IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ris/ambsrv/021864.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficiency of Liberal Arts Colleges: A DEA Analysis of Non-Elite LACs

Author

Listed:
  • Joshua C. Hall

    (West Virginia University, West Virginia, U.S.A.)

  • Joylynn Pruitt

    (West Virginia University, West Virginia, U.S.A.)

  • Daniel Bonneau

    (West Virginia University, West Virginia, U.S.A.)

Abstract

The demographic cliff, the effects of COVID-19, and shifts in regional preferences for higher education pose an important threat to Liberal Arts Colleges (LACs). While other studies have examined the efficiency of top-ranked LACs, this paper examines the colleges most challenged by the current environment. Using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and 6-year graduation rate as the outcome of interest, our results show that the average LAC outside the top 100 ranked schools (according to U.S. News & World Report) operates at about 74 percent efficiency. Many schools within the sample score closer to 50 percent. These rankings are then evaluated as a function of school factors such as location, religious affiliation, varsity sports activity, and enrollment. Results show that suburban LACs with more majors offered, and lower enrollment are more efficient.

Suggested Citation

  • Joshua C. Hall & Joylynn Pruitt & Daniel Bonneau, 2025. "Efficiency of Liberal Arts Colleges: A DEA Analysis of Non-Elite LACs," American Business Review, Pompea College of Business, University of New Haven, vol. 28(2), pages 635-651, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:ris:ambsrv:021864
    DOI: 10.37625/abr.28.2.635-651
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://digitalcommons.newhaven.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3639&context=americanbusinessreview
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.37625/abr.28.2.635-651?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • I20 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - General
    • I23 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Higher Education; Research Institutions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:ambsrv:021864. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Amber Montano (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cbnhaus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.