IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ris/statec/0057.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Structural and spatial priorities of socio-economic development and their implementation in the territory of the Rostov region (Russian Federation)

Author

Listed:
  • Vasilyeva, Valentina S.

    (Rostov State Economic University)

Abstract

Proper strategic management of regional socio-economic development is impossible without strategic planning that provides a full analysis of the current development of the system and the formation of a desired image of its future development and the mechanisms for its implementation. An element of the goal-setting system in the process of strategic planning is the identification of priorities for socio-economic development that allow for more efficient use of limited budget resources. It has been offered to focus on structural-spatial type priorities, providing for the interconnection of structural and spatial changes in the system and an opportunity to solve restructuring problems by stimulating territorial development and, conversely, developing territories through support for specific sectors of the economy. The methods of logical, comparative and economic analysis, tabular and graphical data visualization have been used. The structural and spatial priorities of the socio-economic development of the Rostov Region have been highlighted and the growth poles and strategic design initiatives of a structural-spatial nature defined in the Strategy for the Socio-Economic Development of the Rostov Region for the period up to 2030 have been systematized from the point of view of implementing the identified priorities. This, in turn, made it possible to consider the opportunity of realizing structural and spatial priorities within the framework of measures enshrined in the strategic planning documents of the Rostov Region using the example of agro-industrial growth poles, to propose an additional set of measures to implement the spatial development tool – to prepare and create agro-industrial parks in agro-industrial growth poles of the Rostov Region using the mechanism of public-private partnership.

Suggested Citation

  • Vasilyeva, Valentina S., 2020. "Structural and spatial priorities of socio-economic development and their implementation in the territory of the Rostov region (Russian Federation)," Economic Consultant, Roman I. Ostapenko, vol. 30(2), pages 25-35.
    • Handle: RePEc:ris:statec:0057
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://statecounsellor.files.wordpress.com/2020/07/200202.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cong Xu & Shixin Wang & Yi Zhou & Litao Wang & Wenliang Liu, 2016. "A Comprehensive Quantitative Evaluation of New Sustainable Urbanization Level in 20 Chinese Urban Agglomerations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-19, January.
    2. Mau, Vladimir, 2012. "From Perestroika to Radical Reforms: the Twentieth Anniversary of the Beginning of the Post-Communist Transformations," Ekonomicheskaya Politika / Economic Policy, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, pages 5-20, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Konovalenkov, Stanislav V., 2020. "Digital transformation of obtaining data for an express assessment of regional sustainable development," Economic Consultant, Roman I. Ostapenko, vol. 30(2), pages 13-24.
    2. Weiwei Li & Pingtao Yi & Danning Zhang, 2018. "Sustainability Evaluation of Cities in Northeastern China Using Dynamic TOPSIS-Entropy Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-15, December.
    3. Hailiang Ma & Nan-Ting Chou & Lei Wang, 2016. "Dynamic Coupling Analysis of Urbanization and Water Resource Utilization Systems in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-18, November.
    4. Nelunika Priyashani & Nayomi Kankanamge & Tan Yigitcanlar, 2023. "Multisource Open Geospatial Big Data Fusion: Application of the Method to Demarcate Urban Agglomeration Footprints," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-23, February.
    5. Pingtao Yi & Lu Wang & Danning Zhang & Weiwei Li, 2019. "Sustainability Assessment of Provincial-Level Regions in China Using Composite Sustainable Indicator," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-20, September.
    6. Pekka Halla & Albert Merino‐Saum, 2022. "Conceptual frameworks in indicator‐based assessments of urban sustainability—An analysis based on 67 initiatives," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(5), pages 1056-1071, October.
    7. Qiufang Shi & Xiaoyong Yan & Bin Jia & Ziyou Gao, 2020. "Freight Data-Driven Research on Evaluation Indexes for Urban Agglomeration Development Degree," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-16, June.
    8. Lin Ding & Zhenfeng Shao & Hanchao Zhang & Cong Xu & Dewen Wu, 2016. "A Comprehensive Evaluation of Urban Sustainable Development in China Based on the TOPSIS-Entropy Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-23, August.
    9. Dong Xu & Guolin Hou, 2019. "The Spatiotemporal Coupling Characteristics of Regional Urbanization and Its Influencing Factors: Taking the Yangtze River Delta as an Example," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-19, February.
    10. Juan Yin & Zhong Yang & Jin Guo, 2022. "Externalities of Urban Agglomerations: An Empirical Study of the Chinese Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-19, September.
    11. Yuantong Jiang & Shoukai Sun & Yening Wang & Shuanning Zheng, 2018. "Niche Evolution of China’s Provincial Social–Economic–Natural Complex Ecosystems, 2005–2015," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-19, August.
    12. Jing Peng & Yanhong Liu & Qi Wang & Guoping Tu & Xinjian Huang, 2021. "The Impact of New Urbanization Policy on In Situ Urbanization—Policy Test Based on Difference-in-Differences Model," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-16, February.
    13. Fernanda Caroline Caldatto & Sandro César Bortoluzzi & Edson Pinheiro de Lima & Sergio E. Gouvea da Costa, 2021. "Urban Sustainability Performance Measurement of a Small Brazilian City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-16, September.
    14. Danning Du, 2017. "The causal relationship between land urbanization quality and economic growth: evidence from capital cities in China," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(6), pages 2707-2723, November.
    15. Jing Bian & Hong Ren & Ping Liu & Yu Zhang, 2018. "Sustainable Urbanization Performance Evaluation Based on “Origin” and “Modernization” Perspectives: A Case Study of Chongqing, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-17, August.
    16. Halla, Pekka & Merino-Saum, Albert, 2021. "Conceptual frameworks for urban sustainability indicators - an empirical analysis," SocArXiv vayq7, Center for Open Science.
    17. Chao Wei & Zhanqi Wang & Xi Lan & Hongwei Zhang & Mengjiao Fan, 2018. "The Spatial-Temporal Characteristics and Dilemmas of Sustainable Urbanization in China: A New Perspective Based on the Concept of Five-in-One," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-28, December.
    18. Pingtao Yi & Weiwei Li & Danning Zhang, 2019. "Assessment of City Sustainability Using MCDM with Interdependent Criteria Weight," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-20, March.
    19. Jingtao Wang & Haibin Liu & Di Peng & Qian Lv & Yu Sun & Hui Huang & Hao Liu, 2021. "The County-Scale Economic Spatial Pattern and Influencing Factors of Seven Urban Agglomerations in the Yellow River Basin—A Study Based on the Integrated Nighttime Light Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-22, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    agro-industrial parks; public-private partnership; poles of growth; priorities of socio-economic development; Rostov Region; strategic project initiatives; structural and spatial priorities;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R50 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:statec:0057. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Roman I. Ostapenko (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.