IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Construct Validity of Likert Scales through Confirmatory Factor Analysis: A Simulation Study Comparing Different Methods of Estimation Based on Pearson and Polychoric Correlations

Listed author(s):
  • Mar¨ªa de los ¨¢ngeles Morata-Ram¨ªrez
  • Francisco Pablo Holgado-Tello


    (Universidad Nacional de Educaci¨®n a Distancia (UNED))

Registered author(s):

    The widespread use of Pearson correlations and, by extension, the Maximum Likelihood estimation method, does not take into account the measurement properties of Likert scales observed variables when carrying out a construct validity process through Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). This simulation study compares four estimation methods (Maximum Likelihood ¨CML-, Robust Maximum Likelihood ¨CRML-, Robust Unweighted Least Squares ¨C, RULS) according to two of the assumptions CFA is supposed to fulfil: multivariate normality and, especially, the continuous measurement nature of both latent and observed variables. Goodness of fit is diagnosed by ¦Ö2 Likelihood Ratio Test and RMSEA indices. Results suggest ULS and RULS are preferable as polychoric correlations help to overcome grouping and transformation errors produced when using Pearson correlations for ordinal observed variables. Data measurement scale consideration enhances the ability of hypothesized models to reproduce accurately construct variables relationships.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by Redfame publishing in its journal International Journal of Social Science Studies.

    Volume (Year): 1 (2013)
    Issue (Month): 1 (April)
    Pages: 54-61

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:rfa:journl:v:1:y:2013:i:1:p:54-61
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    CDM - CEMI, Odyssea, Station 5, CH - 1015 Lausanne

    Phone: +41 21 693 0036
    Fax: +41 21 693 0020
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfa:journl:v:1:y:2013:i:1:p:54-61. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Redfame publishing)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.