IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ris/buecrj/0502.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of TFRS, BOBI FRS, KUMI FRS and General Communiqué on Application of Accounting System (MSUGT) in terms of Tangible Fixed Assets and Depreciation

Author

Listed:
  • Aytac, Alp

    (Bursa Uludag University)

  • Gucenme Gencoglu, Umit

    (Bursa Uludag University)

Abstract

Tangible fixed assets have an essential place in the balance sheet, and accurate calculation of costs, valuation, depreciation, and accurate presentation of related financial statements are crucial. There are regulations in Turkish Financial Reporting Standards (TFRS), Financial Reporting Standard for Large and Medium-sized Entities (BOBI FRS), Financial Reporting Standard for Small and Micro Entities (KUMI FRS) and General Communiqué on Application of Accounting System (MSUGT) tax applications related to tangible fixed assets. The purpose of this study, which is carried out by scanning standards and legislative provisions, is to identify similar and different aspects by comparing these regulations that form different reporting frameworks. In addition, emphasizing the differences and similarities between standards and tax regulations used in MSUGT applications and contributing to the literature and applications are among the aims of the study. As a result, even though there are many similarities within the framework of TFRS, BOBI FRS, and KUMI FRS draft, borrowing costs and delay interest separation issues are different among standards. However, there are essential differences between tax regulation and standards that aim informational reporting, especially in terms of depreciation and measurement in the following periods.

Suggested Citation

  • Aytac, Alp & Gucenme Gencoglu, Umit, 2020. "Comparison of TFRS, BOBI FRS, KUMI FRS and General Communiqué on Application of Accounting System (MSUGT) in terms of Tangible Fixed Assets and Depreciation," Business and Economics Research Journal, Uludag University, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, vol. 11(3), pages 753-767, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:ris:buecrj:0502
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.berjournal.com/comparison-of-tfrs-bobi-frs-kumi-frs-and-general-communique-on-application-of-accounting-system-msugt-in-terms-of-tangible-fixed-assets-and-depreciation
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Financial Reporting Frameworks; Tangible Fixed Assets; KUMI FRS;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K34 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - Tax Law
    • M40 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - General
    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting
    • M48 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Government Policy and Regulation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:buecrj:0502. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Adem Anbar (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iiulutr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.