Author
Listed:
- Dmytro Кyslenko
- Viktoriia Bielova
- Maksym Karpovets
- Inna Nahrybelna
- Kostiantyn Dieiev
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to determine the advantages of artificial intelligence as personalized learning tools for students. The study utilized analytical and observational methods, the RAISE methodology, as well as analysis of variance and Student's t-test to determine the difference in perspectives between students and educators. Learning English was based on a combination of tools aimed at cultivating writing proficiency (Claude AI). Further, the enhancement of English competencies was achieved using the Write & Improve application. Conversational skills were developed using the Speak AI and Duolingo Max applications. It was determined that the value of these tools lies in the capacity for personalized learning (Y_ijk=4.357). Notably, the perspectives of students (Claude AI- 30%) and educators (Speak AI- 31%) divided in terms of the learning technologies' effectiveness, which is associated with improving the practical lessons. In the experimental group, the introduction of technology tion of English language learning considerably influenced the cultivation of the students' ability to analytical thinking (98%), which contributed to enhancing their writing and speaking skills. The lack of machine intelligence competencies enabled the students to improve short-term memory (83%), yet exerted a less profound impact on cultivating their communicative competencies. For the universities, the implementation of such technologies has practical significance, in particular for ensuring continuity in mastering the English language.
Suggested Citation
Dmytro Кyslenko & Viktoriia Bielova & Maksym Karpovets & Inna Nahrybelna & Kostiantyn Dieiev, 2026.
"The Efficacy of Dialogic AI-Based Products as Personal Tutors in Enhancing Student Learning Outcomes,"
Journal of Education and Training Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 14(3), pages 31-40, July.
Handle:
RePEc:rfa:jetsjl:v:14:y:2026:i:3:p:31-40
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
JEL classification:
- R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
- Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfa:jetsjl:v:14:y:2026:i:3:p:31-40. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Redfame publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.