IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rfa/jetsjl/v8y2020i2p38-46.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Preservice Science Teachers’ Misconceptions About Evolution

Author

Listed:
  • Ayla KarataÅŸ

Abstract

Misconceptions/misunderstandings are a basic problem often encountered in topics in education. “Misunderstandings†commonly observed about evolution makes it difficult for biology teachers to teach this topic. Reasons that are related to teachers are a basic source of misconceptions. Misconceptions can increase incrementally if their source is teachers. This study aims to determine the nature and scope of nonscientific views about evolution in preservice science teachers. An important step in correcting misconceptions or misunderstandings is to first determine the frequently observed misunderstandings. This study investigates and compares the misconceptions of students who have completed an evolution course and those who have not. The results showed that an evolution course considerably decreased the misconceptions. The most frequently observed misconceptions were; considering evolution as the effort to bring living things to perfection, associating evolution only with Darwin, identifying evolution with metamorphosis, thinking that living things evolve to accommodate, and having only a human-focused perspective about evolution. The idea that believing in evolution is an alternative to believing in a creator; that it is not possible for someone to believe in a creator and, at the same time in evolution, or vice versa also appeared as a noteworthy misconception revealed by the study.

Suggested Citation

  • Ayla KarataÅŸ, 2020. "Preservice Science Teachers’ Misconceptions About Evolution," Journal of Education and Training Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 8(2), pages 38-46, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:rfa:jetsjl:v:8:y:2020:i:2:p:38-46
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://redfame.com/journal/index.php/jets/article/download/4690/4876
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://redfame.com/journal/index.php/jets/article/view/4690
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfa:jetsjl:v:8:y:2020:i:2:p:38-46. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Redfame publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.