IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/amsocr/v89y2024i4p684-707.html

Civic Lessons That Last? Religiosity and Volunteering on the Way to Adulthood

Author

Listed:
  • Chaeyoon Lim
  • Dingeman Wiertz

Abstract

Recent religious declines in the United States are for a large part driven by the growing number of Americans who were raised religiously but left religion in the transition to adulthood. Nonetheless, their views and behaviors may still be influenced by their religious upbringing. We explore such legacy effects by examining how changing religiosity during the transition to adulthood influences volunteering among young adults. Analyzing panel data from the National Study of Youth and Religion, we estimate two types of effects: effects of cumulative religious trajectories in youth, and effects of religiosity in youth that are not mediated by religiosity in adulthood. We find that histories of religious involvement shape volunteering in adulthood, but the precise nature of such effects varies across dimensions of religiosity and types of volunteering. Religious service attendance in youth promotes volunteering in adulthood mostly indirectly, through influencing religiosity in adulthood, and exclusively for activities organized by religious groups. By contrast, religious identification in youth promotes volunteering in adulthood also through other channels, and its effects on secular volunteering may persist even when people are not religious in adulthood. We discuss the implications of these findings in light of ongoing declines in religiosity in the United States.

Suggested Citation

  • Chaeyoon Lim & Dingeman Wiertz, 2024. "Civic Lessons That Last? Religiosity and Volunteering on the Way to Adulthood," American Sociological Review, , vol. 89(4), pages 684-707, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:amsocr:v:89:y:2024:i:4:p:684-707
    DOI: 10.1177/00031224241258791
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00031224241258791
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00031224241258791?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Putnam, Robert David & Lim, Chaeyoon & MacGregor, Carol Ann, 2010. "Secular and Liminal: Discovering Heterogeneity among Religious Nones," Scholarly Articles 5341589, Harvard Kennedy School of Government.
    2. Ilana M. Horwitz & Kaylee T. Matheny & Krystal Laryea & Landon Schnabel, 2022. "From Bat Mitzvah to the Bar: Religious Habitus, Self-Concept, and Women’s Educational Outcomes," American Sociological Review, , vol. 87(2), pages 336-372, April.
    3. Zhou, Xiang & Wodtke, Geoffrey T., 2020. "Residual Balancing: A Method of Constructing Weights for Marginal Structural Models," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 28(4), pages 487-506, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jason Wollschleger & Lindsey R. Beach, 2013. "Religious chameleons: Exploring the social context for belonging without believing," Rationality and Society, , vol. 25(2), pages 178-197, May.
    2. Jean M. Twenge & Ryne A. Sherman & Julie J. Exline & Joshua B. Grubbs, 2016. "Declines in American Adults’ Religious Participation and Beliefs, 1972-2014," SAGE Open, , vol. 6(1), pages 21582440166, March.
    3. Masakure, Oliver, 2016. "The effect of employee loyalty on wages," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 274-298.
    4. repec:plo:pone00:0121454 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Ayse Guveli & Lucinda Platt, 2023. "Religiosity of Migrants and Natives in Western Europe 2002–2018: Convergence and Divergence," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 39(1), pages 1-27, December.
    6. Jelena Bradic & Weijie Ji & Yuqian Zhang, 2021. "High-dimensional Inference for Dynamic Treatment Effects," Papers 2110.04924, arXiv.org, revised May 2023.
    7. Maryam Dilmaghani, 2018. "Which is greener: secularity or religiosity? Environmental philanthropy along religiosity spectrum," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 20(2), pages 477-502, April.
    8. Miles S. Marsala, 2019. "Approval of Euthanasia: Differences Between Cohorts and Religion," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(1), pages 21582440198, March.
    9. Henrik-Alexander Schubert & Vegard Skirbekk & Jessica Nisén, 2024. "Secularization and low fertility: how declining church membership changes couples and their childbearing," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2024-040, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
    10. Maryam Dilmaghani, 2019. "Religiosity, Secularity and Fertility in Canada," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 35(2), pages 403-428, May.
    11. Maryam Dilmaghani, 2021. "Deep-Level Religious Diversity and Work-Life Balance Satisfaction in Canada," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 16(1), pages 315-350, February.
    12. Sean Yiu & Li Su, 2022. "Joint calibrated estimation of inverse probability of treatment and censoring weights for marginal structural models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(1), pages 115-127, March.
    13. Adam Gemar, 2024. "Institutional Trust, Spirituality, and Religious Practice in the United States," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, January.
    14. Adam Gemar, 2024. "Religion and Social Capital: Examining Social Networks and Religious Identification in the UK," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 29(1), pages 23-40, March.
    15. Jesse Zhou & Geoffrey T. Wodtke, 2025. "Causal Mediation Analysis with Multiple Mediators: A Simulation Approach," Papers 2506.14019, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:amsocr:v:89:y:2024:i:4:p:684-707. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.