IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rse/wpaper/v5y2013i1p44-52.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The ICT use in the implementation of Directive 2011/24/EU

Author

Listed:
  • Ana Pinto Borges

    (CEF.UP and Lusíada University, Porto, Portugal)

  • Claudia Cardoso

    (Polytechnic Institute of Cávado and Ave, ESG / CICF, Barcelos, Portugal)

Abstract

This article has as main objective to evaluate the role of information and communication technologies (ICTs), in particular the eHealth (electronic health), in the implementation of the directive 2011/24/EU, of the European Parliament and of the Council of March 9th, on the exercise of patients' rights in cross-border healthcare within Member States of European Union. Being currently underway the deadline for transposition of the Directive, it is important to analyze the probable results for national health systems. Innovatively, the Directive specifically proposes the implementation of a European network of eHealth in the provision of cross-border healthcare. Within ICT, we focus on telemedicine as a key tool for the implementation, on a context of public budgets constrains. In this context, it is assumed that the EU will support and promote cooperation and the exchange of scientific information between member states within the framework of a voluntary network composed by the national authorities responsible for health (or eHealth). We apply the S.W.O.T. (strengths and weaknesses, opportunities and threats) analysis to forecast the main points that should be focused on deeper research. We discuss the technological, economic and social aspects of the use of ICT on the implementation of the directive. It is thus important to evaluate the context of ICT by S.W.O.T. tool to define strategies to sensitize policy-makers, health managers, and citizens, in order to be able to turn threats into opportunities and mitigating the weaknesses in the implementation of the Directive and to promote a better healthcare access for citizens, ensuring safe, effective healthcare and with different quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Ana Pinto Borges & Claudia Cardoso, 2013. "The ICT use in the implementation of Directive 2011/24/EU," Review of Applied Socio-Economic Research, Pro Global Science Association, vol. 5(1), pages 44-52, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:rse:wpaper:v:5:y:2013:i:1:p:44-52
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://reaser.eu/RePec/rse/wpaper/R5_4_Borges_Cardoso_p44_52.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeffrey S. McCullough & Stephen T. Parente & Robert Town, 2013. "Health Information Technology and Patient Outcomes: The Role of Organizational and Informational Complementarities," NBER Working Papers 18684, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Seth Freedman & Haizhen Lin & Jeffrey Prince, 2018. "Does Competition Lead to Agglomeration or Dispersion in EMR Vendor Decisions?," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 53(1), pages 57-79, August.
    2. Amalia R. Miller & Catherine Tucker, 2017. "Frontiers of Health Policy: Digital Data and Personalized Medicine," Innovation Policy and the Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 17(1), pages 49-75.
    3. Sung J. Choi & M. Eric Johnson, 2019. "Do Hospital Data Breaches Reduce Patient Care Quality?," Papers 1904.02058, arXiv.org.
    4. Dranove, David & Garthwaite, Craig & Li, Bingyang & Ody, Christopher, 2015. "Investment subsidies and the adoption of electronic medical records in hospitals," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 309-319.
    5. García-Romero, Antonio & Escribano, Álvaro & Tribó, Josep A., 2017. "The impact of health research on length of stay in Spanish public hospitals," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 591-604.
    6. Seth Freedman & Haizhen Lin & Jeffrey Prince, 2018. "Information Technology and Patient Health: Analyzing Outcomes, Populations, and Mechanisms," American Journal of Health Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 4(1), pages 51-79, Winter.
    7. Andrew I. Friedson, 2018. "Medical Scribes as an Input in Health-Care Production: Evidence from a Randomized Experiment," American Journal of Health Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 4(4), pages 479-503, Fall.
    8. Seth Freedman & Haizhen Lin & Jeffrey T. Prince, 2014. "Information Technology and Patient Health: An Expanded Analysis of Outcomes, Populations, and Mechanisms," Working Papers 2014-02, Indiana University, Kelley School of Business, Department of Business Economics and Public Policy.
    9. Carole Roan Gresenz & Scott P. Laughery & Amalia Miller & Catherine E Tucker, 2015. "Health IT and Ambulatory Care Quality," Working Papers WR-1131, RAND Corporation.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    health systems; ICT; European Union;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I10 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - General
    • O30 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - General
    • O52 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies - - - Europe

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rse:wpaper:v:5:y:2013:i:1:p:44-52. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Manuela Epure (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/pgsaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.