IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ausman/v28y2003i1p83-96.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Geared Equity Investments: A Case Study of Tax Arbitrage Down Under

Author

Listed:
  • Charles J. Corrado

    (Department of Accounting and Finance. Private Bag 92019 University of Auckland, New Zealand.)

  • Joe Cheung

    (Department of Accounting and Finance. Private Bag 92019 University of Auckland, New Zealand.)

Abstract

Geared Equity Investment (GEI) contracts are an over-the-counter financial derivative product offered by Macquarie Bank, Ltd, to individual investors in Australia and New Zealand as a managed-risk investment in local shares carrying significant tax shield benefits. Upon issuance, a geared equity contract has three stakeholders: (1) the investor; (2) the issuer; and (3) the national tax authority. We assess the value of these contracts to each stakeholder and their support for tax arbitrage. We find that the national tax authority provides a significant subsidy to GEI contracts via tax shield benefits. These benefits support investor tax arbitrage in certain cases and issuer tax arbitrage in all cases examined.

Suggested Citation

  • Charles J. Corrado & Joe Cheung, 2003. "Geared Equity Investments: A Case Study of Tax Arbitrage Down Under," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 28(1), pages 83-96, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:ausman:v:28:y:2003:i:1:p:83-96
    DOI: 10.1177/031289620302800104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/031289620302800104
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/031289620302800104?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wood, Justin, 1997. "A simple model for pricing imputation tax credits under Australias dividend imputation tax system," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 5(4), pages 465-480, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lim, Terence & Lo, Andrew W. & Merton, Robert C. & Scholes, Myron S., 2006. "The Derivatives Sourcebook," Foundations and Trends(R) in Finance, now publishers, vol. 1(5–6), pages 365-572, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Balachandran, Balasingham & Khan, Arifur & Mather, Paul & Theobald, Michael, 2019. "Insider ownership and dividend policy in an imputation tax environment," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 153-167.
    2. Robert Faff & David Hillier & Justin Wood, 2000. "Beta and Return: Implications of Australia's Dividend Imputation Tax System," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 25(3), pages 245-260, December.
    3. Anh Le & Xiangkang Yin & Jing Zhao, 2022. "The Capitalization Effect of Imputation Credits on Expected Stock Returns," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 58(3), pages 523-566, September.
    4. Jeffrey J. Coulton & Caitlin Ruddock, 2011. "Corporate payout policy in Australia and a test of the life‐cycle theory," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 51(2), pages 381-407, June.
    5. Martin Lally & Tony Van Zijl, 2003. "Capital gains tax and the capital asset pricing model," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 43(2), pages 187-210, July.
    6. Lally, Martin, 2000. "Valuation of companies and projects under differential personal taxation," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 8(1), pages 115-133, March.
    7. Martin Lally, 2006. "Regulatory Revenues and the Choice of the CAPM: Australia Versus New Zealand," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 31(2), pages 313-331, December.
    8. Robert Faff, 2014. "Alpha," Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems, Faculty of Accounting and Management Information Systems, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 13(4), pages 607-622, December.
    9. Murphy, A. & Schlag, C., 1999. "An empirical examination of the effect of dividend taxation on asset pricing and returns in Germany," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 35-52.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ausman:v:28:y:2003:i:1:p:83-96. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.agsm.edu.au .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.