IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rfa/smcjnl/v13y2025i4p392-405.html

Furry Ambassadors: A Critical Metaphor Analysis of Panda Diplomacy in Chinese Mainstream Media

Author

Listed:
  • Jie Zhang
  • Mohd Azidan Bin Abdul Jabar
  • Farhana Muslim Binti Mohd Jalis

Abstract

This study adopts the theoretical framework of Critical Metaphor Analysis (Charteris-Black, 2004) to systematically examine the symbolic metaphors and their discursive functions constructed in Chinese mainstream English-language media’s coverage of “panda diplomacy†. Through corpus coding by NVivo14.0, the study identifies five categories of positive metaphors (national and ideological symbols, personified roles, functional symbols, cultural totems and connective structures) and three categories of negative metaphors (concealment, manipulative tools and threat narratives). The results show that Chinese media construct a national identity characterized by “peaceful development†, “win-win cooperation†and “non-threat†through positive metaphors such as “messenger of peace†, “cultural calling card†and “bridge of friendship†. Meanwhile, by quoting and rebutting negative metaphors such as “political tool†and “ideological weapon†, the media form a “quotation-rebuttal†discursive structure that indirectly reinforces the legitimacy and justifiability of China’s diplomacy. This study further points out that positive and negative metaphors are not equally weighted but together constitute a dual-track discursive pathway for national identity construction- on the one hand, actively constructing a national identity characterized by cultural affinity and global responsibility; on the other hand, responding to external doubts through strategic rebuttals, reflecting the media’s discursive capacity and agenda-setting awareness in the international public sphere. This research provides both theoretical and empirical reference for studies on national identity, critical metaphor analysis and diplomatic discourse.

Suggested Citation

  • Jie Zhang & Mohd Azidan Bin Abdul Jabar & Farhana Muslim Binti Mohd Jalis, 2025. "Furry Ambassadors: A Critical Metaphor Analysis of Panda Diplomacy in Chinese Mainstream Media," Studies in Media and Communication, Redfame publishing, vol. 13(4), pages 392-405, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:rfa:smcjnl:v:13:y:2025:i:4:p:392-405
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://redfame.com/journal/index.php/smc/article/download/7983/7062
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://redfame.com/journal/index.php/smc/article/view/7983
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Isaiah Agbo & Goodluck Kadiri & Blessing Ijem, 2018. "Critical Metaphor Analysis of Political Discourse in Nigeria," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(5), pages 1-95, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Isaiah I. Agbo & Festus U. Ngwoke & Blessing U. Ijem, 2019. "Transitivity Processes in President Buhari’s ‘My Covenant With Nigerians’," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(4), pages 1-7, April.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfa:smcjnl:v:13:y:2025:i:4:p:392-405. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Redfame publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.