Diagnoses and Medical Malpractice: A Comparison of Negligence and Strict Liability Systems
This article examines the incentive structures that the negligence and strict liability systems provide for physicians. Other articles have analyzed the effects of these rules when an increase in care will reduce the probability of an accident. In a large class of decisions, a physician cannot reduce the probability of an accident by increasing care. He can reduce the probability of one type of accident only by increasing the probability of another. It is shown that for this class of decisions, the negligence system is more effective than strict liability in altering the decisionmaker's utility function to reflect social costs.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 13 (1982)
Issue (Month): 1 (Spring)
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.rje.org|
|Order Information:||Web: https://editorialexpress.com/cgi-bin/rje_online.cgi|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rje:bellje:v:13:y:1982:i:spring:p:170-180. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.