IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ris/apecjn/0014.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Determinants of Farmers’ Cropping Systems Adoption: A Case of the Upland Farmers in Northern Thailand

Author

Listed:
  • Phetcharat , Chaowana

    (Faculty of Economics, Chiangmai University, Thailand.)

  • Chalermphol, Juthathip

    (Faculty of Agriculture, Chiangmai University, Thailand.)

  • Siphumin, Phuphing

    (Faculty of Sciences and Agricultural Technology, Rajamangala University of Technology Lanna, Thailand.)

  • Khempet, Saibua

    (Faculty of Agricultural Technology, Chiang Mai Rajabhat University, Thailand.)

Abstract

Lack of farming knowledge still appears in the remote areas of northern Thailand particularly among upland farmers who often use conventional farming and mono-cropping techniques. The cropping system involves a specialization skill in production from farmers and it does require a large quantity of land to meet and individual farmer’s need. Over the past decade, the forest cover in northern Thailand had dramatically decreased due to demands of land cultivation. As a multi-cropping system may provide advantages to the farmers, intercropping and sequential cropping system can help to minimize crop production and price risks. The system does not only give sufficient economic returns but it also provides a long-term ecological sustainability. This practice is a way to transform upland farmers into becoming more self-reliant. This research aimed to analyze and determine the key factors of farmers’ decision to adopt the multi-cropping practice. Logit model was applied in the study, and was based on a survey of 202 respondents from the highland communities of northern Thailand. The results showed that the famers’ education attainment, attitude toward environmental awareness, and household financial situation are important to their choice of practicing the multi-cropping system. Education and lower debt amount led to an increase in the probability of upland farmers to try the multicropping system. The households with larger farms are willing to use part of their available land to do the multi-cropping. An increase in the farmers’ level of environmental concern was also observed to increase the probability of the multi-cropping system being adopted.

Suggested Citation

  • Phetcharat , Chaowana & Chalermphol, Juthathip & Siphumin, Phuphing & Khempet, Saibua, 2017. "The Determinants of Farmers’ Cropping Systems Adoption: A Case of the Upland Farmers in Northern Thailand," Asian Journal of Applied Economics/ Applied Economics Journal, Kasetsart University, Faculty of Economics, Center for Applied Economic Research, vol. 24(2), pages 52-62, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ris:apecjn:0014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://so01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/AEJ/article/view/115018/88966
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: Asian Journal of Applied Economics/ Applied Economics Journal
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wirat Krasachat, 2023. "The Effect of Good Agricultural Practices on the Technical Efficiency of Chili Production in Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-25, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    cropping system; farmers’ decision; logit model; multi-cropping; upland farmers;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q01 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General - - - Sustainable Development
    • Q10 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - General
    • Q12 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Micro Analysis of Farm Firms, Farm Households, and Farm Input Markets
    • Q18 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Policy; Food Policy; Animal Welfare Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:apecjn:0014. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Arannee Tongjankaew (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feckuth.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.