IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rnd/arimbr/v17y2025i3p40-46.html

Festival as Catalyst in Community Development in Malaysia: A Conceptual Review

Author

Listed:
  • Ayu Rohaidah Ghazali
  • Wan Soraya Wan Abdul Ghani
  • Nurakmal Ramli
  • Norhidayah Mohd Rashid
  • Muhamad Hafizi Zamri
  • Nini Hartini Asnawi

Abstract

This paper presents a festival-based approach to community development, analyzing social capital, economic revitalization, and environmental sustainability. It attempts to build a comprehensive framework aimed at promoting social cohesion, stimulating local economies, and sustainable practices, as well as community wellbeing, through strategic festival integration into community planning, drawing from diverse literatures. Despite the literature acknowledging the benefits of festivals, there are several gaps. These gaps indicate a need for more systematic approaches to festival design and evaluation, particularly regarding inclusivity, associated economic impacts, and insufficient eco-friendly practices. In the diverse contexts of Malaysia, this study seeks to build a conceptual framework for empirical investigations that would ascertain the developmental impacts of festivals. In doing so, the paper aims to enhance community development theory by integrating festivals as tools for community advancement, thereby serving a broad spectrum of event industry stakeholders from policymakers to local government officials and event planners. It is underscored that the underlying objectives should combine social, economic, and environmental dimensions to ensure holistic long-term benefits derived from the festivals. The research helps to address the literature gap and provides a basis for further investigation, which aims to reshape Malaysian festivals into more inclusive, transformative, and sustainable assets for communities.

Suggested Citation

  • Ayu Rohaidah Ghazali & Wan Soraya Wan Abdul Ghani & Nurakmal Ramli & Norhidayah Mohd Rashid & Muhamad Hafizi Zamri & Nini Hartini Asnawi, 2025. "Festival as Catalyst in Community Development in Malaysia: A Conceptual Review," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 17(3), pages 40-46.
  • Handle: RePEc:rnd:arimbr:v:17:y:2025:i:3:p:40-46
    DOI: 10.22610/imbr.v17i3(I).4683
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ojs.amhinternational.com/index.php/imbr/article/view/4683/3058
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ojs.amhinternational.com/index.php/imbr/article/view/4683
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22610/imbr.v17i3(I).4683?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Young-joo Ahn, 2020. "Do Informal Social Ties and Local Festival Participation Relate to Subjective Well-Being?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Qi Yan & Huawen James Shen & Yunhong Hu, 2021. "Assessing the Learning Effects of Host Communications on the Green Knowledge and Behavior of Festival Attendees—Evidence from Compulsory Garbage Sorting in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-16, February.
    3. Woo-Hyuk Kim & Kyung-Sook Kim, 2018. "Pro-Environmental Intentions among Food Festival Attendees: An Application of the Value-Belief-Norm Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-13, October.
    4. Xiubai Li & Jinok Susanna Kim & Timothy J. Lee, 2021. "Contribution of Supportive Local Communities to Sustainable Event Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-12, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Adisak Suvittawat & Napaporn Janchai & Sirinthorn Seepho & Jaruwat Nonthachai & Intira Nonthachai, 2025. "Sustainable Food Festival Tourism: Integrating the Bio-Circular-Green (BCG) Model for Cultural and Environmental Resilience in Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-33, February.
    2. Xi Li & Runzhe Yu & Xinwei Su, 2021. "Environmental Beliefs and Pro-Environmental Behavioral Intention of an Environmentally Themed Exhibition Audience: The Mediation Role of Exhibition Attachment," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, June.
    3. Yuthasak Chatkaewnapanon & Timothy J. Lee, 2022. "Planning Sustainable Community-Based Tourism in the Context of Thailand: Community, Development, and the Foresight Tools," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-13, June.
    4. Heather Markham Kim & In-Hye Lee & Kyuhyeon Joo & JungHoon (Jay) Lee & Jinsoo Hwang, 2022. "Psychological Benefits of Purchasing Home Meal Replacement in the Context of Eco-Friendly TV Home Shopping Broadcast: The Moderating Role of Personal Norm," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-17, June.
    5. Luiza Ossowska & Dorota Janiszewska & Gregory Kwiatkowski & Dariusz Kloskowski, 2023. "The Impact of Local Food Festivals on Rural Areas’ Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-17, January.
    6. Mateusz Rozmiarek, 2024. "Applying Environmental Sustainability Practices in Martial Arts Sports Clubs: A Case Study of Poznan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-15, November.
    7. Woo-Hyuk Kim & Chunghee Lee & Sungsoo Kim, 2020. "The Influence of Hallyu on Africans’ Perceptions of Korea: The Moderating Role of Service Quality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-10, April.
    8. Kazushige Ide & Seungwon Jeong & Taishi Tsuji & Ryota Watanabe & Yasuhiro Miyaguni & Hirotaka Nakamura & Miyako Kimura & Katsunori Kondo, 2022. "Suggesting Indicators of Age-Friendly City: Social Participation and Happiness, an Ecological Study from the JAGES," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-12, April.
    9. Mohammad Tipu Sultan & Farzana Sharmin & Alina Badulescu & Elena Stiubea & Ke Xue, 2020. "Travelers’ Responsible Environmental Behavior towards Sustainable Coastal Tourism: An Empirical Investigation on Social Media User-Generated Content," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, December.
    10. Davit Marikyan & Savvas Papagiannidis, 2024. "Exercising the “Right to Repair”: A Customer’s Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 193(1), pages 35-61, August.
    11. Yue Chen & Yiting Shen & Can Wang, 2024. "Spatial Heterogeneity of Planning Influencing Factors on Residents’ SWB in Historic Conservation Area of China: Three Cases from Yangzhou," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-27, December.
    12. Yui Yamaoka & Aya Isumi & Satomi Doi & Takeo Fujiwara, 2021. "Association between Children’s Engagement in Community Cultural Activities and Their Mental Health during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Results from A-CHILD Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-10, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnd:arimbr:v:17:y:2025:i:3:p:40-46. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Muhammad Tayyab (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ojs.amhinternational.com/index.php/imbr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.