IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/merase/v1y2026i1p21-43.html

Effectiveness of Risk Management in Healthcare Organisations During Health Crises: A Systematic Review

Author

Listed:
  • Alexandra PÃŽRCÄ‚LÄ‚BOIU
  • Carmen Nadia CIOCOIU
  • Camelia CAZONI
  • Irina GABOROI BÄ‚LUÈš

Abstract

Following the COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare systems continue to face persistent risks, highlighting the need to implement effective risk management systems to ensure safe practice. By combining bibliometric analysis with a systematic literature review, the article identifies and classifies risk management approaches examined in the context of health crises, as well as the barriers and success factors influencing their implementation. The database used comprises 541 publications extracted from the Web of Science, and the analysis was conducted using the RStudio software through the Biblioshiny interface. The application of the PRISMA-P 2020 methodology enables the identification of major research trends, applied methodologies, and insufficiently explored areas in the existing literature. The study highlights the interconnection between risk management and the continuity of healthcare services, with particular emphasis on the role of strategic planning and digital tools in mitigating the impact of health crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic. The conclusions provide relevant benchmarks for future research directions and for improving decision-making processes within healthcare organisations.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexandra PÃŽRCÄ‚LÄ‚BOIU & Carmen Nadia CIOCOIU & Camelia CAZONI & Irina GABOROI BÄ‚LUÈš, 2026. "Effectiveness of Risk Management in Healthcare Organisations During Health Crises: A Systematic Review," Management and Economics Review, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 1(1), pages 21-43, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:rom:merase:v:1:y:2026:i:1:p:21-43
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mer.ase.ro/files/2026-1/11-1-2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hemin Choi & Wonhyuk Cho & Min-Hyu Kim & Joon-Young Hur, 2020. "Public Health Emergency and Crisis Management: Case Study of SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-14, June.
    2. Drew Sugaretty, 2012. "Risk Management in a Pandemic Crisis at a Global Non Profit Health Care Organization," International Journal of Risk and Contingency Management (IJRCM), IGI Global Scientific Publishing, vol. 1(4), pages 1-17, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Antonio Jesús Ramos-Morcillo & César Leal-Costa & José Enrique Moral-García & María Ruzafa-Martínez, 2020. "Experiences of Nursing Students during the Abrupt Change from Face-to-Face to e-Learning Education during the First Month of Confinement Due to COVID-19 in Spain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-15, July.
    2. Lukas Zenk & Gerald Steiner & Miguel Pina e Cunha & Manfred D. Laubichler & Martin Bertau & Martin J. Kainz & Carlo Jäger & Eva S. Schernhammer, 2020. "Fast Response to Superspreading: Uncertainty and Complexity in the Context of COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-13, October.
    3. Boram Sim & Eun Woo Nam, 2022. "The Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Outpatient Visits for All-Cause and Chronic Diseases in Korea: A Nationwide Population-Based Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-10, May.
    4. Watchara Amasiri & Kritsasith Warin & Karicha Mairiang & Chatchai Mingmalairak & Wararit Panichkitkosolkul & Krittin Silanun & Rachasak Somyanonthanakul & Thanaruk Theeramunkong & Surapon Nitikraipot , 2021. "Analysis of Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes for Crisis Management during the Four Waves of the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-9, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • I10 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - General
    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health
    • D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:merase:v:1:y:2026:i:1:p:21-43. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ciocoiu Nadia Carmen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mnasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.