IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rnp/ecopol/ep2308.html

Sanctions, Exit of Foreign Companies and Business Activity in the Russian Regions
[Санкции, Уход Иностранных Компаний И Деловая Активность В Регионах России]

Author

Listed:
  • Zemtsov, Stepan (Земцов, Степан)

    (Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration)

  • Barinova, Vera (Баринова, Вера)

    (Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration)

  • Mikhailov, Alexander (Михайлов, Александр)

    (Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration)

Abstract

Despite the limited markets now available to entrepreneurs and the disruption of supply chains, many indicators of business activity in Russia did not decrease in 2022. However, there are significant differences between regions in their response to these external shocks. The article evaluates factors that brought about changes in the most pertinent indicator of business activity – the growth in the number of new small and medium-sized businesses. First, in regions where economic ties with the countries that imposed sanctions were weaker, there were more such new businesses. In some regions that produce raw materials, those countries annually accounted for more than 80% of exports and imports. Second, the withdrawal of companies from Russia may open up certain market niches (in trade, IT, other services, and processing). The revenue of enterprises from countries deemed unfriendly by the Russian government was about 16 trillion rubles, or about one tenth of the market. The hypothesis that this amount of revenue had a positive effect on the number of newly created small and medium-sized enterprises because of less competition in certain market niches was confirmed provisionally and with a low degree of significance. Third, just as the online sector provided one way of adapting to a crisis during the pandemic, the ubiquitous reach of online trading platforms along with access to parallel imports came into play. In regions where businesses and the public placed more orders for goods and services via the internet, more new enterprises were created. The hypothesis that proximity to unfriendly countries had a negative impact on business activity in the regions at their borders was confirmed. And vice versa, the proximity to Georgia and Azerbaijan had a positive effect as the flow of goods and tourists was redirected toward the North Caucasus. The scale and diversity of markets due to large economic agglomerations in the regions was also beneficial. These observations bear on a number of recommendations.

Suggested Citation

  • Zemtsov, Stepan (Земцов, Степан) & Barinova, Vera (Баринова, Вера) & Mikhailov, Alexander (Михайлов, Александр), 2023. "Sanctions, Exit of Foreign Companies and Business Activity in the Russian Regions [Санкции, Уход Иностранных Компаний И Деловая Активность В Регионах России]," Ekonomicheskaya Politika / Economic Policy, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 2, pages 44-79, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:rnp:ecopol:ep2308
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repec.ranepa.ru/rnp/ecopol/ep2308.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chepurenko, A., 2012. "What is Entrepreneurship and What Entrepreneurship Policy Does Russia Need? (Marginal Notes on Works of Modern Foreign Classics)," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 14(2), pages 102-124.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zemtsov, S. & Voloshinskaya, A., 2024. "Russian regional resilience under sanctions," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 64(3), pages 54-83.
    2. Anastasia Sherubneva, 2025. "Impact of COVID-19 on outputs of small and medium enterprises in Russia: A spatial view," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 79, pages 121-143.
    3. Zemtsov, S., 2025. "Sources of business activity growth in the Russian regions during the external shocks," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 66(1), pages 291-300.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alexander Chepurenko, 2017. "Combining Universal Concepts with National Specifics: SME Support Policy," Public administration issues, Higher School of Economics, issue 1, pages 7-30.
    2. Victoria Golikova & Boris Kuznetsov, 2017. "Suboptimal Size: Factors Preventing the Growth of Russian Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises," Foresight and STI Governance, National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 11(3), pages 83-93.
    3. Natalya Solodilova & Rustam Malikov & Konstantin Grishin, 2014. "Generation Favorable Institutional Configuration Regional Business Environment," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(4), pages 271-282.
    4. Zemtsov, S. & Tsareva, Y., 2018. "Entrepreneurial Activity in the Russian Regions: How Spatial and Temporal Effects Determine the Development of Small Business," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 37(1), pages 145-165.
    5. Alexander Larin & Elena Tarunina, 2015. "Entrepreneurial activity and economic development: The shape of the relationship," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 37(1), pages 3-26.
    6. Tatiana Khavenson & Diana Koroleva & Anastasia Lukina, 2019. "The Four Motives Of Educational Innovators," HSE Working papers WP BRP 52/EDU/2019, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    7. Zemtsov, S., 2020. "Institutions, entrepreneurship, and regional development in Russia," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 46(2), pages 168-180.
    8. Chigrin, A., 2018. "Small Business and the Competitiveness of Russia: An Unconventional View," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 39(3), pages 110-126.
    9. Natalya Solodilova & Rustam Malikov & Konstantin Grishin, 2017. "Regional Entrepreneurship System: Development Parameters and Potential of Reconfiguration," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(4), pages 1107-1122.
    10. Elizaveta V. Martyanova & Andrey V. Polbin, 2023. "General equilibrium model with the entrepreneurial sector for the Russian economy," Russian Journal of Economics, ARPHA Platform, vol. 9(2), pages 109-133, July.
    11. V. A. Barinova & S. P. Zemtsov, 2023. "From Direct SMEs’ Support to Entrepreneurship Policy in Russia: Why Do Regional Entrepreneurial Ecosystems Matter?," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 440-457, September.
    12. Pavel L. Glukhikh & Alla N. Golovina, 2021. "Serial entrepreneurs’ strategies for innovative business: A typology and assessment," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 12(5), pages 84-95, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • R11 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes
    • J20 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - General
    • L11 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Production, Pricing, and Market Structure; Size Distribution of Firms

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnp:ecopol:ep2308. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RANEPA maintainer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aneeeru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.