IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rfa/jetsjl/v14y2026i3p227-237.html

Assessing Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS): Fine Arts Educators' Views on the System's Effectiveness

Author

Listed:
  • Brianna M. Miller
  • Michael Shriner

Abstract

Fine arts educator perspectives on the Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS) were examined through this action research study. As part of a larger action research project, the study presents findings from eight semi-structured interview questions focused on the system's effectiveness, particularly its validity and alignment with expected performance goals when used to assess fine arts educators. Results suggest that although T-TESS provides a widely accepted rubric that promotes accountability and allows educators to ensure they are employing best teaching practices, the tool's inability to capture the unique aspects of fine arts instruction makes it difficult for T-TESS to be used to provide fine arts educators with meaningful and applicable feedback. Participants noted that, while T-TESS may not have been originally designed with fine arts educators in mind, skilled evaluators can still use it to promote professional growth and accountability within this field. The authors conclude that offering evaluators opportunities to deepen their understanding of the fine arts, as well as enhancing communication between fine arts educators and their evaluators, would enable evaluators to deliver more relevant, meaningful feedback to fine arts teachers.

Suggested Citation

  • Brianna M. Miller & Michael Shriner, 2026. "Assessing Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS): Fine Arts Educators' Views on the System's Effectiveness," Journal of Education and Training Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 14(3), pages 227-237, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:rfa:jetsjl:v:14:y:2026:i:3:p:227-237
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://redfame.com/journal/index.php/jets/article/download/8640/7337
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://redfame.com/journal/index.php/jets/article/view/8640
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfa:jetsjl:v:14:y:2026:i:3:p:227-237. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Redfame publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.