.
    3. Davide Fiaschi & Andrea Mario Lavezzi & Angela Parenti, 2020. "Deep and Proximate Determinants of the World Income Distribution," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 66(3), pages 677-710, September.
    4. repec:bla:glopol:v:8:y:2017:i:s4:p:42-53 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Tomas Hellebrandt & Paolo Mauro, 2015. "The Future of Worldwide Income Distribution," Working Paper Series WP15-7, Peterson Institute for International Economics.
    6. Giang Ho & Paolo Mauro, 2014. "Rapid Growth in Emerging Markets and Developing Economies: Now and Forever?," Policy Briefs PB14-26, Peterson Institute for International Economics.
    7. Grinis, Inna, 2017. "Trend growth durations & shifts," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 85126, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Chun-kei Tsang & Sung-ko Li, 2020. "Allocation of resources within subgroups of an industry: a case study in the Chinese industrial sector," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 53(1), pages 125-139, February.
    9. Jose De Gregorio, 2015. "From Rapid Recovery to Slowdown: Why Recent Economic Growth in Latin America Has Been Slow," Policy Briefs PB15-6, Peterson Institute for International Economics.
    10. Barry Eichengreen & Donghyun Park & Kwanho Shin, 2018. "The Landscape of Economic Growth: Do Middle-Income Countries Differ?," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(4), pages 836-858, March.
    11. Sabyasachi Kar & Selim Raihan & Kunal Sen, 2017. "Do economic institutions matter for growth episodes?," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series esid-092-17, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    12. Raghbendra Jha, 2018. "India's Long Road: The Search for Prosperity," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 94(305), pages 207-209, June.
    13. Klaus-Peter Hellwig, 2018. "Overfitting in Judgment-based Economic Forecasts: The Case of IMF Growth Projections," IMF Working Papers 2018/260, International Monetary Fund.
    14. Sanghamitra Bandyopadhyay, 2021. "The persistence of inequality across Indian states: A time series approach," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(3), pages 1150-1171, August.
    15. Enrica Di Stefano & Daniela Marconi, 2015. "Assessing potential growth in emerging countries after the global financial crisis," Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers) 256, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    16. Xu, Cheng-Gang, 2014. "Political and Economic Institutions of China and Their Influences," CEPR Discussion Papers 10320, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    17. Juan Antolin-Diaz & Thomas Drechsel & Ivan Petrella, 2017. "Tracking the Slowdown in Long-Run GDP Growth," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 99(2), pages 343-356, May.
    18. Otsuka, Keijiro & Higuchi, Yuki & Sonobe, Tetsushi, 2017. "Middle-income traps in East Asia: An inquiry into causes for slowdown in income growth," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(S), pages 3-16.
    19. Guanghua Wan & Peter J. Morgan & Jong-Wha Lee, 2016. "Korea's Economic Growth and Catch-up: Implications for China," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 24(5), pages 71-97, September.
    20. Xu, Kun & Xu, Wenli, 2015. "中国政府消费支出对经济波动的传导机理分析 [Study on Influential Mechanism Between Government Expenditure of Consumption and Economic Fluctuation]," MPRA Paper 70994, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Dec 2015.
    21. Helmut K. Anheier & Robert Falkner & Alanna Krolikowski, 2017. "Brittle China? Economic and Political Fragility with Global Implications," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 8, pages 42-53, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:chnrpt:v:56:y:2020:i:4:p:484-500. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.