IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/asseca/v11y2024i1p76-93.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Combinative Hedging: Japan and Russia in the East Asian Contested Hierarchical Order

Author

Listed:
  • Yohanes Putra Suhito
  • I Gede Wahyu Wicaksana

Abstract

The recent developments in world politics have demonstrated that East Asia has emerged as a critical locus for great power politics, characterised by the pluralisation of power centres resulting from the competing strategic interests of the United States and China. Indeed, the regional order’s power constellation is moving towards a contested hierarchical model. The first-tier United States seeks to maintain its ‘plural hegemony’ through social compacts, while China fits within the hierarchy as a second-tier state, gradually emerging as an influential actor on the regional and global stage. Third-tier states, such as Japan, the world’s third-largest economy, and Russia, with its abundant energy resources and military prowess, have become potential swing players of influence within the evolving orders— appropriate to their respective capabilities. Observing this dynamic geopolitical environment, our article discusses the relationship between Japan and Russia as they attempt to protect their interests within a pluralising region. We argue that Japan and Russia take a combinative hedge, focusing on flexible collaboration, enabling risk mitigation and maximising short or long-term benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Yohanes Putra Suhito & I Gede Wahyu Wicaksana, 2024. "Combinative Hedging: Japan and Russia in the East Asian Contested Hierarchical Order," Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs, , vol. 11(1), pages 76-93, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:asseca:v:11:y:2024:i:1:p:76-93
    DOI: 10.1177/23477970241230378
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23477970241230378
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23477970241230378?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:asseca:v:11:y:2024:i:1:p:76-93. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.