IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rfa/jetsjl/v11y2023i3p57-67.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Coaching Elementary Teachers in Literacy: Does Feedback Type Matter for Low Implementers?

Author

Listed:
  • Elizabeth A. Cutrer-Párraga
  • Erica Ellsworth Miller
  • Erjola Gjini
  • Melia Fonoimoana Garrett

Abstract

For literacy coaches and teachers, feedback is an integral component of effective coaching. Yet, little is understood about the interaction between feedback and high/low implementing teachers within coaching sessions. This multiple case study explored the types of feedback literacy coaches provided both high and low implementing teachers over a two-year period. In the first year, the literacy coaches provided at least twice as much instructional feedback as emotional feedback to low-implementing teachers. Those teachers not only received more feedback in general, but the feedback they received was primarily what they needed to do to improve. In contrast, during the same period literacy coaches provided high-implementing teachers more emotional feedback than instructional feedback. Low implementation, or resistance, observed in this study may have been tied to the overwhelming amount and type of feedback the low implementing teachers received. Coaches seeking to enhance instructional practices could benefit from attending to the amount and type of feedback they provide their learners.Â

Suggested Citation

  • Elizabeth A. Cutrer-Párraga & Erica Ellsworth Miller & Erjola Gjini & Melia Fonoimoana Garrett, 2023. "Coaching Elementary Teachers in Literacy: Does Feedback Type Matter for Low Implementers?," Journal of Education and Training Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 11(3), pages 57-67, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:rfa:jetsjl:v:11:y:2023:i:3:p:57-67
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://redfame.com/journal/index.php/jets/article/download/5975/6179
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://redfame.com/journal/index.php/jets/article/view/5975
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfa:jetsjl:v:11:y:2023:i:3:p:57-67. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Redfame publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.