IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rnp/ecopol/ep2308.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sanctions, Exit of Foreign Companies and Business Activity in the Russian Regions
[Санкции, Уход Иностранных Компаний И Деловая Активность В Регионах России]

Author

Listed:
  • Zemtsov, Stepan (Земцов, Степан)

    (Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration)

  • Barinova, Vera (Баринова, Вера)

    (Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration)

  • Mikhailov, Alexander (Михайлов, Александр)

    (Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration)

Abstract

Despite the limited markets now available to entrepreneurs and the disruption of supply chains, many indicators of business activity in Russia did not decrease in 2022. However, there are significant differences between regions in their response to these external shocks. The article evaluates factors that brought about changes in the most pertinent indicator of business activity – the growth in the number of new small and medium-sized businesses. First, in regions where economic ties with the countries that imposed sanctions were weaker, there were more such new businesses. In some regions that produce raw materials, those countries annually accounted for more than 80% of exports and imports. Second, the withdrawal of companies from Russia may open up certain market niches (in trade, IT, other services, and processing). The revenue of enterprises from countries deemed unfriendly by the Russian government was about 16 trillion rubles, or about one tenth of the market. The hypothesis that this amount of revenue had a positive effect on the number of newly created small and medium-sized enterprises because of less competition in certain market niches was confirmed provisionally and with a low degree of significance. Third, just as the online sector provided one way of adapting to a crisis during the pandemic, the ubiquitous reach of online trading platforms along with access to parallel imports came into play. In regions where businesses and the public placed more orders for goods and services via the internet, more new enterprises were created. The hypothesis that proximity to unfriendly countries had a negative impact on business activity in the regions at their borders was confirmed. And vice versa, the proximity to Georgia and Azerbaijan had a positive effect as the flow of goods and tourists was redirected toward the North Caucasus. The scale and diversity of markets due to large economic agglomerations in the regions was also beneficial. These observations bear on a number of recommendations.

Suggested Citation

  • Zemtsov, Stepan (Земцов, Степан) & Barinova, Vera (Баринова, Вера) & Mikhailov, Alexander (Михайлов, Александр), 2023. "Sanctions, Exit of Foreign Companies and Business Activity in the Russian Regions [Санкции, Уход Иностранных Компаний И Деловая Активность В Регионах России]," Ekonomicheskaya Politika / Economic Policy, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 2, pages 44-79, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:rnp:ecopol:ep2308
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repec.ranepa.ru/rnp/ecopol/ep2308.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    external shocks; small and medium businesses; market niches; crisis; economic adaptation; border regions; sanctions; parallel imports.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R11 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes
    • J20 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - General
    • L11 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Production, Pricing, and Market Structure; Size Distribution of Firms

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnp:ecopol:ep2308. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RANEPA maintainer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aneeeru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.